Palmesano To Governor: Proposal Does Not Reflect ‘Open For Business’

Local economic development officials need more tools, not less, to help foster economic development and job creation

“This proposal will be devastating to small businesses,” said Assemblyman Phil Palmesano (R,C,I-Corning) in a strongly worded letter to Gov. Andrew Cuomo urging him to reconsider a change to the sales tax benefit for local Industrial Development Agencies (IDAs). Under the governor’s budget proposal, the sales tax benefit would only be granted to Excelsior-qualified projects. “Gov. Cuomo has said we need to focus on improving the upstate economy, but limiting the sales tax benefit for IDAs would directly counter this goal,” said Palmesano. “Nearly 5,000 jobs would not have been saved or created in the counties of the 132nd Assembly District if the sales tax benefit had been limited to only Excelsior projects. It has been instrumental in driving investment and job growth in the Southern Tier and Finger Lakes regions, which has been vital to the fragile economic recovery in the region.” In his letter, Palmesano cited several examples of projects in his district that wouldn’t have been successful without the sales tax benefit. In Seneca County, 24 projects with investment of nearly $270 million, affecting 2,165 jobs, would not qualify under the proposed rules. In Steuben County, 20 projects, worth over $600 million and affecting over 2,000 jobs would not qualify under the new rules. Officials in Yates County, which has been one of the most active counties in the state for new company attractions and start-ups, said that not a single project would have qualified under the proposed rules. Palmesano stated in his letter to the governor, “… in the context of a $142 billion budget proposal, this item only represents $9 million in this fiscal year and $13 million when fully implemented. However, in my opinion, the negative impact this proposal will have on our upstate, rural region will be devastating, as the numbers I’ve provided demonstrate to you… I cannot stress enough the great concern this proposal has raised among not only economic development officials, but also local government leaders and the business community. This proposal will create another unnecessary burden that will hinder the ability for upstate, rural areas to improve the economic health of their business communities and quality of life. This proposal, coupled with the concerns which have been expressed to me, run counter to New York’s ‘Open for Business’ mantra.” “The Steuben County Industrial Development Agency applauds Assemblyman Palmesano and our other state elected officials for supporting the removal of the IDA limitations being proposed in Gov. Cuomo’s executive budget. The limitation of the sales tax benefit would have impacted over 20 projects in Steuben County, which totaled over $600 million in new investment and induced the creation of over 2,000 jobs in the last 10 years. In this tough economy we need to be doing everything within our power to attract new jobs and investment into our community instead of further limiting the ability to entice development in the Southern Tier,” said James C. Johnson, Executive Director of the Steuben County IDA. “Taking large economic development projects, like the CVS Distribution Center, that are eligible for the Excelsior Program to the Regional Council to get state sales tax abatements is not my concern,” said George Miner, President of the Chemung County IDA. “That’s just another layer of bureaucracy, on top of a mountain of layers required to do such a project in New York already. My concern is that the governor’s proposal excludes small businesses from receiving this economic development incentive that has been available to them for the past 40 years and is available in every other state in America. The governor’s proposal excludes projects that remove blight and revitalize our downtowns. I don’t know how much more small businesses can take. “The governor wants to dictate what economic development goes on in every town, village and city in New York. What’s important for Elmira may not be important for Syracuse and vice versa. New York State ranks at the bottom in every important economic category. This will just push us further in the hole.” “Governor Cuomo has been making great strides to make New York ‘Open for Business’ by promoting New York as having a more business-friendly environment, but this revision unfortunately is most definitely not business friendly. Adding restrictions to the types and sizes of business that could qualify for state sales tax incentives and inserting additional levels of needed government approvals does not lend itself to being open for business. As a rural community that is reliant on the success of our small businesses, this provision will definitely hamper our very successful efforts to help small businesses thrive,” said Steve Griffin, CEO of the Finger Lakes EDC. J. Kelsey Jones, Executive Director of the Schuyler County Partnership for Economic Development (SCOPED) pointed out, the governor has been quoted that he does not want to subsidize a company to move within the state and receive benefits. “I can assure you that not a single project in Schuyler County is the result of a move from one part of the state to another. We are a rural county and have never had a heavy manufacturing or commercial base, and since the Excelsior job incentives are targets that we cannot meet, we need the sales tax incentive for the redevelopment of historic properties that we have undertaken on the Main Streets of Watkins Glen and Montour Falls, New York. It is crucial that we be able to revitalize these commercial centers of activity, which we are successfully doing in coordination with New York Main Street Funding and other programs.” “These projects generate more sales tax for years into the future than what is foregone upfront. We shouldn't lose sight of the cost-benefit relationship,” said Bob Aronson, of the Seneca County IDA. A copy of Assemblyman Palmesano’s letter to Gov. Cuomo is attached with this release.


