S02916 Summary:

BILL NOS02916
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORHELMING
 
COSPNSRBOYLE, ORTT
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §§70 & 240, add §240-d, Dom Rel L; add §§654 & 654-a, Fam Ct Act
 
Establishes a presumption of shared parenting of minor children in matrimonial and family court proceedings.
Go to top    

S02916 Actions:

BILL NOS02916
 
01/30/2019REFERRED TO CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
01/08/2020REFERRED TO CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
Go to top

S02916 Committee Votes:

Go to top

S02916 Floor Votes:

There are no votes for this bill in this legislative session.
Go to top

S02916 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          2916
 
                               2019-2020 Regular Sessions
 
                    IN SENATE
 
                                    January 30, 2019
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by  Sens.  HELMING,  BOYLE,  ORTT  -- read twice and ordered
          printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Children
          and Families
 
        AN ACT to amend the domestic relations law and the family court act,  in
          relation  to  establishing  a presumption of shared parenting of minor
          children in matrimonial and family court proceedings
 
          The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and  Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section  1.  Legislative  findings.  The  legislature hereby finds and
     2  declares that it is the public policy of the state to assure minor chil-
     3  dren have frequent and continuing contact with both  parents  after  the
     4  parents have separated or dissolved their marriage and that it is in the
     5  public  interest  to encourage parents to share the rights and responsi-
     6  bilities of child-rearing in order to effectuate  this  policy.  At  the
     7  outset  and  thereafter,  in  any proceeding where there is at issue the
     8  custody of a minor child, the court may,  during  the  pendency  of  the
     9  proceeding or at any time thereafter, make such order for the custody of
    10  minor  children  as may seem necessary or proper. The provisions of this
    11  act establish a presumption, affecting the burden of proof, that  shared
    12  parenting is in the best interests of minor children.
    13    §  2.  Subdivision (a) of section 70 of the domestic relations law, as
    14  amended by chapter 457 of the laws  of  1988,  is  amended  to  read  as
    15  follows:
    16    (a)   Where a minor child is residing within this state, either parent
    17  may apply to the supreme court for a writ of habeas corpus to have  such
    18  minor  child  brought  before such court; and on the return thereof, the
    19  court, on due consideration, [may] shall award the natural guardianship,
    20  charge and custody of such child to [either parent] both parents, in the
    21  absence of an allegation that such shared parenting would be detrimental
    22  to such child, for such time, under such regulations  and  restrictions,
    23  and  with  such  provisions and directions, as the case may require, and
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD04911-01-9

        S. 2916                             2
 
     1  may at any time thereafter vacate or modify such order.  [In  all  cases
     2  there  shall  be  no  prima  facie  right to the custody of the child in
     3  either parent, but the] The burden of proof that such  shared  parenting
     4  would  be  detrimental to such child shall be upon the parent requesting
     5  sole custody. The court shall determine solely  what  is  for  the  best
     6  interest  of  the  child,  and  what will best promote [its] the child's
     7  welfare and happiness, and make award accordingly.
     8    § 3. Paragraph (a) of subdivision 1 of section  240  of  the  domestic
     9  relations law, as amended by chapter 567 of the laws of 2015, is amended
    10  to read as follows:
    11    (a) (i) In any action or proceeding brought (1) to annul a marriage or
    12  to  declare  the nullity of a void marriage, or (2) for a separation, or
    13  (3) for a divorce, or (4) to obtain, by a writ of habeas  corpus  or  by
    14  petition  and order to show cause, the custody of or right to visitation
    15  with any child of a marriage, the court shall  require  verification  of
    16  the  status  of  any  child of the marriage with respect to such child's
    17  custody and support, including any prior orders, and shall enter  orders
    18  for custody and support as, in the court's discretion, justice requires,
    19  having  regard  to  the  circumstances of the case and of the respective
    20  parties and to the best interests  of  the  child  and  subject  to  the
    21  provisions  of  subdivision one-c of this section. Where either party to
    22  an action concerning custody of or a right to visitation  with  a  child
    23  alleges  in  a  sworn petition or complaint or sworn answer, cross-peti-
    24  tion, counterclaim or other sworn responsive  pleading  that  the  other
    25  party has committed an act of domestic violence against the party making
    26  the  allegation or a family or household member of either party, as such
    27  family or household member is defined in article  eight  of  the  family
    28  court  act,  and  such  allegations are proven by a preponderance of the
    29  evidence, the court must consider the effect of such  domestic  violence
    30  upon the best interests of the child, together with such other facts and
    31  circumstances as the court deems relevant in making a direction pursuant
    32  to  this  section  and  state on the record how such findings, facts and
    33  circumstances factored into the direction. If  a  parent  makes  a  good
    34  faith  allegation  based  on a reasonable belief supported by facts that
    35  the child is the victim of child abuse, child neglect, or the effects of
    36  domestic violence, and if that parent acts lawfully and in good faith in
    37  response to that reasonable belief to protect the child or  seek  treat-
    38  ment  for  the child, then that parent shall not be deprived of custody,
    39  visitation or contact with the child, or restricted in custody,  visita-
    40  tion  or  contact, based solely on that belief or the reasonable actions
    41  taken based on that belief. If an allegation that a child is  abused  is
    42  supported  by  a  preponderance  of  the  evidence, then the court shall
    43  consider such evidence of abuse in determining the  visitation  arrange-
    44  ment  that is in the best interest of the child, and the court shall not
    45  place a child in the custody of a parent who presents a substantial risk
    46  of harm to that child, and shall state on the record how  such  findings
    47  were  factored into the determination. Where a proceeding filed pursuant
    48  to article ten or ten-A of the family court act is pending at  the  same
    49  time  as a proceeding brought in the supreme court involving the custody
    50  of, or right to visitation with, any child  of  a  marriage,  the  court
    51  presiding  over  the proceeding under article ten or ten-A of the family
    52  court act may jointly hear the dispositional  hearing  on  the  petition
    53  under  article  ten or the permanency hearing under article ten-A of the
    54  family court act and, upon referral from the supreme court, the  hearing
    55  to resolve the matter of custody or visitation in the proceeding pending

