Amd §3638 & 3623-a, Ed L; amd Part A §35, Chap 56 of 2023
Requires every school district to conduct a transition feasibility analysis within the next succeeding school year as of the effective date of this act, and every five years thereafter, to determine the feasibility of using zero-emission school buses on current routes.
NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
BILL NUMBER: A6760B
SPONSOR: Woerner TITLE OF BILL:
An act to amend the education law, in relation to transition feasibility
analysis for zero-emission school buses; and to amend part A of chapter
56 of the laws of 2023 amending the education law relating to contracts
for excellence, in relation to the effectiveness thereof
PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL:
To require every school district to complete a transportation feasibil-
ity analysis by a specified date, and every five years thereafter;
prioritize allocated funding for the purchase of ZEBs and transmission
capacity and the design and construction of related infrastructure to
school districts with more than two thousand pupils based on specified
district characteristics; extend the outer deadline for transition by
small school districts with less than two thousand pupils and districts
with substantial feasibility issues to two thousand forty; and provide
transportation aid for transportation feasibility analyses, salary for a
zero-emission transportation transition planner, and costs incurred to
transport an out-of-service zero-emission bus for storage and repairs.
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:
Section one provides the legislative intent for the legislation.
Section two amends subdivision 1 of section 3638 of the education law to
include hybrid battery electric buses within the definition of "zero-em-
ission school bus".
Section three amends section 3638 of the education law to add new subdi-
visions 1-a and 1-b:
Subdivision 1-a requires every school district to complete a transition
feasibility analysis before the end of the next succeeding full school
year, or within fifteen months, as of the effective date of the subdivi-
sion, whichever is sooner, and every five years thereafter, to determine
which regular routes can feasibly be serviced by zero-emission school
buses. A transportation feasibility analysis completed within two years
preceding the adoption of the new subdivision also meets the requirement
of such subdivision.
Subdivision(1-a) also describes the parameters to be analyzed by the
study and clarifies the pupil population of a school district for
purposes of categorizing districts.
Subdivision (1-b) directs the education department, in consultation with
the New York state energy research and development authority (NYSERDA)
and department of health (DOH), to develop a list of school districts
with two thousand or more pupils which ranks district need for transpor-
tation and building aid for the purchase of zero-emission buses and
transmission capacity and the design and construction of related infras-
tructure based on an assessment of the district's current transition
feasibility analysis, the childhood asthma ER visit rate in the county
where the district is located (per DOH), the district's need/resource
capacity index rating (per SED), and average per pupil spending. SED
shall then prioritize allocated funding to the most high- need school
districts.
Section four amends paragraph (a) of subdivision 2 of section 3638 of
the education law to require every school district with two thousand or
more pupils to abide by the findings of its current transportation
feasibility analysis no later than July 1, 2030. School districts with
findings that indicate 50% or more of all regular routes are not deemed
feasible for service by zero-emission buses shall be permitted to
utilize non-zeroemission buses to make required transportation runs and
to receive transportation aid for such buses. School districts with
findings indicating that less than 50% of all regular routes are not
deemed feasible for service by zero-emission buses shall utilize zero-
emission buses for such regular routes and may utilize non-zero-emission
buses for the remaining regular routes.
Paragraph (a-2) is added to require every school district with less than
two thousand pupils to, no later than July 1, 2037, purchase or lease
only zero-emission school buses.
Paragraph (c) clarifies that a school district complies with section 2
if it has encumbered funds and places an order for a zero-emission bus
prior to July 1, 2030, even if it has not received delivery of such bus
before that date.
Paragraph (d) defines key terms.
Section five amends subdivision 3 of section 3638 of the education law
to require every school district with two thousand or more pupils to, no
later than July 1, 2037, operate and maintain only zero-emission school
buses and every school district with less than two thousand pupils to,
no later than July 1, 2040, operate and maintain only zero-emission
school buses.
Section six makes technical amendments to subdivision 4 of section 3638
of the education law.