February 20, 2013
Hon. Andrew Cuomo, Governor
Executive Chamber
State Capitol
Albany, NY 12224 Kenneth Adams, President and CEO
Empire State Development
625 Broadway
Albany, NY 12207 Re: State sales tax benefit used by Industrial Development Agencies (IDAs) Dear Governor Cuomo and Mr. Adams: I am writing to express my strong concerns regarding your executive budget proposal which would restrict the use of the state sales tax benefits by local Industrial Development Agencies (IDAs) to Excelsior qualified projects only. Although, I understand your interest in making reforms to IDAs, I believe this proposal is the wrong approach at the wrong time and will have a detrimental impact on economic development and job creation in upstate New York. The 132nd Assembly District, which I represent, encompasses all or parts of five counties in the Southern Tier and Finger Lakes Region. The economic development officials working in these five counties have been intimately involved in economic development for many years in our region. Nobody understands the local economy and region, its challenges and opportunities better then these individuals. Their entire focus is trying to bring new business and development to our region while, at the same time, retaining those businesses which have already invested in our communities. You and I both know the challenges facing our economy, especially upstate. You, yourself have said we need to focus on improving the upstate economy. I agree wholeheartedly with you, which is why this budget proposal is counterproductive to that goal and I urge you to reconsider it. Let me share with you some feedback your proposal would have on projects in the five counties (Chemung, Schuyler, Seneca, Steuben and Yates) which make up the 132nd Assembly District: Chemung County - since 2010, 11 projects, totaling $59.4 million in investments and 85 jobs would not have qualified. Schuyler County - used incentives to get older buildings back on the tax rolls. One successful project – The Montour House – now hosts 27 employees, four different businesses and apartments in the upper floors. This has been a big help to help revitalize the downtown area and spurred other investments. Seneca County - 24 projects, $269.5 million in investments and 2,165 jobs would not have qualified under your proposal. Steuben County - 20 projects, $600 million in new investments, 278 jobs retained, 150 jobs created, and 1,791 jobs induced would not have qualified under your proposal. In addition, current projects in progress representing $40 million in new investment and 105 jobs created would not qualify. Yates County - Under these proposed rules, Yates county officials believe they would not have had a single project qualify for the state sales tax exemptions. Consider how significant this statement is when Yates County has been one of the most active counties in all of New York State in terms of new company attractions and start-ups. Governor Cuomo, in the context of a $142 billion budget proposal, this item only represents $9 million in this fiscal year and $13 million when fully implemented. However, in my opinion, the negative impact this proposal will have on our upstate, rural region will be devastating, as the numbers I’ve provided demonstrate to you. Our upstate rural counties need every economic development tool at its disposal. Actually, local economic development officials need more tools to assist them, greater flexibility and the ability to act quickly. This is critical to being able to attract and retain business. Therefore, I also believe requiring approval from local economic development councils is not helpful, in fact, I believe this just adds another bureaucratic and time- consuming step. I understand the concept of meeting regional and community goals, but I would also emphasize that nobody knows, understands and works towards these goals more productively than our local economic development officials. I cannot stress enough the great concern this proposal has raised amongst not only local economic development officials, but also local government leaders and the business community. This proposal will create another unnecessary burden that will hinder the ability for upstate, rural areas to improve the economic health of our business community and quality of life. This proposal, coupled with the concerns which has been expressed to me, run counter to New York’s “Open for Business” mantra. Therefore, I strongly urge you again, to reconsider your proposal and let’s work to provide our local economic development officials and local governments with more tools, flexibility and assistance so they can work to improve and grow our upstate economy. Sincerely,
Philip A. Palmesano
Member of Assembly PP/rkl Cc: Hon. Dean Skelos, Senate Temporary President & Majority Coalition Leader
Hon. Jeff Klein, Senate Temporary President & Majority Coalition Leader
Hon. Sheldon Silver, Assembly Speaker
Brian Kolb, Assembly Minority Leader
George Miner, STEG
Kelsey Jones, SCOPED
Robert Aronson, Seneca Co. IDA
James Johnson, Steuben Co. IDA