        S. 2916                             3
 
     1  in the supreme court; provided however, the court must determine custody
     2  or visitation in accordance with the terms of this section.
     3    An  order  directing  the  payment  of child support shall contain the
     4  social security numbers of the named parties. [In all cases there  shall
     5  be  no  prima  facie right to the custody of the child in either parent.
     6  Such direction]
     7    (ii) Custody shall be awarded in the following  order  of  preference,
     8  according to the best interests of the child:
     9    (1) To both parents jointly pursuant to section two hundred forty-d of
    10  this article. In such cases the court must require the parents to submit
    11  a  parenting  plan  as defined in subdivision two of section two hundred
    12  forty-d of this article for implementation of the custody order  or  the
    13  parents acting individually or in concert may submit a custody implemen-
    14  tation  plan  to the court prior to issuance of a custody decree.  There
    15  shall be a presumption, affecting  the  burden  of  proof,  that  shared
    16  parenting  is  in the best interests of a minor child unless the parents
    17  have agreed to an award of custody to one parent or  so  agree  in  open
    18  court  at  a  hearing  for the purpose of determining custody of a minor
    19  child of the marriage or the court finds that shared parenting would  be
    20  detrimental  to  a  particular  child  of  a  specific marriage. For the
    21  purpose of assisting the court in  making  a  determination  whether  an
    22  award  of  shared parenting is appropriate, the court may direct that an
    23  investigation be conducted. If the court  declines  to  enter  an  order
    24  awarding  shared  parenting  pursuant to this paragraph, the court shall
    25  state in its decision the reasons for  denial  of  an  award  of  shared
    26  parenting.  In  jurisdictions  having  a  private  or publicly-supported
    27  conciliation service, the court or the parties may, at any time,  pursu-
    28  ant  to  local rules of the court, consult with the conciliation service
    29  for the purpose of assisting the parties to formulate a plan for  imple-
    30  mentation  of  the custody order or to resolve any controversy which has
    31  arisen in the implementation of a plan for custody. Any order for shared
    32  parenting may be modified or terminated upon the petition of one or both
    33  parents or on the court's own motion if it is shown that the best inter-
    34  ests of the child require modification  or  termination  of  the  shared
    35  parenting  order.  Any  order  for  the  custody  of  a minor child of a
    36  marriage entered by a court in this state or in any other state, subject
    37  to jurisdictional requirements, may be modified at any time to an  order
    38  of shared parenting in accordance with the provisions of this section.
    39    (2) To either parent, in which case, the court, in making an order for
    40  custody  to  either  parent  shall  consider, among other factors, which
    41  parent is more likely to  allow  the  child  or  children  frequent  and
    42  continuing  contact with the noncustodial parent, and shall not prefer a
    43  parent as custodian because of that parent's gender. The burden of proof
    44  that shared parenting would not be in the child's best interest shall be
    45  upon the parent  requesting  sole  custody.  Notwithstanding  any  other
    46  provision  of  law,  access  to  records and information pertaining to a
    47  minor child, including but not limited to  medical,  dental  and  school
    48  records,  shall  not be denied to a parent because the parent is not the
    49  child's custodial parent.
    50    (3) If to neither parent, to the person or persons in whose  home  the
    51  child has been living in a nurturing and stable environment.
    52    (4)  To any other person or persons deemed by the court to be suitable
    53  and able to provide a nurturing and stable environment.
    54    Before the court makes any order  awarding  custody  to  a  person  or
    55  persons other than a parent without the consent of the parents, it shall
    56  make a finding that an award of custody to a parent would be detrimental

