•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A04578 Summary:

BILL NOA04578
 
SAME ASSAME AS S01432
 
SPONSORJensen
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Add §149, St Fin L
 
Allows for in-state suppliers to receive preference in certain situations when the state is awarding contracts.
Go to top

A04578 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A4578
 
SPONSOR: Jensen
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the state finance law, in relation to allowing for in-state suppliers to receive preference in certain situations when the state is awarding contracts   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: This bill will help in-state suppliers better compete in bids for New York State contracts,   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section 1: The state finance law is amended by adding a new section 148 to address the meanings of "State agency" and "existing in-state suppli- er." If a New York State-Contract bid by an in-state supplier is not more than 15 percent of the lowest responsible bid from an out-of-state supplier, the instate supplier will have the opportunity to match. Section 2: Provides the effective date   JUSTIFICATION: There has been a disturbing trend of New York State taxpayer money being spent to contract with out-of-state companies. Particularly, with so many in our business community struggling to stay afloat, bolstering the competitors of New. York businesses and the economies of other states is increasingly difficult to justify. Many in-state suppliers are already at a disadvantage because the cost of doing business in New York is largely attributed to onerous state government taxes, laws and regu- lations. This bill would allow in-state vendors who are within 15 percent of the lowest bid, the opportunity to match the lowest responsi- ble bid of an out-of-state supplier. Agencies would then have the oppor- tunity to give preference to the in-state bidder. This will also help address any potential abuse by in-state bidders, who think they have the advantage and can bid much higher than what a market rate may be for the product or service they are providing.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2023/24: A,5724 2022/21: S.5479-B Referred to Procurement and Contracts   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately.
Go to top