Section seven amends subdivision 1 of section 3623-a(1) of the education
law by adding a new paragraph (a-1) to permit transportation aid for a
transition feasibility analysis required by section 3638 of the same
chapter.
Section eight amends section 3623-a(1)(e) by adding new paragraphs (1-a)
and (7-a) to permit transportation aid for salary for a zero-emission
transportation transition planner and costs incurred to transport an
out-ofservice zero-emission bus for storage and repairs, respectively.
Section nine extends the repeal date of section 3638 of the education
law by five years.
Section ten establishes the effective date.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ORIGINAL AND AMENDED VERSION (IF APPLICABLE):
The amended bill expands the definition of "zero-emission school bus" to
include hybrid battery electric buses and directs SED, in consultation
with NYSERDA and DOH, to develop a list of school districts with two
thousand or more pupils which ranks district need for transportation and
building aid for the purchase of zero-emission buses and transmission
capacity and the design and construction of related infrastructure based
on an assessment of the following: the district's current transition
feasibility analysis, the childhood asthma ER visit rate in the county
where the district is located (per DOH), the district's need/resource
capacity index rating (per SED), and average per pupil spending. Based
on such ranking, SED shall then prioritize allocated funding to the most
high-need school districts. Large districts with demonstrated feasibil-
ity challenges and districts with less than two thousand pupils will be
given additional time to complete their transitions, with the outer
deadline for transition extended to 2040.
JUSTIFICATION:
Feasibility issues related to the pace of technological advances, the
capacity of the state's power grid, and the impacts of weather and other
route conditions on zero-emission school buses (ZEBs) operated through-
out the state present significant challenges to school districts working
to transition their fleets in accordance with SED's first transition
deadline of July 1, 2027. For that reason, this legislation addresses
two separate concerns with current law. First, it directs all school
districts to complete a transition feasibility analysis to examine the
feasibility of the district's transition process and to update the anal-
ysis every five years. Second, for those districts with more than two
thousand pupils, the legislation directs SED, in conjunction with NYSER-
DA and DOH, to assess a defined group of district characteristics to
determine which districts shall receive prioritized transportation and
building aid for the purchase of additional transmission capacity and/or
ZEBs and the design and construction of related infrastructure.
Despite the multi-faceted transition challenges faced by some districts,
e.g., average low temperatures, topography and route distance vary wide-
ly across the state and substantially impact manufacturer's specifica-
tions and ZEB reliability, voters tend to focus exclusively on the vari-
able of cost. Unfortunately, while there have been steady price declines
in consumer electric vehicles since the transition deadlines were set in
2022, ZEBs still cost two to four times more than traditional internal
combustion engine (ICE) buses, and the average cost of a ZEB has
increased by 8.7%. In addition, three years ago experts forecast parity
between the total cost of ownership for ZEBs and ICEs to occur by 2027,
but now the forecast has extended to 2030 or beyond. Because the high
cost for adding transmission and charging infrastructure to accommodate
ZEBs falls predominantly on individual school districts, public support
for the transition frequently wanes when voters must choose between
spending limited budget dollars on educational expenses or for reducing
local tailpipe emissions. There is no real debate for many voters in
such a scenario, particularly for rural school districts that have low
pupil populations and lots of fresh air, but few resources and high
educational needs.
To promote a more effective transition with greater impact sooner, the
bill directs the state to initially concentrate allocated funding to
school districts with more than two thousand pupils and demonstrated
need. To determine need, SED, in consultation with NYSERDA and DOH, will
assess a district's transition feasibility analysis, the childhood asth-
ma emergency department (ER) visit rate in the county where a district
is located, a district's need/resource capacity index rating and its per
pupil spending, then prioritize transportation and building aid relief
for the purchase of additional transmission capacity and/or ZEBs and the
design and construction of related infrastructure to the most high-need
districts.