        S. 2916                             4
 
     1  to the child and the award to a non-parent is required to serve the best
     2  interests  of  the  child.  Allegations  that  parental custody would be
     3  detrimental to the child, other than a statement of that ultimate  fact,
     4  shall  not  appear  in  the pleadings. The court may, in its discretion,
     5  exclude the public from the hearing on this issue. The court shall state
     6  in writing the reason for its decision and why the award made was  found
     7  to be in the best interests of the child. Any direction made pursuant to
     8  this subdivision shall make provision for child support out of the prop-
     9  erty  of  [either  or]  both parents. The court shall make its award for
    10  child support pursuant to subdivision one-b of this section. Such direc-
    11  tion may provide for reasonable visitation rights to the maternal and/or
    12  paternal grandparents of any child of the parties. Such direction as  it
    13  applies  to  rights of visitation with a child remanded or placed in the
    14  care of a person, official, agency or institution  pursuant  to  article
    15  ten of the family court act, or pursuant to an instrument approved under
    16  section three hundred fifty-eight-a of the social services law, shall be
    17  enforceable  pursuant  to  part eight of article ten of the family court
    18  act and sections three hundred fifty-eight-a and three  hundred  eighty-
    19  four-a of the social services law and other applicable provisions of law
    20  against any person having care and custody, or temporary care and custo-
    21  dy,  of the child. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any writ-
    22  ten application or motion to the court for the establishment,  modifica-
    23  tion  or  enforcement  of  a child support obligation for persons not in
    24  receipt of public assistance and care must contain either a request  for
    25  child  support enforcement services which would authorize the collection
    26  of the support  obligation  by  the  immediate  issuance  of  an  income
    27  execution  for  support  enforcement  as  provided  for by this chapter,
    28  completed in the manner specified in section one hundred eleven-g of the
    29  social services law; or a statement that the applicant has  applied  for
    30  or  is  in  receipt  of such services; or a statement that the applicant
    31  knows of the availability of such services, has declined  them  at  this
    32  time  and  where  support  enforcement  services pursuant to section one
    33  hundred eleven-g of the social services law have been declined that  the
    34  applicant  understands  that  an  income  deduction  order may be issued
    35  pursuant to subdivision (c) of section fifty-two  hundred  forty-two  of
    36  the civil practice law and rules without other child support enforcement
    37  services  and that payment of an administrative fee may be required. The
    38  court shall provide a  copy  of  any  such  request  for  child  support
    39  enforcement  services  to the support collection unit of the appropriate
    40  social services district any time it directs payments to be made to such
    41  support collection unit. Additionally, the  copy  of  any  such  request
    42  shall  be accompanied by the name, address and social security number of
    43  the parties; the date and place of the parties' marriage; the  name  and
    44  date  of birth of the child or children; and the name and address of the
    45  employers and income payors of the party  from  whom  child  support  is
    46  sought  or  from  the  party  ordered  to pay child support to the other
    47  party. Such direction may require the payment of a sum or sums of  money
    48  either directly to the custodial parent or to third persons for goods or
    49  services furnished for such child, or for both payments to the custodial
    50  parent  and  to  such  third persons; provided, however, that unless the
    51  party seeking or receiving child support has applied for or is receiving
    52  such services, the court shall not direct such payments to  be  made  to
    53  the  support  collection  unit,  as  established  in section one hundred
    54  eleven-h of the social services law. Every order directing  the  payment
    55  of support shall require that if either parent currently, or at any time
    56  in  the  future,  has  health  insurance  benefits available that may be

