A10248 Summary:
BILL NO | A10248 |
  | |
SAME AS | SAME AS S07728 |
  | |
SPONSOR | Steck |
  | |
COSPNSR | |
  | |
MLTSPNSR | |
  | |
Amd §118, ABC L | |
  | |
Relates to clarifying the basis upon which the state liquor authority has the authority to revoke, suspend or cancel a license or permit by excluding perceived violations of the laws of other states unless the conduct falls within certain exceptions and established standards in statute for the delivery of beverage alcohol. |
A10248 Actions:
BILL NO | A10248 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/18/2016 | referred to economic development | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/01/2016 | reported referred to codes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/06/2016 | reported referred to rules | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/14/2016 | reported | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/14/2016 | rules report cal.308 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/14/2016 | ordered to third reading rules cal.308 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/15/2016 | passed assembly | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/15/2016 | delivered to senate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/15/2016 | REFERRED TO RULES | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/17/2016 | SUBSTITUTED FOR S7728 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/17/2016 | 3RD READING CAL.2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/17/2016 | PASSED SENATE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/17/2016 | RETURNED TO ASSEMBLY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10/26/2016 | delivered to governor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11/04/2016 | vetoed memo.223 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11/04/2016 | tabled |
A10248 Committee Votes:
Schimminger | Aye | Walter | Aye | ||||||
Gantt | Aye | Tedisco | Aye | ||||||
Cahill | Aye | Butler | Aye | ||||||
Magnarelli | Aye | Crouch | Aye | ||||||
Russell | Aye | Katz | Absent | ||||||
Lupardo | Aye | McLaughlin | Aye | ||||||
Bronson | Aye | DiPietro | Aye | ||||||
Jaffee | Nay | ||||||||
Simanowitz | Nay | ||||||||
Brindisi | Aye | ||||||||
Stirpe | Aye | ||||||||
Barrett | Aye | ||||||||
Skartados | Aye | ||||||||
Davila | Aye | ||||||||
Bichotte | Aye | ||||||||
Jean-Pierre | Aye | ||||||||
Walker | Aye | ||||||||
Barron | Aye | ||||||||
Hyndman | Aye | ||||||||
Lentol | Aye | Graf | Aye | ||||||
Schimminger | Aye | Giglio | Aye | ||||||
Weinstein | Nay | McKevitt | Aye | ||||||
Hevesi | Aye | Montesano | Aye | ||||||
Wright | Absent | Ra | Aye | ||||||
Pretlow | Aye | Tenney | Aye | ||||||
Cook | Aye | ||||||||
Cymbrowitz | Aye | ||||||||
Titus | Aye | ||||||||
O'Donnell | Aye | ||||||||
Lavine | Aye | ||||||||
Perry | Aye | ||||||||
Zebrowski | Aye | ||||||||
Abinanti | Aye | ||||||||
Weprin | Aye | ||||||||
Mosley | Aye | ||||||||
Heastie | Aye | Kolb | Aye | ||||||
Gottfried | Aye | Tedisco | Aye | ||||||
Lentol | Aye | Oaks | Aye | ||||||
Farrell | Aye | Butler | Aye | ||||||
Gantt | Aye | Crouch | Aye | ||||||
Nolan | Aye | Finch | Excused | ||||||
Weinstein | Aye | Barclay | Aye | ||||||
Hooper | Aye | Raia | Aye | ||||||
Ortiz | Aye | Duprey | Aye | ||||||
Pretlow | Aye | ||||||||
Cook | Aye | ||||||||
Glick | Aye | ||||||||
Morelle | Aye | ||||||||
Aubry | Aye | ||||||||
Englebright | Aye | ||||||||
Wright | Excused | ||||||||
Dinowitz | Excused | ||||||||
Colton | Aye | ||||||||
Magnarelli | Aye | ||||||||
Perry | Aye | ||||||||
Markey | Aye | ||||||||
Go to top
A10248 Floor Votes:
Yes
Abbate
Yes
Crespo
Yes
Gottfried
Yes
Lopez
Yes
Palumbo
Yes
Simon
Yes
Abinanti
Yes
Crouch
Yes
Graf
Yes
Lupardo
Yes
Paulin
Yes
Simotas
Yes
Arroyo
Yes
Curran
Yes
Gunther
Yes
Lupinacci
No
Peoples-Stokes
Yes
Skartados
Yes
Aubry
Yes
Cusick
Yes
Harris
Yes
Magee
Yes
Perry
Yes
Skoufis
Yes
Barclay
Yes
Cymbrowitz
Yes
Hawley
Yes
Magnarelli
Yes
Pichardo
Yes
Solages
Yes
Barrett
Yes
Davila
Yes
Hevesi
Yes
Malliotakis
Yes
Pretlow
Yes
Stec
No
Barron
Yes
DenDekker
Yes
Hikind
Yes
Markey
Yes
Quart
Yes
Steck
Yes
Benedetto
Yes
Dilan
Yes
Hooper
No
Mayer
Yes
Ra
Yes
Stirpe
Yes
Bichotte
No
