•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A10044 Summary:

BILL NOA10044
 
SAME ASSAME AS S04980
 
SPONSORSolages
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §862, Gen Muni L
 
Expands the law to include the preservation of regionally significant projects with respect to agencies drawing on funds for new building projects.
Go to top    

A10044 Actions:

BILL NOA10044
 
01/30/2026referred to local governments
Go to top

A10044 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A10044
 
SPONSOR: Solages
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the general municipal law, in relation to the preserva- tion of regionally significant projects   PURPOSE: Relates to the preservation of regionally significant projects with respect to agencies drawing on funds for new building projects.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 amends the General Municipal Law to define regionally signif- icant projects. Regionally significant projects are defined as a location or facility (i) where the agency board has determined with the benefit of an independent third-party analysis of costs versus benefits that shows more benefits to the community than costs, that the project is likely to attract a significant number of visitors from outside the economic development region in which the project is located and that undertaking the project will serve the public purposes by preserving permanent, private sector jobs or increasing the overall number of permanent, private sector jobs in the state; and (ii) where the agency board makes a finding, prior to providing financial assistance to the project. Section 2. Is the enacting clause   JUSTIFICATION: Under current law, developers of retail businesses such as car dealer- ships and self-storage facilities are receiving tax breaks through a "tourism loophole" that exists in the statute. The resulting tax bene- fits do not stimulate sufficient local economic growth or net economic benefit to warrant the disbursement of public dollars for such projects. In Nassau County in particular, this loophole in the law is being readi- ly abused by businesses attracting customers from Queens County, and taxpayers are stuck with the bill. This bill closes the tourism loophole by requiring both the local Chief Executive Officer and the agency board where the project is located to determine that the project is likely to attract a significant number of visitors from outside the economic development region and that the project will preserve or increase permanent, private sector jobs within the state. These additional determinations will keep the economic bene- fits intended through the original legislation while preventing the granting of tax breaks without adequate justification.   EQUITY & COMMUNITY IMPACT: This legislation promotes equity by helping ensure that public financial assistance is directed toward projects that provide meaningful and meas- urable benefits to the broader community. Misuse of economic development incentives can reduce resources available for essential public services that many communities, including communities of color and low- and moderate-income residents, rely upon. By closing the tourism loophole and requiring stronger cost-benefit analysis and local oversight, this bill supports more accountable use of public resources and economic development practices that more fairly benefit residents, workers and taxpayers.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2021-22: A 7253 2019-20: A 7963   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None to the state   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately.
Go to top

A10044 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          10044
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                    January 30, 2026
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by M. of A. SOLAGES -- read once and referred to the Commit-
          tee on Local Governments
 
        AN ACT to amend the general municipal law, in relation to the  preserva-
          tion of regionally significant projects
 
          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:

     1    Section 1. Paragraph (a) of subdivision 2 of section 862 of the gener-
     2  al municipal law, as added by section 1 of part J of chapter 59  of  the
     3  laws of 2013, is amended to read as follows:
     4    (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this subdivision, no finan-
     5  cial  assistance  of  the  agency  shall  be  provided in respect of any
     6  project where facilities or property that are primarily used  in  making
     7  retail  sales  to customers who personally visit such facilities consti-
     8  tute more than one-third of the total project cost. For the purposes  of
     9  this  article,  "retail  sales"  shall  mean:  (i) sales by a registered
    10  vendor under article twenty-eight of the tax law  primarily  engaged  in
    11  the  retail  sale  of tangible personal property, as defined in subpara-
    12  graph (i) of paragraph four of subdivision (b) of section eleven hundred
    13  one of the tax law; or (ii)  sales  of  a  service  to  such  customers.
    14  Except,  however,  that  [tourism  destination]  regionally  significant
    15  projects shall not be prohibited by this subdivision. For the purpose of
    16  this paragraph, ["tourism destination"] "regionally significant project"
    17  shall mean a location or facility [which is likely to attract a  signif-
    18  icant number of visitors from outside the economic development region as
    19  established  by  section  two hundred thirty of the economic development
    20  law, in which the project is located] where: (i) the  agency  board  has
    21  determined  with  the  benefit of an independent third-party analysis of
    22  costs versus benefits that shows more benefits  to  the  community  than
    23  costs,  that  the  project  is likely to attract a significant number of
    24  visitors from outside the economic development region as established  by
    25  section two hundred thirty of the economic development law, in which the
    26  project  is  located  and  that  undertaking  the project will serve the
    27  public purposes of this article by preserving permanent, private  sector
    28  jobs  or increasing the overall number of permanent, private sector jobs
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD09872-01-5

        A. 10044                            2

     1  in the state; and (ii) where the agency  board  makes  such  a  finding,
     2  prior  to  providing  financial assistance to the project by the agency,
     3  the chief executive officer of the  city,  town  or  village  where  the
     4  project is located shall confirm the proposed action of the agency.
     5    § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
Go to top