        S. 2916                             5
 
     1  extended or obtained to cover the child,  such  parent  is  required  to
     2  exercise  the  option  of additional coverage in favor of such child and
     3  execute and deliver to such person  any  forms,  notices,  documents  or
     4  instruments  necessary  to assure timely payment of any health insurance
     5  claims for such child.
     6    § 4. The domestic relations law is amended by  adding  a  new  section
     7  240-d to read as follows:
     8    §  240-d.  Custody of children. 1.  Where the court considers awarding
     9  shared parenting pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (a) of subdivi-
    10  sion one of section two hundred forty of this article,  "shared  parent-
    11  ing",  shall mean an order awarding custody of the child to both parties
    12  so that both parties share equally the legal responsibility and  control
    13  of  such child and share equally the living experience in time and phys-
    14  ical care to assure frequent and continuing contact with  both  parties,
    15  as the court deems to be in the best interests of the child, taking into
    16  consideration  the  location  and circumstances of each party.  The term
    17  "shared parenting" shall  be  considered  interchangeable  with  "nearly
    18  equal  shared  parenting".  An award of joint physical and legal custody
    19  obligates the parties to exchange  information  concerning  the  health,
    20  education  and  welfare of the minor child, and unless allocated, appor-
    21  tioned or decreed, the parents or parties shall confer with one  another
    22  in the exercise of decision-making rights, responsibilities and authori-
    23  ty.
    24    2. For the purposes of this article a "parenting plan", required to be
    25  submitted  to  the  court pursuant to clause one of subparagraph (ii) of
    26  paragraph (a) of subdivision one of section two hundred  forty  of  this
    27  article, shall include but not be limited to:
    28    (a) the legal responsibilities of each parent;
    29    (b) a weekly parenting schedule;
    30    (c) a holiday and vacation parenting schedule;
    31    (d) a schedule for special occasions, including birthdays;
    32    (e)  a  description  of  any  specific  decision making areas for each
    33  parent provided, however, that both parents  shall  confer  and  jointly
    34  determine  major  issues  affecting  the  welfare of the child including
    35  health, education, discipline and religion;
    36    (f) if applicable, the need for any and all of the parties to  partic-
    37  ipate in counseling;
    38    (g)  any restrictions on either parent when in physical control of the
    39  child or children; and
    40    (h) provisions for mediation of disputes.
    41    3. One parent may be designated as a public welfare recipient in situ-
    42  ations where public welfare aid is deemed necessary and appropriate.  In
    43  making an order of shared parenting, the court shall specify  the  right
    44  of each parent to the physical control of the child in sufficient detail
    45  to  enable  a parent deprived of that control to enforce the court order
    46  and to enable law enforcement authorities to implement laws  for  relief
    47  of parental kidnapping and custodial interference.
    48    §  5.  The  family court act is amended by adding a new section 654 to
    49  read as follows:
    50    § 654. Order of preference of custody awards. Custody shall be awarded
    51  in the following order of preference, according to the best interests of
    52  the child:
    53    (a) To both parents jointly. In such cases the court must require  the
    54  parents  to  submit  a  parenting  plan as defined in subdivision (b) of
    55  section six hundred fifty-four-a of this part for implementation of  the
    56  custody  order  or  the  parents  acting  individually or in concert may