Dinowitz
Yes
Hunter
No
McDonald
Yes
Raia
Yes
Tedisco
Yes
Blake
ER
DiPietro
Yes
Hyndman
Yes
McDonough
Yes
Ramos
Yes
Tenney
Yes
Blankenbush
Yes
Duprey
No
Jaffee
Yes
McKevitt
Yes
Richardson
Yes
Thiele
Yes
Brabenec
Yes
Englebright
Yes
Jean-Pierre
Yes
McLaughlin
Yes
Rivera
Yes
Titone
Yes
Braunstein
Yes
Fahy
Yes
Johns
Yes
Miller
Yes
Robinson
Yes
Titus
ER
Brennan
Yes
Farrell
Yes
Joyner
Yes
Montesano
Yes
Rodriguez
Yes
Walker
Yes
Brindisi
ER
Finch
Yes
Katz
Yes
Morelle
No
Rosenthal
Yes
Walter
No
Bronson
Yes
Fitzpatrick
Yes
Kavanagh
Yes
Mosley
No
Rozic
No
Weinstein
Yes
Buchwald
Yes
Friend
Yes
Kearns
Yes
Moya
Yes
Russell
Yes
Weprin
Yes
Butler
Yes
Galef
ER
Kim
Yes
Murray
Yes
Ryan
No
Williams
Yes
Cahill
Yes
Gantt
Yes
Kolb
Yes
Nojay
Yes
Saladino
Yes
Woerner
Yes
Cancel
Yes
Garbarino
Yes
Lalor
No
Nolan
Yes
Santabarbara
Yes
Wozniak
Yes
Castorina
Yes
Giglio
Yes
Lavine
Yes
Oaks
Yes
Schimel
Yes
Wright
Yes
Ceretto
No
Gjonaj
Yes
Lawrence
Yes
O'Donnell
Yes
Schimminger
Yes
Zebrowski
Yes
Colton
No
Glick
Yes
Lentol
Yes
Ortiz
Yes
Seawright
Yes
Mr. Speaker
Yes
Cook
Yes
Goldfeder
Yes
Lifton
Yes
Otis
Yes
Sepulveda
Yes
Corwin
Yes
Goodell
Yes
Linares
Yes
Palmesano
No
Simanowitz
‡ Indicates voting via videoconference
A10248 Memo:
Go to topNEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)   BILL NUMBER: A10248 SPONSOR: Steck
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the alcoholic beverage control law, in relation to clarifying the basis upon which the state liquor authority has the authority to revoke, suspend or cancel a license or permit by excluding perceived violations of the laws of other states unless the conduct falls within certain exceptions and establishes standards in statute for the delivery of alcoholic beverage   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: To amend the alcoholic beverage control law to clarify the State Liquor Authority's (SLA) legal authority to enforce what it perceives that the laws of other states require concerning any New York State issued license or permit. The bill provides that, with certain exceptions, the SLA cannot make any judgment as to the requirements of any other state as to a particular licensee/permittee until such licensee/permittee has exhausted its due process rights in such other state.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1. Amends subdivision 3 of section 118 of the alcoholic beverage control law by excluding conduct which the authority determines to be in violation of the laws of another state from the definition of "for cause" for purposes of the power to revoke, cancel, or suspend any license unless such conduct independently violates a specific provision of this chapter, due process of law has been provided by authorities of competent jurisdiction in such other state and the licensee or permittee has exhausted its due process rights and has been determined to have violated the laws of such other state, engaged in illegal sales to minors in another state or failed to pay properly owed taxes of another state. Section 2. Effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: The State Liquor Authority has fined, and could suspend, revoke or cancel the license of small businesses for "improper conduct" due to online, direct to consumer interstate wine shipments to state(s) that may have laws restricting such sales and shipments. It is concerning that the State Liquor Authority (SLA) is conducting enforcement activity on, behalf of other states, when these states have not requested their enforcement or intervention, nor has the New York merchant been found to have violated the law of those states. Additionally, a multitude of out-of-state interests are shipping alcoholic beverages into New York including interests from states where the SLA is attempting to use their laws against New York businesses. It appears that the SLA's enforcement of other states' laws against New York state businesses is a solely unique enforcement action by a state. The area of law the SLA is attempting to enforce is also vague consider- ing that 9NYCRR 53.1 (n) does not specifically list out-of-state ship- ments as constituting "improper conduct". While the SLA has used its authority under 