•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A06545 Summary:

BILL NOA06545C
 
SAME ASSAME AS S07263-A
 
SPONSORZaccaro
 
COSPNSRTapia, Raga, McDonough, Novakhov, Steck, Davila, Jacobson, Glick, Woerner, Miller, Brown K, Gallahan, Hyndman, Cunningham, Reyes, Yeger, Kassay, Shimsky, Pirozzolo, McDonald, Torres, Buttenschon, Sempolinski, Ra, Levenberg, Griffin, Gray, Manktelow, Chludzinski, Cook, Brook-Krasny, Norber, Wright, Forrest, McMahon, Lunsford
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Add §390-f, Gen Bus L
 
Imposes liability for damages caused by a chatbot impersonating certain licensed professionals.
Go to top

A06545 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A6545C
 
SPONSOR: Zaccaro
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the general business law, in relation to imposing liability for damages caused by a chatbot impersonating certain licensed professionals   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: This bill would prohibit an operator of a chatbot to knowingly permit such chatbot to impersonate an actual or fictitious practitioner of a covered profession in a manner that, if done by a natural person, would constitute unauthorized practice or unauthorized use of a professional title as a crime in relation to professions who licensure is governed by the education law or the judiciary law.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1. The general business law is amended to include a new section 390-f that defines artificial intelligence, generative artificial intel- ligence, chatbot, covered profession, operator and prohibits an operator of a chatbot to knowingly permit impersonate an actual or fictitious practitioner of a covered profession in a manner that, if done by a natural person, would constitute a crime under sections 6512 or 6513 of the education law in relation to a covered profession or would violate article 15 of the judiciary law prohibiting the practice or appearance of as an attorney-at-law without being admitted and registered under such article. An operator shall be deemd to know that a chatbot cannot lawfully practice a covered profession or appear as an attorney-at-law. Operators may not waive or disclaim this liability by notifying consum- ers that they are interacting with a non-human chatbot system, and an Operator shall not be liable where the impersonation is a result of a user intentionally circumventing the terms of service or the safeguards implemented by the operator to prevent such impersonation. Operators utilizing chatbots shall provide clear, conspicuous, and explicit notice to users that they are interacting with an artificial intelligence chat- bot program in the same language the chatbot is using and in a size easily readable by the average viewer and no smaller than the largest font size of other text appearing on the website on which the chatbot is utilized. The attorney general may bring an action against an operator that violates any unlawful practices in this section and may seek civil penalties of up to 15,000 dollars per day for a violation. The attorney general shall maintain a website to receive complaints, information or referrals from members of the public concerning violations of this section. Section 2. Effective date   JUSTIFICATION: Artificial intelligence (A.I.) has changed our world in more ways than we can imagine and continues to ever-evolve based on societal needs. According to a New York Times article published on February 24, 2025 titled Human Therapists Prepare for Battle Against A.I. Pretenders, the American Psychological Association warned that chatbots "failed to chal- lenge user's beliefs, even when they became dangerous; on the contrary they encouraged them," and added that if this advice was given by a human therapist those answers "could have resulted in the loss of a license to practice, or civil or criminal liability." This experience is not unique to users utilizing chatbots for therapy. One user asked a chatbot for medical advice, only to be given a fake doctor's name, but a doctor's real license number and other credentials to practice medicine. Another user who sought legal assistance acted upon the advice of a chatbot to reopen a lawsuit that was already settled and dismissed, including firing the user's lawyer and pursue the case using AI-generated motions and notices. These should not be viewed as isolated incidents, but rather are among a growing number of examples for why action is needed. This bill prohibits operators of A.I. chatbots from knowingly permitting the chatbot to impersonate an actual or fictitious practitioner of a covered profession in a manner that, if done by a natural person, would constitute unauthorized practice or unauthorized use of a professional title as a crime in relation to professions who licensure is governed by the education law or the judiciary law. The covered professions include Medicine, Dentistry, Veterinary Medicine, Physical Therapy, Pharmacy, Nursing, Podiatry, Optometry, Engineering, Land Surveying and Geology, Architecture, Psychology, Social Work, Mental Health Practitioners and Attorneys. Additionally, the Office of the Attorney General may bring an action against an operator of that violates any unlawful practices under the bill, seek civil penalties of up to fifteen thousand dollars per day for violations and maintain a website to receive complaints, information or referrals from members of the public concerning violations. This bill ensures professional advice is provided only by licensed human profes- sionals and not by artificial intelligence or chatbots.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: New bill   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: None   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall have become a law.
Go to top