S03516 Summary:

BILL NOS03516
 
SAME ASSAME AS A05144
 
SPONSORSTAVISKY
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
 
Authorizes Thomas Steier to be reclassified as a Tier II member of the New York city employees' retirement system.
Go to top    

S03516 Actions:

BILL NOS03516
 
02/11/2015REFERRED TO CIVIL SERVICE AND PENSIONS
06/11/2015COMMITTEE DISCHARGED AND COMMITTED TO RULES
06/11/2015ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.1487
06/25/2015RECOMMITTED TO RULES
01/06/2016REFERRED TO CIVIL SERVICE AND PENSIONS
Go to top

S03516 Committee Votes:

Go to top

S03516 Floor Votes:

There are no votes for this bill in this legislative session.
Go to top

S03516 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          3516
 
                               2015-2016 Regular Sessions
 
                    IN SENATE
 
                                    February 11, 2015
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by Sen. STAVISKY -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
          printed to be committed to the Committee on Civil Service and Pensions
 
        AN ACT to allow Thomas Steier to be reclassified as a Tier II member  of
          the New York City Employees' Retirement System
 
          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section 1. Notwithstanding any inconsistent provision of  law,  Thomas
     2  Steier,  a  member  of  the  New  York City Employees' Retirement System
     3  (NYCERS) with Tier III status, who was employed with the New  York  City
     4  Employees'  Retirement System (NYCERS) on July 6, 1976 until August 1978
     5  and was employed with the New York city transit  authority  from  August
     6  1978  to  February  2,  2013 when upon such date he retired, and who for
     7  reasons not ascribable to his own negligence was not offered  membership
     8  in  the  New York City Employees' Retirement System on July 6, 1976 as a
     9  Tier II member, shall, upon application filed with the Board of Trustees
    10  of NYCERS on or before the thirty-first day of December next  succeeding
    11  the date on which this act shall have become a law, be reclassified as a
    12  Tier  II member with July 6, 1976 as his date of membership and shall be
    13  entitled to every right, benefit and privilege  which  would  have  been
    14  available  to him in accordance with Tier II status, and the city of New
    15  York, as Thomas Steier's employer from July 6, 1976 until  August  1978,
    16  is  responsible for such error and shall be responsible for all costs to
    17  provide the Tier II benefit to Thomas Steier, provided,  however  Thomas
    18  Steier  shall  be  responsible  for  contributing  the  required  member
    19  contributions for Tier II membership.
    20    § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
          FISCAL NOTE. -- Pursuant to Legislative Law, Section 50:
          PROVISIONS OF PROPOSED LEGISLATION:  The  proposed  legislation  would
        authorize  the  New York City Employees' Retirement System ("NYCERS") to
        accept an application from Thomas Steier, a Tier IV NYCERS member   with
        Tier III rights, to be reclassified as a Tier II member.
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD04647-02-5

        S. 3516                             2
 
          BACKGROUND:  Mr.  Steier  was originally employed by NYCERS on July 6,
        1976 and would have been a Tier II member of NYCERS had  he  joined  the
        system prior to the establishment of Tier III on July 27, 1976. However,
        since he joined NYCERS on July 29, 1976 he is a Tier IV member with Tier
        III rights.
          Mr.  Steier  retired  on February 2, 2013 under the Tier IV basic 65/5
        retirement plan and began his pension at that time under the 100%  Joint
        and Survivor payment option with his wife as the beneficiary.
          The proposed legislation, if enacted, would authorize NYCERS to accept
        an  application from Mr. Steier on or before December 31 next succeeding
        the date on which this proposed legislation is enacted that would  allow
        him  to  be  reclassified  from  his current status as a retired Tier IV
        member to a retired Tier II member.
          This reclassification would provide Mr. Steier with the pension  bene-
        fits  that would have been available to him had he always been a Tier II
        member of NYCERS.
          The Effective Date of the proposed legislation would be  the  Date  of
        Enactment  but would allow for his retirement allowance to be recomputed
        as if he had always had Tier II membership status.
          FINANCIAL IMPACT - ACTUARIAL PRESENT VALUES: The  estimated  financial
        impact has been calculated based on the difference between (1) the bene-
        fits  Mr.  Steier  would  receive  as  a  Tier II member in the Modified
        Fifty-Five-Year Increased Service Fractional Plan ("ISF Plan") if   this
        proposed  legislation  were  enacted  and (2) the benefits Mr. Steier is
        currently entitled to receive as a Tier IV member  in  the  NYCERS  62/5
        plan.
          The  difference  in  estimated  costs (retroactive from his retirement
        date to June 30, 2015 and prospective on and  after  July  1,  2015)  is
        intended to provide a sense of the ultimate financial impact.
          If  the  legislation  is  enacted,  Mr.  Steier would be entitled to a
        pension of approximately $56,534 per year beginning  on  his  retirement
        date  of  February 2, 2013 under the 100% Joint and Survivor Option with
        his wife as his beneficiary. If the  legislation  is  not  enacted,  Mr.
        Steier  would  continue  to  be entitled to an annual pension of $38,955
        under the 100% Joint and Survivor Option that he elected.
          Based on the actuarial assumptions and methods described  herein,  the
        enactment  of  this  proposed  legislation  would increase the Actuarial
        Present Value ("APV") of Benefits ("APVB") and  the  Unfunded  Actuarial
        Accrued  Liability  ("UAAL")  of  NYCERS by approximately $249,000 as of
        June 30, 2015. This amount was calculated as shown in Table 1 below:
 
