•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 

A00120 Summary:

BILL NOA00120
 
SAME ASSAME AS S04243
 
SPONSORDinowitz
 
COSPNSRColton, Brindisi, Miller, Skoufis
 
MLTSPNSRBrennan, Gottfried
 
Amd S396-r, Gen Bus L
 
Creates a private right of action for unlawful price gouging for injunctive relief and recovery of actual damages or $1000 whichever is greater, or both, in addition to right of action granted to attorney general; permits the court to award a prevailing plaintiff an additional penalty of up to $5,000 for a willful or knowing violation and reasonable attorney's fees.
Go to top

A00120 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A120
 
SPONSOR: Dinowitz (MS)
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the general business law, in relation to price gouging   PURPOSE: The purpose of this bill is to grant citizens who are victims of illegal price gouging in times of emergency the right to directly sue the responsible party.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: The bill inserts a new subdivision into the existing price gouging statute (General Business Law Section 396-r) granting a private right of action to citizens who fall victim to price gouging in times of emergency. The bill would provide for the possibil- ity of injunctive relief, a minimum $1,000 damage claim and a discre- tionary additional award up to $5,000 for willful violations.   JUSTIFICATION: Presently, only the State Attorney General is empowered to bring legal action against violators of the price gouging statute. This bill would leave the Attorney General's powers in this regard intact, but would also permit individual victims of price gouging to sue the price gougers directly. The events that occurred during the Great Ice Storm of 1998, which affected five northern counties in New York, demonstrate the need for this legislation. These counties were in a state of emergency, which placed the price gouging statute in effect in those areas. Nonetheless, reports from these northern counties indicated that, prices on every- thing from electrical generators to hotel space to milk and batteries increased dramatically in an attempt to take advantage of those suffer- ing from the disaster. Indeed, hundreds of complaints of price gouging were filed. By some accounts, prices were set at six times above normal. For example, a $40 piece of cable was being sold for $240, C batteries were being offered at $11 a piece and one store was charging $995 for generators that are regularly priced at $690. This example, along with documented instances of price gouging that have occurred since 1993, including gouging by certain hotels after the events of September 11, 2001, gouging by snowplow operators after a major snowstorm in Buffalo in December 2001, and gouging that occurred after Hurricane Katrina in 2005, demonstrate that the threat of enforce- ment by the Attorney General is not serving as an adequate deterrent. Other states have recognized that a private right of action is necessary to effectively deter would-be price gougers. At least seven other states allow private plaintiffs to bring actions against those who engage in such activity. Clearly, the current enforcement provisions of the price gouging statute are insufficient. Private citizens must be empowered to seek relief on their own from those who seek to profit unjustly from others' misfor- tunes.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2013-2014: A.311- Ordered to Third Reading Calendar No. 20 2011-2012: A.311- Passed Assembly 2009-2010: A.278-A - Passed Assembly 2007-2008: A.223 - Passed Assembly 2005-2006: A.662 - Passed Assembly   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.   EFFECTIVE DATE:; Immediately.
Go to top

A00120 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                           120
 
                               2015-2016 Regular Sessions
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                       (Prefiled)
 
                                     January 7, 2015
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced by M. of A. DINOWITZ, COLTON, BRINDISI, MILLER -- Multi-Spon-
          sored  by -- M. of A.  BRENNAN, GOTTFRIED -- read once and referred to
          the Committee on Consumer Affairs and Protection
 
        AN ACT to amend the general business law, in relation to price gouging
 
          The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and  Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section  1.  Section  396-r  of the general business law is amended by
     2  adding a new subdivision 5 to read as follows:
     3    5. In addition to any right of action granted to the attorney  general
     4  pursuant  to  this section, any person who has been injured by reason of
     5  any violation of this section may bring an action in his or her own name
     6  to enjoin such unlawful act or practice, an action to recover his or her
     7  actual damages or one thousand dollars, whichever is  greater,  or  both
     8  such  actions.  The  court  may, in its discretion, award the prevailing
     9  plaintiff in such action an additional award not to exceed five thousand
    10  dollars, if  the  court  finds  the  defendant  willfully  violated  the
    11  provisions  of  this  section. The court may award reasonable attorneys'
    12  fees to a prevailing plaintiff.
    13    § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
 
 
 
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD00700-01-5
Go to top