While most school district administrators support the transition to
ZEBs, the practical mechanics of the transition are challenging and
costly. Administrators and voters alike feel the limitations of their
local school district budgets, and as demonstrated by the thirty-one
districts across the state which have conducted ZEB votes, when put
"between a rock and a hard place" voters will consistently prioritize
educational spending over transportation spending, even when the commu-
nity's asthma health risks are high. Large districts with low per pupil
spending need financial assistance to help them accomplish the transi-
tion. The state can achieve the largest advances in public health in the
shortest amount of time if it initially prioritizes allocated funds to
districts with two thousand or more pupils, located in counties with
childhood asthma ER visit rates of "moderate" or "high" concern, rated
as no more than "average" by SED's need/resource capacity index, and
which spend less than $19,500 per pupil. As a result of such policy
priorities, large districts with demonstrated feasibility challenges and
districts with less than two thousand pupils will be given additional
time to complete their transitions in accordance with their current
transition feasibility analysis.
PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:
New bill.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS:
To be determined.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
This act shall take effect immediately.
STATE OF NEW YORK
________________________________________________________________________
6760--B
2025-2026 Regular Sessions
IN ASSEMBLY
March 12, 2025
___________
Introduced by M. of A. WOERNER, KAY, McDONALD, BUTTENSCHON, McDONOUGH,
MAHER, GRIFFIN -- read once and referred to the Committee on Education
-- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended
and recommitted to said committee -- again reported from said commit-
tee with amendments, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to
said committee
AN ACT to amend the education law, in relation to transition feasibility
analysis for zero-emission school buses; and to amend part A of chap-
ter 56 of the laws of 2023 amending the education law relating to
contracts for excellence, in relation to the effectiveness thereof
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-bly, do enact as follows:
1 Section 1. Legislative findings. The legislature finds that feasibil-
2 ity issues related to the pace of technological advances, the capacity
3 of the state's power grid, and the impacts of weather and other route
4 conditions on zero-emission school buses (ZEBs) operated throughout the
5 state present significant challenges to school districts working to
6 transition their fleets in accordance with the department of education's
7 (SED) first transition deadline of July 1, 2027. For that reason, this
8 legislation addresses two separate concerns with current law. First, it
9 examines the feasibility of each district's transition process. Second,
10 for those districts deemed to have the most feasible paths to transi-
11 tion, the legislation directs SED, in conjunction with the New York
12 state energy research and development authority (NYSERDA) and the
13 department of health (DOH), to assess a defined group of district char-
14 acteristics to determine which districts shall receive prioritized
15 transportation and building aid for the purchase of additional trans-
16 mission capacity and/or ZEBs and the design and construction of related
17 infrastructure.
18 With respect to an individual district's ability to comply with the
19 existing mandate, the legislation directs SED to require all school
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[] is old law to be omitted.
LBD09808-08-5
A. 6760--B 2
1 districts to complete a baseline transition feasibility analysis and to
2 repeat that process every five years. If a district's analysis deter-
3 mines that more than 50% of the district's regular bus routes are not
4 deemed feasible for service by zero-emission school buses, then the
5 district may maintain its existing fleet status quo until its next tran-
6 sition feasibility analysis. On the other hand, if a district's analy-
7 sis determines that more than 50% of the district's regular bus routes
8 are serviceable by zero-emission buses, then the district must comply
9 with the existing transition timeline for the percentage of regular
10 routes deemed feasible and may maintain the status quo for the
11 district's remaining non-feasible regular routes until the district
12 completes its next transition feasibility analysis. The outer deadline
13 for districts with substantial feasibility challenges to transition
14 their fleets will be 2040.
15 Despite the multi-faceted transition challenges faced by some
16 districts, e.g., average low temperatures, topography and route distance
17 vary widely across the state and substantially impact manufacturer's
18 specifications and ZEB reliability, voters tend to focus exclusively on
19 the variable of cost. Unfortunately, while there have been steady price
20 declines in consumer electric vehicles since the transition deadlines
21 were set in 2022, ZEBs still cost two to four times more than tradi-
22 tional internal combustion engine (ICE) buses, and the average cost of a
23 ZEB has increased by 8.7%. In addition, three years ago experts forecast
24 parity between the total cost of ownership for ZEBs and ICEs to occur by
25 2027, but now the forecast has extended to 2030 or beyond. Because the
26 high cost for adding transmission and charging infrastructure to accom-
27 modate ZEBs falls predominantly on individual school districts, public
28 support for the transition frequently wanes when voters must choose
29 between spending limited budget dollars on educational expenses or for
30 reducing local tailpipe emissions. There is no real debate for many
31 voters in such a scenario, particularly for rural school districts that
32 have low pupil populations and lots of fresh air, but few resources and
33 high educational needs.
