A07568 Summary:

BILL NOA07568
 
SAME ASSAME AS S03870
 
SPONSORKaminsky
 
COSPNSRSeawright
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd S190.30, CP L
 
Relates to rules of evidence at grand jury hearings.
Go to top    

A07568 Actions:

BILL NOA07568
 
05/19/2015referred to codes
01/06/2016referred to codes
05/04/2016enacting clause stricken
Go to top

A07568 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A7568
 
SPONSOR: Kaminsky
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to rules of evidence at grand jury hearings   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: Makes procedural changes to the criminal procedure law to allow certain evidence to be presented to a grand jury without the need for calling a live authenticating witness. Instead, a sworn affidavit or affirmation from a qualified person would be sufficient to allow all business records, the theft of personal identifying information, and electronic records and data to be considered as evidence by a grand jury.   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section 1 amends subdivision 2-a and subparagraph (ii) of paragraph (a) of subdivision 8 of section 190.30 of the criminal procedure law, subdi- vision 2a as amended by chapter 453 of the laws of 1999, and subpara- graph (ii) of paragraph (a) of subdivision 8 as added by chapter 279 of the laws of 2008, to Section 2 amends paragraph (g) of subdivision 3 of section 190.30 of the criminal procedure law, as added by chapter 690 of the laws of 2005, and adds two new paragraphs (h) and (i) to Section 3 establishes that this act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall have become a law.   JUSTIFICATION: Business Records: Current law allows certain business records of finan- cial institutions, telephone companies, and internet service providers to be admissible to a grand jury when accompanied by a sworn statement attesting to the authenticity of the records. This bill would expand existing law to include business records from other types of industries, including law firms, manufacturing companies, and technology companies. Identity Theft Victims: Existing law allows certain crime victims' testimony to be admitted to a grand jury via affidavit, specifically those whose testimony is limited to resolving the question of a legal right or status of the witness or his or her property (e.g. the owner of a stolen car, the owner of a burglarized home, or the owner of a credit card). The law does not currently include victims whose "personal iden- tifying information" or "personal identification number" have been stolen to submit testimony by affidavit, requiring victims to testify in person before a grand jury, even if they live in other cities, states, or countries. This bill would allow identity theft victims to submit testimony via affidavit. Electronic Data: Current law allowing the admission of certain business records via affidavit does not allow for the authentication of electron- ic data, such as the contents of e-mails, via affidavit. A live witness must appear before a grand jury to authenticate "recorded conversations or images communication thereby." Increasingly, prosecutors are handl- ing cases involving electronic data, such as e-mails, test messages, and social media posts that are housed on servers located around the world. For a live witness to authenticate such records, prosecutors often have to fly in the witness, and provide them with food and lodging, merely to authenticate that a CD-Rom or files provided to prosecutors are indeed the records produced by the company in response to the legal process. This bill would close that loophole and allow such electronic records to be submitted as testimony to a grand jury via affidavit. The procedural reforms in this bill are consistent with recommendations made by the District Attorneys Association of the State of New York's White Collar Crime Task Force in its 2013 report. The amendments contained in this bill would save significant taxpayer dollars, elimi- nate time-consuming requirements on government, businesses, grand jurors, and identity theft victims, while preserving defendants' rights to contest the accuracy and authenticity of the evidence. Doing so would permit prosecutors to investigate more complex white collar and cyber- crime cases, and comport New York State Law more closely with federal law and the laws of at least 26 other states.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: New bill.   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Savings to taxpayers for reimbursements of witnesses' travel, lodging, and food.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall have become a law.
Go to top

A07568 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          7568
 
                               2015-2016 Regular Sessions
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                      May 19, 2015
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced by M. of A. KAMINSKY -- read once and referred to the Commit-
          tee on Codes
 
        AN  ACT  to  amend  the  criminal procedure law, in relation to rules of
          evidence at grand jury hearings
 
          The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and  Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section  1.  Subdivision 2-a and subparagraph (ii) of paragraph (a) of
     2  subdivision 8 of section 190.30 of the criminal procedure law,  subdivi-
     3  sion  2-a as amended by chapter 453 of the laws of 1999 and subparagraph
     4  (ii) of paragraph (a) of subdivision 8 as added by chapter  279  of  the
     5  laws of 2008, are amended to read as follows:
     6    2-a. When the electronic transmission of a certified report, or certi-
     7  fied  copy  thereof, of the kind described in subdivision two or three-a
     8  of this section or a sworn  statement  or  copy  thereof,  of  the  kind
     9  described  in subdivision three of this section, or a business record as
    10  in rule forty-five hundred eighteen of the civil practice law and rules,
    11  results in a written document, such written document may be received  in
    12  such  grand  jury proceeding provided that: (a) a transmittal memorandum
    13  completed by the person sending the report contains a certification that
    14  the report has not been altered and a description of the report specify-
    15  ing the number of pages; and (b) the person who receives  the  electron-
    16  ically transmitted document certifies that such document and transmittal
    17  memorandum  were  so received; and (c) a certified report or a certified
    18  copy or sworn statement or sworn copy thereof is filed  with  the  court
    19  within  twenty  days  following arraignment upon the indictment; and (d)
    20  where such written document is a sworn statement or sworn  copy  thereof
    21  of  the  kind described in subdivision three of this section, such sworn
    22  statement or sworn copy thereof is also provided to the defendant or his
    23  counsel within twenty days following arraignment upon the indictment.
    24    (ii) financial transactions, and a person's  ownership  or  possessory
    25  interest  in  any  account,  at  a  bank,  insurance company, brokerage,
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD07255-02-5

        A. 7568                             2
 
     1  exchange or banking organization as defined in section two of the  bank-
     2  ing  law.  All records as defined in rule forty-five hundred eighteen of
     3  the civil practice law and rules may be  received  in  such  grand  jury
     4  proceedings as evidence of the facts stated or contained therein.
     5    §  2. Paragraph (g) of subdivision 3 of section 190.30 of the criminal
     6  procedure law, as added by chapter 690 of the laws of 2005,  is  amended
     7  and two new paragraphs (h) and (i) are added to read as follows:
     8    (g)  that person's ownership of, or possessory right in, a credit card
     9  account number or debit card account number, and the defendant's lack of
    10  superior or equal right to use or possession thereof[.];
    11    (h) that person's possessory right in "personal  identifying  informa-
    12  tion"  or  a  "personal  identification  number,"  as defined in section
    13  190.77 of the penal law, and the defendant's lack of superior  or  equal
    14  right to use or possession thereof;
    15    (i)  that  person's  qualifications as a custodian of records and data
    16  stored and maintained by an electronic communications service or  remote
    17  computing  service, and specified records and data before the grand jury
    18  are true and accurate copies of the records and data maintained  by  the
    19  custodian.
    20    §  3.  This  act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall
    21  have become a law.
Go to top