A09068 Summary:
BILL NO | A09068B |
  | |
SAME AS | SAME AS S06693-B |
  | |
SPONSOR | Jaffee |
  | |
COSPNSR | Rivera N, Rivera P, Colton, Montesano, Boyland, Englebright, Kavanagh, Roberts, Hooper, Abinanti, Rosenthal |
  | |
MLTSPNSR | Brennan, Cook, Glick, Goodell, Lifton, Linares, Ortiz, Paulin, Reilly, Robinson |
  | |
Amd S6-108, Energy L | |
  | |
Mandates a study of energy-efficient and sustainable forms of power to replace power generated by Indian Point units 2 and 3. |
A09068 Actions:
BILL NO | A09068B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
01/20/2012 | referred to energy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
04/17/2012 | amend (t) and recommit to energy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
04/17/2012 | print number 9068a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/01/2012 | reported referred to ways and means | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/24/2012 | amend and recommit to ways and means | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/24/2012 | print number 9068b | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/18/2012 | reported referred to rules | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/18/2012 | reported | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/18/2012 | rules report cal.349 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/18/2012 | ordered to third reading rules cal.349 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/20/2012 | passed assembly | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/20/2012 | delivered to senate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/20/2012 | REFERRED TO RULES |
A09068 Floor Votes:
Yes
Abbate
No
Ceretto
Yes
Glick
Yes
Lentol
No
Murray
Yes
Ryan
Yes
Abinanti
Yes
Clark
Yes
Goldfeder
Yes
Lifton
Yes
Nolan
Yes
Saladino
No
Amedore
Yes
Colton
No
Goodell
Yes
Linares
No
Oaks
No
Sayward
Yes
Arroyo
ER
Conte
Yes
Gottfried
Yes
Lopez PD
Yes
O'Donnell
Yes
Scarborough
Yes
Aubry
Yes
Cook
Yes
Graf
Yes
Lopez VJ
Yes
Ortiz
Yes
Schimel
No
Barclay
No
Corwin
Yes
Gunther
No
Losquadro
No
Palmesano
Yes
Schimminger
Yes
Barrett
Yes
Crespo
No
Hanna
Yes
Lupardo
Yes
Paulin
Yes
Simanowitz
Yes
Barron
No
Crouch
No
Hawley
Yes
Magee
Yes
Peoples Stokes
Yes
Simotas
Yes
Benedetto
No
Curran
Yes
Heastie
Yes
Magnarelli
Yes
Perry
Yes
Skartados
No
Blankenbush
Yes
Cusick
Yes
Hevesi
Yes
Maisel
Yes
Pretlow
No
Smardz
Yes
Boyland
Yes
Cymbrowitz
Yes
Hikind
No
Malliotakis
Yes
Quart
Yes
Stevenson
Yes
Boyle
Yes
DenDekker
Yes
Hooper
Yes
Markey
Yes
Ra
Yes
Sweeney
Yes
Braunstein
Yes
Dinowitz
Yes
Jacobs
Yes
Mayer
No
Rabbitt
No
Tedisco
Yes
Brennan
No
Duprey
Yes
Jaffee
Yes
McDonough
Yes
Raia
No
Tenney
Yes
Brindisi
Yes
Englebright
ER
Jeffries
Yes
McEneny
Yes
Ramos
Yes
Thiele
Yes
Bronson
Yes
Espinal
No
Johns
Yes
McKevitt
No
Reilich
Yes
Titone
Yes
Brook Krasny
Yes
Farrell
No
Jordan
No
McLaughlin
Yes
Reilly
Yes
Titus
No
Burling
Yes
Finch
No
Katz
ER
Meng
Yes
Rivera J
Yes
Tobacco
No
Butler
No
Fitzpatrick
Yes
Kavanagh
No
Miller D
Yes
Rivera N
No
Walter
Yes
Cahill
No
Friend
Yes
Kearns
Yes
Miller JM
Yes
Rivera PM
Yes
Weinstein
No
Calhoun
Yes
Gabryszak
Yes
Kellner
Yes
Miller MG
Yes
Roberts
Yes
Weisenberg
Yes
Camara
Yes
Galef
Yes
Kolb
Yes
Millman
Yes
Robinson
Yes
Weprin
Yes
Canestrari
Yes
Gantt
ER
Lancman
Yes
Montesano
Yes
Rodriguez
Yes
Wright
Yes
Castelli
Yes
Gibson
Yes
Latimer
Yes
Morelle
Yes
Rosenthal
Yes
Zebrowski
Yes
Castro
No
Giglio
Yes
Lavine
Yes
Moya
Yes
Russell
Yes
Mr. Speaker
‡ Indicates voting via videoconference
A09068 Memo:
Go to topNEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)   BILL NUMBER: A9068B SPONSOR: Jaffee
  TITLE OF BILL: An act in relation to mandating a study of energy-ef- ficient and sustainable forms of power to replace power generated by Indian Point units 2 and 3   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: To evaluate existing and potential sources of energy in the event that Indian Point 2 and 3 should not be able to provide power at some future date. Such an evaluation will exam- ine the energy resourced and the most energy efficient and sustainable forms of power available in the event replacement power is necessary.   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: : Section 1. Legislative Intent and Findings. Section 2. Amends Section 6-108 of the energy law by adding a new subdi- vision 4 which mandates the board to conduct an additional study to evaluate the potential impact of closure and discontinuation of oper- ations of Indian Point Energy Centers 2 and 3. The study mush include, at a minimum, an assessment of each of the following: (a) an examination of strategies to replace energy otherwise produced by Indian Point; (b) the potential economic impacts, including but not limited to state and local tax revenues and employment directly and indirectly associated with the facility; (c) a plan for workforce redeployment; and (d) the potential environmental impacts. Section 3. The board must issue the report required in section two no later than March 31, 2013. Copies of the report must be provided to the Governor, Temporary President of the Senate, the Speaker of the Assem- bly, the Chair of the Senate Committee on Energy and Telecommunications and the Chair of the Assembly Committee on Energy. Section 4. Effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: There has been widespread discussion, most recently, and on the record, at a joint hearing of the Assembly Energy and Corpo- rations, Authorities, and Commissions Committees to evaluate how the 2000 kilowatts