34 To promote a more effective transition with a greater impact sooner,
35 the legislature finds that the state must initially concentrate the
36 funding allocated to the transition on school districts with more than
37 two thousand pupils. Within such group of school districts, the state
38 shall then assess which districts, based on their county's childhood
39 asthma ER visit rate, their transition feasibility analysis, SED's
40 need/resource capacity index rating and per pupil spending, shall be
41 prioritized to receive transportation and building aid relief for the
42 purchase of additional transmission capacity and/or ZEBs and the design
43 and construction of related infrastructure. Data indicates that, to
44 date, only thirty-one of New York state's seven hundred thirty-one
45 school districts have sought voter approval to purchase ZEBs. Voters in
46 eight of the thirty-one districts voted "no".
47 Upon review of all thirty-one school districts which voted, certain
48 patterns have emerged:
49 1. Districts with fewer than 2000 pupils voted "no" to ZEBs more
50 frequently. Of the eight school districts which voted "no" to ZEBs, six
51 have fewer than 2000 pupils and five of those six districts are rural
52 districts.
53 2. Rural districts with a "high" need/resource capacity index voted
54 "no" more frequently. Of the five rural school districts that voted
55 "no", SED categorizes four of those districts as "high" on its
A. 6760--B 3
1 need/resource capacity index, with the fifth district categorized as
2 "average".
3 3. DOH does not quantify childhood asthma ER visit rates as "high"
4 concern in the counties of most rural districts. Four of the five rural
5 school districts which voted "no" to ZEBs (with the exception of
6 Edwards-Knox Central School District in St. Lawrence County) are located
7 in counties of "low" concern for childhood asthma ER visit rates. (Per
8 DOH, St. Lawrence County is of "moderate" concern.) Of the six school
9 districts with less than 2000 pupils that voted "no", Mexico Central
10 School - located east of SUNY Oswego along Lake Ontario - was the only
11 suburban school district, however, it is located in a county with "low"
12 concern for childhood asthma ER visit rates.
13 Further patterns emerge when one contrasts the "no" votes with the
14 "yes" votes.
15 4. Districts with 2000 or more pupils voted "yes" to ZEBs more
16 frequently. Fourteen of the sixteen school districts with 2000 or more
17 pupils voted "yes" to ZEBs. In contrast, only nine of the fifteen school
18 districts with less than 2000 pupils voted "yes". When examining the two
19 districts with 2000 or more pupils which voted "no" - Churchville-Chili
20 Central School District, a suburban district southwest of the City of
21 Rochester, and Baldwinsville Central School District, a suburban
22 district northwest of the city of Syracuse - the votes initially appear
23 to be outliers, as each district has large pupil populations (of 3,688
24 and 5,444, respectively) and is located in a county with "moderate" to
25 "high" concern for childhood asthma ER visit rates. However, as noted
26 below, another characteristic of each of those two districts undoubtedly
27 plays a pivotal role in their voting results.
28 5. Districts with an "average" need/resource capacity index rating and
29 per pupil spending below $19,500 voted "no" to ZEBs. Each of the four-
30 teen districts with more than 2000 pupils which voted "yes" to ZEBs have
31 "low" or "average" need/resource capacity index ratings and spend more
32 than $19,500 per pupil. In contrast, the two large districts which voted
33 "no" - Churchville-Chili and Baldwinsville - each with "average"
34 need/resource capacity index ratings and high childhood asthma ER visit
35 rates, both spend less than $19,500 per pupil. Moreover, unlike small
36 districts which voted "yes" but which have "average" need/resource
37 capacity index ratings with per pupil spending exceeding $19,500, Bemus
38 Point central school district, a small district with an "average"
39 need/resource capacity index rating and less than $19,500 per pupil
40 spending, voted "no" to ZEBs.
