A09289 Summary:
BILL NO | A09289 |
  | |
SAME AS | SAME AS S06630 |
  | |
SPONSOR | Cymbrowitz |
  | |
COSPNSR | Englebright, Skoufis |
  | |
MLTSPNSR | |
  | |
  | |
Relates to any adoption by the department of environmental conservation of a management plan concerning mute swans. |
A09289 Actions:
BILL NO | A09289 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/12/2016 | referred to environmental conservation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/25/2016 | reported | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/26/2016 | advanced to third reading cal.410 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/04/2016 | passed assembly | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/04/2016 | delivered to senate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/05/2016 | REFERRED TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/08/2016 | SUBSTITUTED FOR S6630 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/08/2016 | 3RD READING CAL.1061 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/08/2016 | PASSED SENATE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/08/2016 | RETURNED TO ASSEMBLY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11/16/2016 | delivered to governor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11/28/2016 | signed chap.457 |
A09289 Committee Votes:
Go to topA09289 Floor Votes:
Yes
Abbate
Yes
Crespo
Yes
Gottfried
Yes
Lopez
Yes
Palumbo
Yes
Simon
Yes
Abinanti
Yes
Crouch
Yes
Graf
Yes
Lupardo
Yes
Paulin
Yes
Simotas
ER
Arroyo
Yes
Curran
Yes
Gunther
Yes
Lupinacci
Yes
Peoples-Stokes
Yes
Skartados
Yes
Aubry
Yes
Cusick
ER
Harris
Yes
Magee
Yes
Perry
Yes
Skoufis
No
Barclay
ER
Cymbrowitz
No
Hawley
Yes
Magnarelli
Yes
Pichardo
Yes
Solages
Yes
Barrett
Yes
Davila
Yes
Hevesi
Yes
Malliotakis
Yes
Pretlow
No
Stec
Yes
Barron
Yes
DenDekker
Yes
Hikind
Yes
Markey
Yes
Quart
Yes
Steck
Yes
Benedetto
Yes
Dilan
Yes
Hooper
Yes
Mayer
Yes
Ra
Yes
Stirpe
ER
Bichotte
Yes
Dinowitz
Yes
Hunter
Yes
McDonald
Yes
Raia
Yes
Tedisco
Yes
Blake
ER
DiPietro
Yes
Hyndman
Yes
McDonough
ER
Ramos
No
Tenney
Yes
Blankenbush
No
Duprey
Yes
Jaffee
Yes
McKevitt
Yes
Richardson
Yes
Thiele
No
Brabenec
Yes
Englebright
Yes
Jean-Pierre
Yes
McLaughlin
Yes
Rivera
Yes
Titone
Yes
Braunstein
Yes
Fahy
Yes
Johns
Yes
Miller
Yes
Robinson
Yes
Titus
Yes
Brennan
Yes
Farrell
Yes
Joyner
Yes
Montesano
Yes
Rodriguez
Yes
Walker
Yes
Brindisi
Yes
Finch
ER
Katz
Yes
Morelle
Yes
Rosenthal
No
Walter
Yes
Bronson
Yes
Fitzpatrick
Yes
Kavanagh
Yes
Mosley
Yes
Rozic
Yes
Weinstein
Yes
Buchwald
No
Friend
Yes
Kearns
Yes
Moya
Yes
Russell
Yes
Weprin
ER
Butler
Yes
Galef
Yes
Kim
Yes
Murray
Yes
Ryan
Yes
Williams
Yes
Cahill
ER
Gantt
ER
Kolb
No
Nojay
Yes
Saladino
Yes
Woerner
Yes
Cancel
Yes
Garbarino
No
Lalor
Yes
Nolan
Yes
Santabarbara
ER
Wozniak
No
Castorina
Yes
Giglio
Yes
Lavine
No
Oaks
Yes
Schimel
Yes
Wright
Yes
Ceretto
Yes
Gjonaj
No
Lawrence
Yes
O'Donnell
Yes
Schimminger
Yes
Zebrowski
Yes
Colton
Yes
Glick
Yes
Lentol
Yes
Ortiz
Yes
Seawright
Yes
Mr. Speaker
Yes
Cook
Yes
Goldfeder
ER
Lifton
Yes
Otis
Yes
Sepulveda
ER
Corwin
No
Goodell
Yes
Linares
Yes
Palmesano
ER
Simanowitz
‡ Indicates voting via videoconference
A09289 Memo:
Go to topNEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)   BILL NUMBER: A9289 SPONSOR: Cymbrowitz
  TITLE OF BILL: An act establishing a moratorium on the department of environmental conservation's plan to declare mute swans a "prohibited invasive species"; and providing for the repeal of such provisions upon expiration thereof   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: Imposes restrictions on the eradication of the mute swan population   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section 1 of the bill requires the department of environmental conserva- tion, prior to finalizing any management plan for mute swans, to hold not less than two public hearings and to respond to all public comments. In addition, any proposed management plan would be required to prior- itize non-lethal management techniques and indlude scientific evidence of projected and current environmental damage caused by the mute swan population of only 2,200 across the state. Section 2 establishes the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: Wildlife experts, rehabilitators and environmentalists' do not unan- imously agree that exterminating the mute swan population is justified. In addition, there is debate amongst such experts about whether the planned eradication of the mute swan population is even minimally bene- ficial to the eco-system or to our environment. Therefore, it is incum- bent on the Department of Environmental Conservation to illustrate the necessity of eradicating this non-native species by demonstrating the actual damage • to the environment or other species caused by mute swans.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2013-2014: A.8790.A/56589 Passed Both Houses, Vetoed Veto Message No. 543/2014 2015: A.3675/51555 Passed Both Houses, Vetoed, Veto Message No. 543/2015   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately and shall expire and be deemed repealed after such effective date.
A09289 Text:
Go to top STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 9289 IN ASSEMBLY February 12, 2016 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. CYMBROWITZ -- read once and referred to the Committee on Environmental Conservation AN ACT establishing a moratorium on the department of environmental conservation's plan to declare mute swans a "prohibited invasive species"; and providing for the repeal of such provisions upon expira- tion thereof The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. Prior to the adoption of any management plan for mute swans 2 (cygnus olor), a bird species for which the Atlantic flyway council has 3 issued a draft management plan, the department of environmental conser- 4 vation shall, after the effective date of this act, at a minimum, hold 5 not less than two public hearings in areas with mute swan populations, 6 following adequate public notice, and, after the last of such public 7 hearings, include a public comment period of not less than forty-five 8 days. Any such management plan shall at a minimum: 9 (a) give priority to non-lethal management techniques; 10 (b) fully document the scientific basis for future population projec- 11 tions; 12 (c) fully document the scientific basis for current and projected 13 environmental damage; 14 (d) include a public education component; and 15 (e) include responses to all substantive public comments. 16 § 2. This act shall take effect immediately and shall expire and be 17 deemed repealed two years after such effective date. EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [] is old law to be omitted. LBD06860-01-5