of electricity delivered by Indian Point 2 and 3 could be replaced were the plants to cease functioning. There are a number of scenarios under which decommissioning could occur. It is not the intent of this bill to speculate regarding any of those eventualities; this bill would only offer data that could inform leaders, the local power providers, and the public on the best available means of replacement energy. This would not be limited to energy sources but include delivery pathways as well. Without such a plan, a any closure, precipitous or otherwise, could leave the Hudson Valley and New York City area without a plan for provision of sufficient power. It should be noted that Indian Point 2 and 3 have sustained numerous closures without resulting in power short- ages to consumers, however those closures have been relatively short- term. Testimony at the January 12, 2012 hearing indicated that a number of viable alternatives exist to replace power generated by Indian Point 2 and 3.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: none   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Transferring power from one provider to another will not result in any expense to the State of New York.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately.
A09068 Text:
Go to top STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 9068--B IN ASSEMBLY January 20, 2012 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. JAFFEE, N. RIVERA, P. RIVERA, COLTON, MONTESANO, BOYLAND, ENGLEBRIGHT, KAVANAGH, ROBERTS, HOOPER, ABINANTI -- Multi- Sponsored by -- M. of A. BRENNAN, COOK, GLICK, GOODELL, LIFTON, LINARES, ORTIZ, PAULIN, REILLY, ROBINSON -- read once and referred to the Committee on Energy -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee -- reported and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT in relation to mandating a study of energy-efficient and sustain- able forms of power to replace power generated by Indian Point units 2 and 3 The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. Legislative intent and findings. The legislature hereby 2 acknowledges the uncertainty of future operations of the Indian Point 3 Energy Center in Buchanan, Westchester County, pending unresolved 4 issues, including New York state's issuance of a state pollutant 5 discharge elimination system permit pursuant to article 17 of the envi- 6 ronmental conservation law and a water quality certificate pursuant to 7 section four hundred one of the federal Clean Water Act and a reactor 8 license renewal by the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Due to the 9 uncertainty over the continued operation of Indian Point Energy Center's 10 reactors (IPEC 2 and IPEC 3) beyond 2013 and 2015 respectively, the 11 legislature declares the need for a comprehensive plan in the event the 12 facility is retired. The legislature further declares that the state 13 energy planning board, ("the board") established pursuant to article 6 14 of the energy law should be responsible for such study. 15 § 2. 1. In addition to the study required under subdivision 1 of 16 section 6-108 of the energy law, the board shall undertake a separate 17 study to evaluate the potential impact of the closure and discontinua- 18 tion of operations by IPEC 2 and IPEC 3. Such study shall include, at a 19 minimum, an assessment of each of the following: (a) an examination of 20 strategies to replace energy otherwise produced by Indian Point Energy EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [] is old law to be omitted. LBD13853-09-2A. 9068--B 2 1 Center. The assessment shall examine: (i) additional installed electric 2 generating capacity; (ii) distributed electric generation, especially 3 generation using renewable or innovative energy resources; (iii) intra- 4 state electric transmission system upgrades; (iv) demand response, ener- 5 gy conservation and efficiency; and (v) energy storage technologies 6 energy efficiency measures. 7 (b) the potential economic impacts, including but limited to state and 8 local tax revenues and employment directly and indirectly associated 9 with the facility. The assessment shall examine: (i) the municipalities 10 where the facility is located; (ii) the downstate region, as defined in 11 subdivision 2 of section 6-102 of the energy law; and (iii) New York 12 state. 13 (c) a plan for workforce redeployment. 14 (d) the potential environmental impacts. The assessment shall include: 15 (i) a site remediation plan; (ii) a plan for the removal, transportation 16 and disposal of nuclear waste stored at the site; and (iii) the imple- 17 mentation costs associated with the site remediation and nuclear waste 18 removal, transportation and disposal plans. 19 2. The board and any contractors it may retain for such purposes shall 20 consult with entities that have resources and expertise to assist in 21 such study, including, but not limited to, the BSO, federal agencies, 22 departments and commissions, public utilities, municipalities in the 23 region the facility is located and any other electric company or trade 24 organizations. 25 § 3. The board shall issue the report required in section two of this 26 act no later than March 31, 2013. Copies of such report shall be 27 provided to the governor, the temporary president of the senate, the 28 speaker of the assembly, the chair of the senate committee on energy and 29 telecommunications and the chair of the assembly committee on energy. 30 § 4. This act shall take effect immediately.