41 While most school district administrators support the transition to
42 ZEBs, the practical mechanics of the transition are challenging and
43 costly. Administrators and voters alike feel the limitations of their
44 local school district budgets, and as demonstrated by ZEB votes across
45 the state, when put "between a rock and a hard place", voters will
46 consistently prioritize educational spending over transportation spend-
47 ing, even when the community's asthma health risks are high. Large
48 districts with low per pupil spending need financial assistance to help
49 them accomplish the transition. The state can achieve the largest
50 advances in public health in the shortest amount of time if it initially
51 prioritizes allocated funds to districts with 2000 or more pupils, no
52 more than an "average" need/resource capacity index rating, and per
53 pupil spending of less than $19,500. As a result of such policy priori-
54 ties, large districts with demonstrated feasibility challenges and small
55 districts with less than 2000 pupils will be given additional time to
A. 6760--B 4
1 complete their transitions in accordance with their current transition
2 feasibility analysis.
3 § 2. Subdivision 1 of section 3638 of the education law, as added by
4 section 1 of subpart A of part B of chapter 56 of the laws of 2022, is
5 amended to read as follows:
6 1. For the purposes of this section "zero-emission school bus" shall
7 mean a school bus that: is propelled by an electric motor and associated
8 power electronics which provide acceleration torque to the drive wheels
9 during normal vehicle operations and draws electricity from a hydrogen
10 fuel cell or battery; or otherwise operates without direct emission of
11 atmospheric pollutants, provided however that, notwithstanding the fore-
12 going, for the purposes of this section such term shall include a hybrid
13 battery electric bus with a second source of energy for propulsion.
14 § 3. Section 3638 of the education law is amended by adding two new
15 subdivisions 1-a and 1-b to read as follows:
16 1-a. The department shall require every school district to complete a
17 transition feasibility analysis before the end of the next succeeding
18 full school year, or within fifteen months, as of the effective date of
19 this subdivision, whichever is sooner, and every five years thereafter,
20 to determine which if any regular routes can feasibly be serviced by
21 zero-emission school buses, provided that existing feasibility studies
22 completed within the two years preceding the adoption of this subdivi-
23 sion shall meet the requirements of this subdivision. The analysis shall
24 assess each district's transportation needs, current bus routes and
25 alternative routes based on distance, topography, bridge and road
26 infrastructure, average low temperatures, and a minimum end-of-route
27 charge requirement of no less than twenty percent, consider the suffi-
28 ciency of the school district's electric transmission capacity and
29 infrastructure and assess the availability of and accessibility to state
30 and/or federal funding for the purchase of zero-emission school buses
31 and construction of associated infrastructure. For purposes of categor-
32 izing schools pursuant to this section, the pupil population of a school
33 district shall be the number most recently reported to the department or
34 the number used in the district's current transition feasibility analy-
35 sis, whichever is lower, and such number shall be deemed to remain
36 unchanged until updated in the school district's next succeeding transi-
37 tion feasibility analysis.
38 1-b. Within six months of the effective date of this subdivision and
39 annually thereafter, the department, in consultation with the New York
40 state energy research and development authority and department of
41 health, shall develop a list of school districts with two thousand or
42 more pupils and rank their need for transportation and building aid for
43 the purchase of zero-emission buses and transmission capacity and the
44 design and construction of related infrastructure based on an assessment
45 of each such district's current transition feasibility analysis, average
46 per pupil spending, the most recent department of health data regarding
47 the rate of emergency room visits for asthma per ten thousand persons
48 aged zero to seventeen in the county in which such school district is
49 located, and the needs/resource capacity group to which the commissioner
50 has assigned such school district. To maximize the effectiveness of the
51 state's limited pool of aid funding for the transition to zero-emission
52 school buses, the commissioner shall prioritize the award of such allo-
53 cated transportation and building aid to the high need school districts
54 whose transition will likely have the highest positive health impact on
55 the highest number of students.
