•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A09280 Summary:

BILL NOA09280
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORHevesi
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §§422 & 427-a, Soc Serv L
 
Removes certain restrictions on the release of unfounded reports of alleged abuse or maltreatment reports for persons engaged in a bona fide research purpose.
Go to top    

A09280 Actions:

BILL NOA09280
 
11/21/2025referred to children and families
01/07/2026referred to children and families
01/12/2026reported
01/15/2026advanced to third reading cal.225
Go to top

A09280 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A9280
 
SPONSOR: Hevesi
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the social services law, in relation to removing research restrictions from certain unfounded reports of alleged abuse or maltreatment   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL:: This bill amends the social services law to allow individuals conducting research to access CPS reports of alleged abuse or maltreatment.   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS:: Section 1 of the bill amends subparagraphs (iv) and (v) of paragraph (a) of subdivision 5 of section 422 of the social services law, subpara- graph (iv) as amended by chapter 555 of the laws of 2000, and subpara- graph (v) as amended by chapter 256 of the laws of 2014 and adds a new subparagraph (vi). This amendment allows individuals conducting research to access CPS case data on unsubstantiated cases. Section 2 of the bill amends subparagraph (vii) of paragraph (d) of Subdivision 5 of section 427-a of the social services law, as amended by chapter 377 of the laws of 2011 and adds a new subparagraph (vii). This amendment allows individuals conducting research to access CPS case data on Family Assessment Response (FAR) cases. Section 3 of the bill establishes the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION:: Under current statute, New York draws a distinction between founded and unfounded cases in allowing individuals to request case information for bona fide research purposes. Based on a review of other state statutes limiting the release of child welfare records for research purposes, New York is unique in distinguishing between founded and unfounded cases (see, e.g., MCLA Sec. 711.627 (Michigan), CA Self & Inst. Code Sec. 10850 (California), OAC Sec. 5180:2-3321 (Ohio), NJSA Sec. 9:6-8.10a (New Jersey), YAMS Sec. 210.150 (Misiouri)). This bill allows researchers to analyze departmental case data more comprehensively, while maintaining the privacy of subjects in unfounded or unsubstantiated cases and FAR cases. Current law lists five scenarios under which unfounded or unsubstanti- ated case data may be accessed, but research is not one of them. The bill establishes "bona fide research purposes" as the sixth scenario. For privacy reasons, the bill guarantees that personal identifying information will be redacted unless it is absolutely essential to the research purpose and the department gives prior approval. Current law lists seven scenarios under which FAR case data may be accessed, but research is not one of them. The bill, as with unsubstan- tiated or unfounded cases, establishes "bona fide research purposes" as an additional qualifying scenario and creates privacy restrictions. Within just the last two years, governmental and non-governmental organ- izations have repeatedly encountered issues when requesting this data, significantly impacting their ability to generate research which accu- rately reflected the original goals of the projects. For example, 1) the NYC Center for Innovation Through Design sought this information to model potential policy shifts that could protect against ACS contact, but were unable to access information which may have contained negative, needless ACS interactions; 2) The NYC Family Policy Project's participa- tory action research study with CUNY (approved by both the city and state) needed to use a workaround which changed the study design because they could not access relevant case data; and 3) The YouthNPower guaranteed income research team had wanted to be able to report on all ACS contact that study participants and the control group had during the study year, but were not able to get a count that included all unfounded cases and CARES cases. This bill will remove a needless research restriction, protect the privacy of case subjects, and better allow governmental and non-govern- mental organizations to conduct research and develop policy proposals which will keep children and families safe.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:: New bill.   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:: None.   EFFECTIVE DATE:: This bill shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall have become a law.
Go to top

A09280 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          9280
 
                               2025-2026 Regular Sessions
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                    November 21, 2025
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced by M. of A. HEVESI -- read once and referred to the Committee
          on Children and Families
 
        AN  ACT  to  amend  the  social  services  law,  in relation to removing
          research restrictions from certain unfounded reports of alleged  abuse
          or maltreatment
 
          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section 1. Subparagraphs (iv) and (v) of paragraph (a) of  subdivision
     2  5  of  section  422  of  the  social  services law, subparagraph (iv) as
     3  amended by chapter 555 of the laws of  2000,  and  subparagraph  (v)  as
     4  amended  by  chapter  256  of  the  laws  of 2014, are amended and a new
     5  subparagraph (vi) is added to read as follows:
     6    (iv) to the subject of the report; [and]
     7    (v) to a district attorney, an assistant district attorney, an  inves-
     8  tigator  employed  in  the  office of a district attorney, or to a sworn
     9  officer of the division of state police, of  a  city,  county,  town  or
    10  village  police  department  or  of  a county sheriff's office when such
    11  official verifies that the report is  necessary  to  conduct  an  active
    12  investigation  or  prosecution  of  a  violation  of subdivision four of
    13  section 240.50 of the penal law[.]; and
    14    (vi) to any person engaged in a bona fide research purpose,  provided,
    15  however,  that no information identifying the subjects of the report and
    16  other persons named in  the  report  shall  be  made  available  to  the
    17  researcher unless it is absolutely essential to the research purpose and
    18  the department gives prior approval.
    19    §  2.  Subparagraph (vii) of paragraph (d) of subdivision 5 of section
    20  427-a of the social services law, as amended by chapter 377 of the  laws
    21  of  2011,  is  amended and a new subparagraph (viii) is added to read as
    22  follows:
    23    (vii) the subject of the report included in the records of the  family
    24  assessment and services track[.]; and

         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD14039-02-5

        A. 9280                             2
 
     1    (viii)  any  person engaged in a bona fide research purpose, provided,
     2  however, that no information identifying the subjects of the report  and
     3  other  persons  named  in  the  report and records created shall be made
     4  available to the researcher unless it is  absolutely  essential  to  the
     5  research purpose and the department gives prior approval.
     6    §  3.  This  act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall
     7  have become a law.
Go to top