        S. 2916                             6
 
     1  submit a custody implementation plan to the court prior to issuance of a
     2  custody decree. There shall be a presumption, affecting  the  burden  of
     3  proof,  that  shared parenting is in the best interests of a minor child
     4  unless  the  parents have agreed to an award of custody to one parent or
     5  so agree in open court at a  hearing  for  the  purpose  of  determining
     6  custody  of a minor child of the marriage or the court finds that shared
     7  parenting would be detrimental to  a  particular  child  of  a  specific
     8  marriage.  For  the  purpose of assisting the court in making a determi-
     9  nation whether an award of shared parenting is  appropriate,  the  court
    10  may direct that an investigation be conducted.  If the court declines to
    11  enter  an  order awarding shared parenting pursuant to this subdivision,
    12  the court shall state in its decision the reasons for denial of an award
    13  of shared parenting. In jurisdictions having a private or  publicly-sup-
    14  ported  conciliation service, the court or the parties may, at any time,
    15  pursuant to local rules of court, consult with the conciliation  service
    16  for  the purpose of assisting the parties to formulate a plan for imple-
    17  mentation of the custody order or to resolve any controversy  which  has
    18  arisen in the implementation of a plan for custody. Any order for shared
    19  parenting may be modified or terminated upon the petition of one or both
    20  parents or on the court's own motion if it is shown that the best inter-
    21  ests  of the child require the modification or termination of the shared
    22  parenting order. Any order for  the  custody  of  a  minor  child  of  a
    23  marriage entered by a court in this state or in any other state, subject
    24  to  jurisdictional requirements, may be modified at any time to an order
    25  of shared parenting in accordance with the provisions of this section.
    26    (b) To either parent, in which case, the court, in making an order for
    27  custody to either parent shall  consider,  among  other  factors,  which
    28  parent  is  more  likely  to  allow  the  child or children frequent and
    29  continuing contact with the noncustodial parent, and shall not prefer  a
    30  parent as custodian because of that parent's gender. The burden of proof
    31  that shared parenting would not be in the child's best interest shall be
    32  upon  the  parent  requesting  sole  custody.  Notwithstanding any other
    33  provision of law, access to records  and  information  pertaining  to  a
    34  minor  child,  including  but  not limited to medical, dental and school
    35  records, shall not be denied to a parent because the parent is  not  the
    36  child's custodial parent.
    37    (c)  If  to neither parent, to the person or persons in whose home the
    38  child has been living in a nurturing and stable environment.
    39    (d) To any other person or persons deemed by the court to be  suitable
    40  and able to provide a nurturing and stable environment. Before the court
    41  makes  any  order  awarding  custody to a person or persons other than a
    42  parent without the consent of the parents, it shall make a finding  that
    43  an  award  of  custody to a parent would be detrimental to the child and
    44  the award to a non-parent is required to serve the best interests of the
    45  child.  Allegations that parental custody would be  detrimental  to  the
    46  child,  other than a statement of the ultimate fact, shall not appear in
    47  the pleadings. The court may, in its discretion, exclude the public from
    48  the hearing on this issue. The court shall state in writing  the  reason
    49  for  its  decision  and  why  the award made was found to be in the best
    50  interests of the child.
    51    § 6. The family court act is amended by adding a new section 654-a  to
    52  read as follows:
    53    §  654-a. Custody of children.  (a) Where the court considers awarding
    54  shared parenting pursuant  to  the  provisions  of  subdivision  (a)  of
    55  section  six  hundred fifty-four of this part, "shared parenting", shall
    56  mean an order awarding custody of the child to both parties so that both

        S. 2916                             7
 
     1  parties share equally the legal responsibility and control of such child
     2  and share equally the living experience in time  and  physical  care  to
     3  assure  frequent  and continuing contact with both parties, as the court
     4  deems  to  be  in the best interests of the child, taking into consider-
     5  ation the location and circumstances of each  party.  The  term  "shared
     6  parenting",  shall  be  considered  interchangeable  with  "nearly equal
     7  shared parenting". An award of joint physical and  legal  custody  obli-
     8  gates  the parties to exchange information concerning the health, educa-
     9  tion and welfare of the minor child, and unless  allocated,  apportioned
    10  or  decreed, the parents or parties shall confer with one another in the
    11  exercise of decision-making rights, responsibilities and authority.
    12    (b) For the purposes of this part a "parenting plan", required  to  be
    13  submitted to the court, shall include but not be limited to:
    14    1. the legal responsibilities of each parent;
    15    2. a weekly parenting schedule;
    16    3. a holiday and vacation parenting schedule;
    17    4. a schedule for special occasions, including birthdays;
    18    5. a description of any specific decision making areas for each parent
    19  provided,  however, that both parents shall confer and jointly determine
    20  major issues affecting the welfare of the child including health, educa-
    21  tion, discipline and religion;
    22    6. if applicable, the need for any and all of the parties  to  partic-
    23  ipate in counseling;
    24    7.  any  restrictions on either parent when in physical control of the
    25  child or children; and
    26    8. provisions for mediation of disputes.
    27    (c) One parent may be designated as  a  public  welfare  recipient  in
    28  situations where public welfare aid is deemed necessary and appropriate.
    29  In  making  an  order  of  shared parenting, the court shall specify the
    30  right of each parent to the physical control of the child in  sufficient
    31  detail  to enable a parent deprived of that control to enforce the court
    32  order and to enable law enforcement authorities to  implement  laws  for
    33  relief of parental kidnapping and custodial interference.
    34    § 7. This act shall take effect on the first of November next succeed-
    35  ing  the  date  on  which  it shall have become a law and shall apply to
    36  actions and proceedings commenced on and after such date.
Go to top