A. 6760--B 5
1 § 4. Subdivision 2 of section 3638 of the education law, as added by
2 section 1 of subpart A of part B of chapter 56 of the laws of 2022, is
3 amended to read as follows:
4 2. (a) [No later than July first, two thousand twenty-seven, every]
5 Every school district with two thousand or more pupils shall, by no
6 later than July first, two thousand thirty, abide by the findings of the
7 district's current transition feasibility analysis, completed in accord-
8 ance with subdivision one-a of this section, as set forth in this subdi-
9 vision. If the findings of a school district's transition feasibility
10 analysis indicate that:
11 (i) [only purchase or lease zero-emission school buses when purchasing
12 or leasing new buses;
13 (ii) include requirements in any procurement for school transportation
14 services that any contractors providing transportation services for the
15 school district must only purchase or lease zero-emission school buses
16 when purchasing or leasing new school buses; and
17 (iii)] fifty percent or more of all regular routes are not deemed
18 feasible for service by zero-emission school buses, then the school
19 district may continue to operate, maintain or contract for non-zero-em-
20 ission school buses and receive transportation aid for non-zero-emission
21 school buses purchased or leased to make required transportation runs;
22 or
23 (ii) less than fifty percent of all regular routes are not deemed
24 feasible for service by zero-emission school buses, then the school
25 district (A) shall operate, maintain or contract for zero-emission
26 school buses and receive transportation aid for zero-emission school
27 buses purchased or leased for such regular routes as are deemed feasibly
28 serviceable by a zero-emission school bus or for an equivalent percent-
29 age of regular routes deemed feasible for service by such buses and (B)
30 may operate, maintain or contract for non-zero-emission school buses for
31 the remaining regular routes and receive transportation aid for non-
32 zero-emission school buses purchased or leased to make required trans-
33 portation runs for such remaining regular routes.
34 (a-1) With respect to any zero-emission school buses operated or main-
35 tained by a school district in accordance with the findings of the
36 district's current transition feasibility analysis as set forth in para-
37 graph (a) of this subdivision, such school district shall include
38 requirements in any procurement for the manufacturing or retrofitting of
39 a zero-emission school bus and charging or fueling infrastructure that
40 the components and parts used or supplied in the performance of the
41 contract or any subcontract thereto shall be produced or made in whole
42 or substantial part in the United States, its territories or possessions
43 and that final assembly of the zero-emission school bus and charging or
44 fueling infrastructure shall occur in the United States, its territories
45 or possessions.
46 (a-2) Every school district with less than two thousand pupils shall,
47 by no later than July first, two thousand thirty-seven:
48 (i) only purchase or lease zero-emission school buses when purchasing
49 or leasing new buses;
50 (ii) include requirements in any procurement for school transportation
51 services that any contractors providing transportation services for the
52 school district must only purchase or lease zero-emission school buses
53 when purchasing or leasing new school buses; and
54 (iii) include requirements in any procurement for the manufacturing or
55 retrofitting of a zero-emission school bus and charging or fueling
56 infrastructure that the components and parts used or supplied in the
A. 6760--B 6
1 performance of the contract or any subcontract thereto shall be produced
2 or made in whole or substantial part in the United States, its territo-
3 ries or possessions and that final assembly of the zero-emission school
4 bus and charging or fueling infrastructure shall occur in the United
5 States, its territories or possessions.
6 (b) The commissioner, in consultation with the New York state energy
7 research and development authority and office of general services, may
8 waive the contracting requirements set forth in [subparagraph (iii) of]
9 paragraph [(a)] (a-1) of this subdivision if the commissioner determines
10 that the requirements would not be in the public interest, would result
11 in unreasonable costs, or that obtaining such zero-emission school buses
12 and charging or fueling infrastructure components and parts in the
13 United States would increase the cost of a school district's contract
14 for zero-emission school buses and charging or fueling infrastructure by
15 an unreasonable amount, or such zero-emission school busses and charging
16 or fueling infrastructure components and parts cannot be produced, made,
17 or assembled in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available
18 quantities or of satisfactory quality. Such determination must be made
19 on an annual basis no later than December thirty-first, after providing
20 notice and an opportunity for public comment, and be made publicly
21 available, in writing, on the department's website with a detailed
22 explanation of the findings leading to such determination. If the
23 commissioner has issued determinations for three consecutive years that
24 no such waiver is warranted pursuant to this paragraph, then the commis-
25 sioner shall no longer be required to provide the annual determinations
26 required by this paragraph.