                                         Table 1
 
            Estimated Financial Impact of Reclassification for Thomas Steier
                   Retroactive from February 2, 2013 to June 30, 2015
                        And Prospective On and After July 1, 2015
 
        APV of Pension if        Retroactive    Prospective    Total
                                 Payments       Payments
        Legislation is Enacted   $ 136,000      $ 682,000      $ 818,000
        Legislation is Not       (94,000)       (475,000)      (569,000)
        Enacted
        Increase in APV          $ 42,000       $ 207,000      $ 249,000
          FINANCIAL IMPACT - ANNUAL EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS AND  ANNUAL  EMPLOYER
        COSTS:  In  accordance  with Section 13.638.2(k-2) of the Administrative
        Code of the City of New York ("ACNY"), new UAAL attributable to  benefit

        S. 3516                             3
 
        changes  are  to be amortized as determined by the Actuary but generally
        over the remaining working lifetime of those  impacted  by  the  benefit
        changes.
          For  this  proposed  legislation, Mr. Steier is inactive and therefore
        the entire increase in UAAL based on the Actuary's actuarial assumptions
        and methods in effect on June 30, 2013 rolled forward to June  30,  2015
        of $249,000 should be recognized immediately for contribution purposes.
          The  increase in employer costs would be comparable to the increase in
        employer contributions.
          CONTRIBUTION TIMING: If enacted during the  2015  Legislative  Session
        and  if his application for reclassification to Tier II were received by
        NYCERS on or before June 30, 2015, his status as a Tier II retiree would
        likely first be reflected in the June 30, 2015 census data.  In  accord-
        ance  with  the  One-Year  Lag  methodology  used  to determine employer
        contributions, increased employer contributions would be consistent with
        the increased employer costs and would be  determined  for  Fiscal  Year
        2017.
          If enacted during the 2015 Legislative Session, and if his application
        for  reclassification  to Tier II were received by NYCERS after June 30,
        2015 but on or before June 30, 2016, his status as  a  Tier  II  retiree
        would  likely  first  be  reflected in the June 30, 2016 census data and
        increased employer contributions would be  determined  for  Fiscal  Year
        2018.
          ACTUARIAL  ASSUMPTIONS  AND  METHODS:  The  additional  APVB  and UAAL
        presented herein have been calculated based on the actuarial assumptions
        and methods in effect for the June 30, 2013 (Lag)  actuarial  valuations
        used to determine Fiscal Year 2015 employer contributions of NYCERS.
          ECONOMIC  VALUES OF BENEFITS: The actuarial assumptions used to deter-
        mine the financial impact of the proposed legislation discussed in  this
        Fiscal  Note  are those appropriate for budgetary models and determining
        annual employer contributions to NYCERS.
          However, the  economic  assumptions  that  are  used  for  determining
        employer  contributions do not develop risk-adjusted, economic values of
        benefits.  Such risk-adjusted, economic values of benefits would  likely
        differ significantly from those developed by the budgetary models.
          STATEMENT OF ACTUARIAL OPINION: I, Robert C. North, Jr., am the Acting
        Chief Actuary for the New York City Retirement Systems. I am a Fellow of
        the Society of Actuaries and a member of the American Academy of Actuar-
        ies. I meet the Qualification Standards of the American Academy of Actu-
        aries to render the actuarial opinion contained herein.
          FISCAL  NOTE  IDENTIFICATION:  This  estimate is intended for use only
        during the 2015 Legislative Session. It is Fiscal  Note  2015-04,  dated
        February  5,  2015 prepared by the Acting Chief Actuary for the New York
        City Employees' Retirement System.
Go to top