•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 

A04401 Summary:

BILL NOA04401
 
SAME ASSAME AS S02659
 
SPONSORAubry
 
COSPNSRPerry, Arroyo, Barrett, Steck, Rivera, Gottfried, Wright, Cook, Jaffee, Davila, Lupardo, Sepulveda, Mosley, Ortiz, Peoples-Stokes, Skartados, Quart, Weprin, Rosenthal, Lifton, Abinanti, Pretlow, Bichotte, Linares, Barron, Walker, Blake, Rodriguez, Fahy, Titone, McDonald, Cahill, Harris, Joyner, Russell, Benedetto, Solages, Richardson, Pichardo, Hyndman, Stirpe, Kavanagh, Titus, Kim, Simotas, Otis, Mayer
 
MLTSPNSRBrennan, Cusick, Englebright, Farrell, Glick, Hevesi, Lavine, Lentol, Magee, Robinson, Schimel, Seawright, Simon, Thiele
 
Amd SS137, 2, 401-a & 45, Cor L
 
Restricts the use of segregated confinement and creates alternative therapeutic and rehabilitative confinement options; limits the length of time a person may be in segregated confinement and excludes certain persons from being placed in segregated confinement.
Go to top

A04401 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A4401
 
SPONSOR: Aubry (MS)
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the correction law, in relation to restricting the use of segregated confinement and creating alternative therapeutic and rehabilitative confinement options   PURPOSE: This bill will be known as the "Humane Alternatives to Long-Term Soli- tary Confinement" Act (the HALT Solitary Confinement Act.) This bill would limit the time an inmate can spend in segregated confinement, end the segregated confinement of vulnerable people, restrict the criteria that can result in such confinement, improve conditions of confinement, and create more humane and effective alterna- tives to such confinement.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 states the purpose of the bill. Section 2 clarifies that the bill's provisions apply to all types and locations of segregated confinement. Section 3 defines "special populations"; "emergency", "short-term" and "extended segregated confinement"; and "residential rehabilitation units". Section 4g prohibits segregation of vulnerable groups ("special popu- lations"), including young and elderly people, people with physical or mental disabilities, pregnant women, new mothers, and members of the LGBTI community. Section 4h places a limit of 15 consecutive days and a limit of 20 total days in a 60 day period on the amount of time any person can spend in segregated confinement, and requires that beyond those limits all persons must be released or sent to a separate secure residential reha- bilitation unit (RRU). Section 4ii enhances conditions in segregated confinement, including additional out-of-cell time, congregate recreation, access to essential services, and bans on orders depriving basic necessities, including restricted diets. It also provides for new RRUs as a more humane and effective alternative that provide meaningful - human contact and thera- peutic, trauma-informed, and rehabilitative programs aimed at addressing underlying causes of behavior. Section 4j restricts the criteria for segregated confinement beyond three days or RRUs to more serious acts of physical injury, forced sexu- al acts, extortion, coercion, inciting serious disturbance, procuring deadly weapons or dangerous contraband, or escape. It allows for segre- gated confinement of three days for department rule violations, and 24-hour emergency confinement if necessary. It prohibits segregated confinement for purposes of protective custody and requires that any protective custody unit at a minimum meet the standards for RRUs. Section 4k enhances procedural protections for placement in segregated confinement including allowing for representation, and assessments for determining whether someone is a member of a "special population" prior to segregation. Section 41 creates mechanisms for periodic review and release from an RRU based on a resident's progress and acts, expiration of a discipli- nary sentence, expiration of a one-year limit, or independent outside review after one year in an RRU. Section 4m requires training for RRU staff and hearing officers and Section 4n requires public reporting on the use of segregation and RRUs. Sections 5 and 6 require oversight over implementation of the bill.   JUSTIFICATION: This bill aims to make New York's prison and jail practices more humane and effective. The bill limits the length of time anyone can spend in segregated confinement, restricts the criteria that can result in such confinement, provides additional procedural protections prior to such confinement, and exempts certain vulnerable groups. The bill also provides an alternative mechanism for working with people who engage in serious violence or other problematic behavior that involves - not deprivation - but therapeutic and rehabilitative support and programs. Segregated confinement is inhumane and ineffective. Studies have long and consistently found that subjecting people to segregated confinement for twenty-two to twenty-four hours a day without meaningful human contact, programming, or therapy often causes deep and permanent psycho- logical, physical, developmental, and social harm. This harm not only violates common values of decency, but also is counterproductive because people often have more difficulty complying with prison rules after being placed in segregated confinement. Segregated confinement can be particularly devastating for certain vulnerable people, such as young or elderly people, pregnant women, and people with disabilities or addiction or trauma histories; and segregated members of the LGBTI community are more vulnerable to abuse. Other states have dramatically reduced the number of people in segregated confinement, and seen posi- tive benefits in terms of safety and decreased violence. Despite the tremendous harm caused by massive isolation of thousands of incarcerated persons, New York prisons and jails currently impose segre- gated confinement too broadly, routinely, and for too long a period of time. On any given day, there are nearly 4,000 people, disproportionate- ly people of color, in state prisons in Special Housing Units (SHU) and thousands more in other forms of isolation. There are also around a thousand more people in segregated confinement in jails in New York City alone. Despite claims that segregated confinement is used in response to the most violent behavior, five out of six disciplinary infractions that result in SHU time in New York prisons are for non-violent conduct. Moreover, people routinely suffer in segregated confinement for months, years, and even decades in New York. A growing chorus of individuals, organizations, and policy-makers has called for a dramatic transformation and curtailment of the use of segregated confinement, The United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture concluded that solitary confinement can amount to torture and recom- mended abolishing its use beyond 15 days and prohibiting any use of solitary for vulnerable groups or purposes of punishment. The New York Civil Liberties Union and others have issued reports documenting the arbitrary and unjustified use of segregated confinement in New York and the negative impacts its use has on incarcerated persons, staff, and safety in our prisons and communities. The New York State Bar Associ- ation has called upon the state and city corrections departments to profoundly restrict the use of segregated confinement, end segregated confinement beyond 15 days, adopt stringent criteria for any separation, and ensure any separation is for the briefest period and in the least restrictive conditions practicable. This bill takes up the growing call to limit segregated confinement and provide more humane and effective alternatives.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: A.8588-A was amended and recommitted to correction in 2014.   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: To be determined.   LOCAL FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: To be determined.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act will take effect immediately.
Go to top