-  This bill is not active in this session.
 

A06836 Summary:

BILL NOA06836
 
SAME ASSAME AS S04594
 
SPONSORZebrowski (MS)
 
COSPNSRWeinstein, Titone, Weprin, Bronson, Cook, Jaffee, Markey, Stevenson
 
MLTSPNSRAbinanti, Colton, Galef, Montesano
 
Rpld & add S206, UCCA
 
Relates to an application for relief in aid of arbitration in a city court.
Go to top    

A06836 Actions:

BILL NOA06836
 
04/05/2011referred to judiciary
04/12/2011reported
04/28/2011advanced to third reading cal.232
05/04/2011passed assembly
05/04/2011delivered to senate
05/04/2011REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
06/16/2011SUBSTITUTED FOR S4594
06/16/20113RD READING CAL.448
06/16/2011PASSED SENATE
06/16/2011RETURNED TO ASSEMBLY
07/22/2011delivered to governor
08/03/2011signed chap.284
Go to top

A06836 Floor Votes:

DATE:05/04/2011Assembly Vote  YEA/NAY: 139/0
Yes
Abbate
ER
Clark
Yes
Goodell
Yes
Lentol
Yes
Murray
Yes
Saladino
Yes
Abinanti
Yes
Colton
Yes
Gottfried
Yes
Lifton
EL
Nolan
ER
Sayward
Yes
Amedore
Yes
Conte
Yes
Graf
Yes
Linares
Yes
Oaks
Yes
Scarborough
Yes
Arroyo
Yes
Cook
Yes
Gunther
Yes
Lopez PD
Yes
O'Donnell
Yes
Schimel
Yes
Aubry
Yes
Corwin
Yes
Hanna
Yes
Lopez VJ
Yes
Ortiz
Yes
Schimminger
Yes
Barclay
Yes
Crespo
Yes
Hawley
Yes
Losquadro
Yes
Palmesano
Yes
Schroeder
Yes
Barron
Yes
Crouch
Yes
Hayes
Yes
Lupardo
Yes
Paulin
Yes
Simotas
Yes
Benedetto
Yes
Curran
Yes
Heastie
Yes
Magee
ER
Peoples Stokes
Yes
Smardz
Yes
Bing
Yes
Cusick
ER
Hevesi
Yes
Magnarelli
Yes
Perry
Yes
Spano
Yes
Blankenbush
Yes
Cymbrowitz
Yes
Hikind
Yes
Maisel
Yes
Pheffer
Yes
Stevenson
Yes
Boyland
Yes
DenDekker
Yes
Hooper
Yes
Malliotakis
Yes
Pretlow
Yes
Sweeney
Yes
Boyle
Yes
Destito
ER
Hoyt
ER
Markey
Yes
Ra
Yes
Tedisco
Yes
Braunstein
Yes
Dinowitz
Yes
Jacobs
Yes
McDonough
Yes
Rabbitt
Yes
Tenney
Yes
Brennan
Yes
Duprey
Yes
Jaffee
Yes
McEneny
Yes
Raia
Yes
Thiele
Yes
Bronson
Yes
Englebright
Yes
Jeffries
Yes
McKevitt
Yes
Ramos
Yes
Titone
Yes
Brook Krasny
Yes
Farrell
Yes
Johns
Yes
McLaughlin
Yes
Reilich
Yes
Titus
Yes
Burling
Yes
Finch
Yes
Jordan
Yes
Meng
Yes
Reilly
Yes
Tobacco
Yes
Butler
Yes
Fitzpatrick
Yes
Katz
Yes
Miller D
Yes
Rivera J
Yes
Weinstein
Yes
Cahill
Yes
Friend
Yes
Kavanagh
Yes
Miller JM
Yes
Rivera N
Yes
Weisenberg
Yes
Calhoun
Yes
Gabryszak
Yes
Kellner
Yes
Miller MG
Yes
Rivera PM
ER
Weprin
Yes
Camara
Yes
Galef
Yes
Kirwan
Yes
Millman
Yes
Roberts
Yes
Wright
Yes
Canestrari
Yes
Gantt
ER
Kolb
Yes
Molinaro
Yes
Robinson
Yes
Zebrowski
Yes
Castelli
Yes
Gibson
Yes
Lancman
Yes
Montesano
Yes
Rodriguez
Yes
Mr. Speaker
Yes
Castro
Yes
Giglio
Yes
Latimer
Yes
Morelle
Yes
Rosenthal
Yes
Ceretto
Yes
Glick
Yes
Lavine
Yes
Moya
Yes
Russell

‡ Indicates voting via videoconference
Go to top

A06836 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          6836
 
                               2011-2012 Regular Sessions
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                      April 5, 2011
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by  M.  of A. ZEBROWSKI, WEINSTEIN, TITONE, WEPRIN, BRONSON,
          COOK, JAFFEE, MARKEY, STEVENSON -- Multi-Sponsored  by  --  M.  of  A.
          ABINANTI, COLTON, GALEF -- (at request of the Office of Court Adminis-
          tration) -- read once and referred to the Committee on Judiciary
 
        AN  ACT  to amend the uniform city court act, in relation to an applica-

          tion for relief in aid of arbitration in a city court
 
          The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and  Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section 1. Section 206 of the uniform city court act is REPEALED and a
     2  new section 206 is added to read as follows:
     3  § 206. Arbitration.
     4    (a)  Threshold questions under article seventy-five of the civil prac-
     5  tice law and rules. If an action of which the court has jurisdiction has
     6  been duly commenced therein, and there arise in such  action  any  ques-
     7  tions  relating to the arbitrability of the controversy, the court shall
     8  have jurisdiction completely to dispose of such  questions  and  article
     9  seventy-five  of  the  civil  practice law and rules shall be applicable

    10  thereto. But the court  shall  not  have  jurisdiction  of  the  special
    11  proceeding,  as  set  forth  in  subdivision (a) of section seventy-five
    12  hundred two of the civil practice law and rules, used to bring before  a
    13  court  the  first  application arising out of an arbitrable controversy,
    14  except as provided in subdivision (b) of this section.
    15    (b) Proceedings on award under article seventy-five of the civil prac-
    16  tice law and rules. Where a controversy has been duly arbitrated and  an
    17  award  made  therein is for relief which is within the court's jurisdic-
    18  tion, the court shall have jurisdiction of  proceedings  under  sections
    19  seventy-five  hundred  ten  through seventy-five hundred fourteen of the

    20  civil practice law and rules, relating to judicial recognition  of  such
    21  awards, which provisions shall be applicable thereto.
    22    (c)  Arbitration distinct from article seventy-five of the civil prac-
    23  tice law and rules. The rules may provide  systems  of  arbitration  and
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD09312-01-1

        A. 6836                             2
 
     1  conciliation of claims within the court's jurisdiction without reference
     2  to article seventy-five of the civil practice law and rules.
     3    §  2.  This  act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall
     4  become a law.
Go to top