9NYCRR 53.1 (n) in the past to appropriately sanction licensees for "improper conduct" involving the committing of felonies or serious misdemeanors, the notable difference in this case being that the New York merchant has not violated any provision of the New York State Alcoholic Beverage Law, or any SLA rule or regulation, nor has it been found to have violated such other state's law or regulation. The legis- lation clarifies that the SLA's authority does not extend to the enforcement of other states' laws with exceptions. Despite the troubling exercise by the SLA of enforcement authority of other states' laws against New York licensees, the legislation limits the refinement of the SLA's authority to permit the SLA to exercise authority over New York licensees for out of state conduct which inde- pendently constitutes a violation of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, conduct where a licensee has been found to violate another state's law provided that due process of law has been provided, sales to minors in other states, situations in which another state has notified a licensee that the conduct is a violation of that state's laws and the licensee continues to engage in the conduct and a demonstrated failure to pay other state taxes. These modifications address concerns raised with a prior version of the legislation.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: Similar legislation passed both houses in 2015 but was vetoed.   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None to the State of New York.   EFFECTIVE DATE: After 60 days.
A10248 Text:
Go to top STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 10248 IN ASSEMBLY May 18, 2016 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. STECK -- read once and referred to the Committee on Economic Development AN ACT to amend the alcoholic beverage control law, in relation to clar- ifying the basis upon which the state liquor authority has the author- ity to revoke, suspend or cancel a license or permit by excluding perceived violations of the laws of other states unless the conduct falls within certain exceptions and establishes standards in statute for the delivery of alcoholic beverage The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. Subdivision 3 of section 118 of the alcoholic beverage 2 control law, as added by chapter 536 of the laws of 1996, is amended to 3 read as follows: 4 3. (a) As used in this section, the term "for cause" shall also 5 include the existence of a sustained and continuing pattern of noise, 6 disturbance, misconduct, or disorder on or about the licensed premises, 7 related to the operation of the premises or the conduct of its patrons, 8 which adversely affects the health, welfare or safety of the inhabitants 9 of the area in which such licensed premises are located. 10 (b) As used in this chapter, the term "for cause" shall not include 11 conduct by a licensee outside New York or violations of another state's 12 laws or regulations unless: 13 (i) such conduct independently violates a specific provision of this 14 chapter; 15 (ii) the licensee or permittee is found guilty by authorities in 16 another state of violating such state's laws for having engaged in such 17 conduct provided that due process of law, including an opportunity to be 18 heard and present evidence, has been provided to the licensee or permit- 19 tee by authorities of competent jurisdiction in such other state; 20 (iii) the other state notifies the licensee that such conduct is a 21 violation of that state's law and, after having requested that the 22 licensee cease and desist from engaging in such conduct, the licensee 23 knowingly and repeatedly continues to engage in such conduct in the 24 other state; EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [] is old law to be omitted. LBD15453-01-6A. 10248 2 1 (iv) the licensee or permittee has knowingly engaged in illegal sales 2 to minors in another state; or 3 (v) the licensee has failed to pay taxes in such other state where 4 such taxes are shown to be properly owed by the licensee or permittee. 5 § 2. This act shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall 6 have become a law.