•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A07288 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A7288                 Revised 5/17/2023
 
SPONSOR: Weinstein
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the civil rights law, in relation to strategic lawsuits against public participation and to make technical corrections; and to amend chapter 250 of the laws of 2020 amending the civil rights law relating to actions involving public petition and participation, in relation to the application thereof   PURPOSE: To clarify that chapter 250 of the laws of 2020, enhancing anti-SLAPP protections, applied to cases pending on the effective date of the law, and to make other necessary changes to clarify anti-SLAPP procedures and the substantial basis standard.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: OF BILL: Section 1 clarifies the procedures for asserting a substantive anti-SLAPP cause of action and clarifies the substantial basis standard. Section 2 clarifies the definition of "public interest" and "substantial basis." Section 3 provides for the recovery of costs and attorney's fees on motion upon adjudication that a SLAPP had no substantial basis in fact or law and could not be supported by a substantial argument for the extension, modification or reversal of existing law. Section 4 provides technical changes to section 71 of the civil rights law. Section 5 clarifies that chapter 250 of the laws of 2020 applied to actions pending on the chapter's effective date. Section 6 provides that the act takes effect immediately and applies to actions and proceedings pending on or filed on or after November 10, 2020.   JUSTIFICATION: This legislation intends to clarify that chapter 250 of the laws of 2020, which reformed New York's anti-SLAPP statutes, applied to actions and proceedings pending on the chapter's effective date. While the legislative history and intent of the sponsor was clear that Chapter 250 applied to pending actions and proceedings, the Appellate Division in Gottwald v. Sebert, 203 A.D.3d 488 (1' Dept 2022) held otherwise. This bill would remedy that inconsistent decision, which circumvented the legislative intent of Chapter 250. This bill also makes several other changes to clarify the substantial basis standard and streamline various procedural aspects.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2021-2022: S.9239 (Hoylman) - S. Codes   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: None.   EFFECTIVE DATE: Immediately and applies to actions and proceedings pending on or filed on or after November 10, 2020.
Go to top