•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A09783 Summary:

BILL NOA09783
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORGlick
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd 286, Mult Dwell L
 
Relates to finding of coverage of a unit or occupant and the status of an interim multiple dwelling unit as a protected occupant's primary residence by the loft board or a court of competent jurisdiction, or by registration of with the loft board; provides factors for consideration for such findings; restores certain landlord-tenant relationships severed prior to the effective date.
Go to top    

A09783 Actions:

BILL NOA09783
 
04/09/2024referred to housing
Go to top

A09783 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A9783
 
SPONSOR: Glick
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the multiple dwelling law, in relation to coverage of a unit or occupant and the status of an interim multiple dwelling unit as a protected occupant's primary residence   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: To clarify tenant protections under the Loft Law.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 sets forth legislative findings. Section 2 amends paragraph 1 of subdivision 2 of section 286 of the multiple dwelling law to clarify that the primary residency requirement for continued occupancy protections in a loft unit is to be assessed subsequent to the finding of coverage by the loft board or a court of competent jurisdiction or registration with the loft board of the occu- pant's unit. A new subdivision 14 is added to state that determinations for coverage under the Loft Law shall not rest upon any single factor. Section 3 sets forth the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: The Loft Law is intended to provide a pathway for residential units that were illegally converted from commercial and manufacturing space to be brought into conformity with safety standards and receive a certificate of occupancy. When making determinations on potential coverage of inter- im multiple dwellings and their protected occupants, the Loft Board has considered the primary residency requirement for continued occupancy protection to begin with the filing of an application for protected status, and rightfully so because prior to this point tenants are living illegally without rent and eviction protections. Furthermore, the Loft Board considers all relevant evidence when determining whether a unit is the tenant's primary residence. This bill codifies the Loft Board's rules and precedent in this regard.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: New bill.   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately, and shall apply to all pending actions or proceedings, including appeals.
Go to top

A09783 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          9783
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                      April 9, 2024
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by M. of A. GLICK -- read once and referred to the Committee
          on Housing
 
        AN ACT to amend the multiple dwelling law, in relation to coverage of  a
          unit  or  occupant and the status of an interim multiple dwelling unit
          as a protected occupant's primary residence
 
          The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and  Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:

     1    Section  1.  Legislative  findings.  The  legislature hereby finds and
     2  declares that the findings in section 280 of the multiple  dwelling  law
     3  are  reaffirmed;  that  the  decision from the Appellate Division, First
     4  Department, in One Double Nine Dashing LLC v New York City Loft Board et
     5  al. (2022) misinterpreted  the  relationship  of  primary  residence  to
     6  continued  occupancy  of potential protected occupants under article 7-C
     7  of the multiple dwelling law; that the unique  illegal  living  arrange-
     8  ments of potential protected occupants prior to loft law coverage, with-
     9  out rent and eviction protections and without the applicability of mini-
    10  mum  housing  maintenance  standards, necessitates a regulatory approach
    11  which is not always the same as for other rent-regulated  tenants;  that
    12  the loft board properly concluded that the primary residence requirement
    13  in  the  statute is prospective from a determination of unit coverage or
    14  from registration of the unit with the loft board; that the  loft  board
    15  properly  considered  all relevant evidence and rejected a position that
    16  statements on tax returns alone are dispositive in making determinations
    17  regarding primary residence; that prior to Dashing  (2022)  neither  the
    18  courts  nor  the loft board has looked at statements made on tax returns
    19  as controlling when evaluating issues  of  primary  residence  for  loft
    20  tenants;  that  most  loft tenants use for business purposes significant
    21  portions of their lofts, which the loft law envisions as being legalized
    22  and covered as joint live/work spaces; and that it is necessary for  the
    23  legislature  to  correct  the misinterpretation in Dashing (2022) and to
    24  clarify, and to codify in the law, what has been loft board  policy  and
    25  precedent  based  on  the  current  law,  loft board rules, and the loft
    26  board's delegated expertise for evaluating primary residence  of  poten-
    27  tial protected occupants in possible interim multiple dwelling units.
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD14985-01-4

        A. 9783                             2
 
     1    §  2.  Paragraph  (i)  of subdivision 2 of section 286 of the multiple
     2  dwelling law, as amended by chapter 4 of the laws of  2013,  is  amended
     3  and a new subdivision 14 is added to read as follows:
     4    (i)  Prior  to compliance with safety and fire protection standards of
     5  article seven-B of this chapter,  residential  occupants  qualified  for
     6  protection pursuant to this article shall be entitled to continued occu-
     7  pancy,  provided that, subsequent to the finding of coverage by the loft
     8  board or a court of competent jurisdiction or registration with the loft
     9  board of the occupant's unit pursuant to this article, the unit is their
    10  primary residence, and shall pay the same rent,  including  escalations,
    11  specified in their lease or rental agreement to the extent to which such
    12  lease  or  rental  agreement  remains  in effect or, in the absence of a
    13  lease or rental agreement, the same rent most recently paid and accepted
    14  by the owner; if there is no lease or other rental agreement in  effect,
    15  rent  adjustments  prior  to  article  seven-B  compliance  shall  be in
    16  conformity with guidelines to be set by the loft board for such residen-
    17  tial occupants within six months from the effective date of  this  arti-
    18  cle.
    19    14.  In  determining whether a unit qualifies for coverage pursuant to
    20  this article, whether an occupant qualifies for  protection  under  this
    21  article, and/or whether a registered interim multiple dwelling unit is a
    22  protected occupant's primary residence for all purposes under this arti-
    23  cle,  no  single factor shall be solely dispositive and/or preclusive of
    24  such  determination,  including,  without  limitation,  statements  made
    25  and/or  actions taken in relation to federal, state or city tax returns.
    26  No waiver of rights otherwise protected by this subdivision, made  prior
    27  to  the  effective date of this subdivision, shall be accorded any force
    28  or effect.  Any landlord-tenant relationship severed  contrary  to  this
    29  subdivision  prior  to  the  effective date of this subdivision shall be
    30  restored to a tenant still in possession on such effective date.
    31    § 3. This act shall take effect immediately, and shall  apply  to  all
    32  pending actions or proceedings, including appeals.
Go to top