•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A03661 Summary:

BILL NOA03661
 
SAME ASSAME AS S01168
 
SPONSORManktelow
 
COSPNSRGiglio JM, Sayegh, Miller, Smullen, Angelino, Hawley, DeStefano, Gallahan
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §140.00, Pen L
 
Permits owners of private property to post such property to prevent trespass by painting purple markings on trees or markers.
Go to top

A03661 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A3661
 
SPONSOR: Manktelow
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the penal law, in relation to posting private property   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: To provide a more cost-effective and long lasting alternative to tradi- tional "posted" signs as a means of demarcating one's property.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 amends subdivision 5 of section 140.00 of the penal law, as amended by chapter 698 of the laws of 1979, in order to include a provision allowing property owners to demarcate property lines through the use of purple paint as an alternative to displaying posted signs. Section 2 states that the department of agriculture shall establish a public information campaign in Order to distribute information on this new alternative and its requirements. Section 3 states the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: This bill would allow property owners to place purple paint markings on trees as an alternative to the current method of defining one's property through posted signs. The reasoning behind the existing law's provisions is rational, as most people would initially assume that the best way of conveying any sort of message is through the posting of a sign. However, as time has passed, it is clear to see that this conventional method comes with some faults, which this legislation seeks to amend. The prime defect of this technique of delineating property lines is a sign's abil- ity to be tampered with and/or removed completely. Trespassers can easi- ly vandalize these posted signs in a way which would free them of any accountability for unlawfully laying foot on another's property, most commonly in instances of hunting. Aside from the physical and timely demands of maintaining these signs, one must also consider the economic demands. The constant repair and/or reinstallation of these signs and fences add an extra, and burdensome, expense to property owners. Under this bill, this shortcoming of the standard posted sign is ultimately eliminated, or at the very least, dramatically lessens the likelihood of such obstruction occurring. In other states which have enacted similar legislation such as Illinois, Missouri, Arkansas and Texas, one can see this reduction of occurrences in action. In addition to this, a number of other states such as North Carolina, Maine, Florida, Idaho, Montana, Arizona and Kansas also have in place similar statutes with the slight difference in the use of color. However, researchers on the subject advOcate the specific use of the color purple as it stands out in .a natural setting, is not already used in the forestry industry and it is a hue that is recognizable for colorblind individuals.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2020-21: referred to codes 2021-22: held for consideration in coded   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: None.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect on the one hundred twentieth day after it shall have become a law in order to provide an appropriate window of time for the public to become familiar with this new method of demarca- tion.
Go to top