27 (c) Any school district which encumbers funds and places an order for
28 a zero-emission school bus prior to July first, two thousand thirty, but
29 which does not receive delivery of such bus before such date, shall be
30 deemed in compliance with the provisions of this subdivision.
31 (d) For the purpose of this subdivision, "regular routes" are defined
32 as daily runs to and from a student's home, child care or bus stop to
33 the district school. Routes to transport students off the primary
34 school campus for boards of cooperative educational services (BOCES)
35 programs, special education placements at a distance greater than thirty
36 miles from the district school and to transport homeless students and
37 students to and from extracurricular activities shall be deemed "non
38 regular" routes and exempted from any zero-emission school bus require-
39 ment pursuant to this chapter.
40 § 5. Subdivision 3 of section 3638 of the education law, as added by
41 section 1 of subpart A of part B of chapter 56 of the laws of 2022, is
42 amended to read as follows:
43 3. [No later than July first, two thousand thirty-five, every] (a)
44 Every school district with two thousand or more pupils shall, by no
45 later than July first, two thousand thirty-seven:
46 [(a)] (i) only operate and maintain zero-emission school buses; and
47 [(b)] (ii) include requirements in any procurement for school trans-
48 portation services that any contractors providing transportation
49 services for the school district must only operate zero-emission school
50 buses when providing such transportation services to the school
51 district.
52 (b) Every school district with less than two thousand pupils shall, by
53 no later than July first, two thousand forty:
54 (i) only operate and maintain zero-emission school buses; and
55 (ii) include requirements in any procurement for school transportation
56 services that any contractors providing transportation services for the
A. 6760--B 7
1 school district must only operate zero-emission school buses when
2 providing such transportation services to the school district.
3 § 6. Subdivision 4 of section 3638 of the education law, as added by
4 section 1 of subpart A of part B of chapter 56 of the laws of 2022, is
5 amended to read as follows:
6 4. A school district may apply to the commissioner, and the department
7 may grant a one-time extension of up to twenty-four months to comply
8 with the requirements of subdivision [two] three of this section. The
9 commissioner shall consider a school district's effort to meet the
10 requirements of subdivision [two] three of this section when granting an
11 extension, including but not limited to, procurement efforts made by the
12 school district, applications for state or federal funds, changes needed
13 to school district operations to meet the requirements of this section,
14 employee training, and receipt of technical assistance, if any. Upon a
15 school district receiving an extension, the New York state energy
16 research and development authority, in consultation with the department,
17 shall provide any additional technical assistance necessary to the
18 district to meet the requirements of subdivision [two] three of this
19 section.
20 § 7. Subdivision 1 of section 3623-a of the education law is amended
21 by adding a new paragraph a-1 to read as follows:
22 a-1. Zero-emission bus transition feasibility analysis, conducted
23 pursuant to subdivision one-a of section thirty-six hundred thirty-eight
24 of this article;
25 § 8. Paragraph e of subdivision 1 of section 3623-a of the education
26 law is amended by adding two new subparagraphs 1-a and 7-a to read as
27 follows:
28 (1-a) salary for a zero-emission transportation transition planner;
29 (7-a) costs incurred to transport an out-of-service zero-emission bus
30 for storage and repairs;
31 § 9. Subdivision 3 of section 35 of part A of chapter 56 of the laws
32 of 2023 amending the education law relating to contracts for excellence,
33 is amended to read as follows:
34 3. Section nineteen of this act shall expire and be deemed repealed
35 June 30, [2036] 2041; and
36 § 10. This act shall take effect immediately.
