S05894 Summary:

BILL NOS05894B
 
SAME ASSAME AS A07420-B
 
SPONSORLAVALLE
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Add Art 11 S160, Indian L
 
Establishes a procedure to evaluate the claim of the Montaukett Indians for acknowledgment as an Indian tribe by the state of New York.
Go to top    

S05894 Actions:

BILL NOS05894B
 
09/26/2011REFERRED TO RULES
11/30/2011AMEND (T) AND RECOMMIT TO RULES
11/30/2011PRINT NUMBER 5894A
01/04/2012REFERRED TO INVESTIGATIONS AND GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
04/20/2012AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO INVESTIGATIONS AND GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
04/20/2012PRINT NUMBER 5894B
05/31/20121ST REPORT CAL.976
06/04/20122ND REPORT CAL.
06/05/2012ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
06/21/2012COMMITTED TO RULES
Go to top

S05894 Floor Votes:

There are no votes for this bill in this legislative session.
Go to top

S05894 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                         5894--B
 
                               2011-2012 Regular Sessions
 
                    IN SENATE
 
                                   September 26, 2011
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by  Sen. LAVALLE -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
          printed to be  committed  to  the  Committee  on  Rules  --  committee
          discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted
          to  said  committee  -- recommitted to the Committee on Investigations
          and Government Operations in accordance with Senate Rule 6, sec. 8  --

          committee  discharged,  bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and
          recommitted to said committee
 
        AN ACT to amend the Indian law, in relation to establishing a  procedure
          to  evaluate the claim of the Montaukett Indians for acknowledgment as
          an Indian tribe by the state of New York
 
          The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and  Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section  1.  Legislative  findings.  The legislature hereby finds that
     2  historically it has granted  recognition  or  acknowledgment  to  Indian
     3  groups in the state of New York by an act of the legislature. There have
     4  not  been  any  objective  standards enacted to consider a request by an
     5  Indian group to obtain recognition by the state.  The Montaukett Indians
     6  seek to be acknowledged or recognized by the state.    Such  recognition

     7  and acknowledgement was questionably removed from the Montaukett Indians
     8  in  1910  in  the case of Pharaoh v. Benson, 69 Misc. Rep. 241 (Supreme,
     9  Suffolk Co., 1910) affirmed 164 App. Div. 51, affirmed 222 N.Y. 665 when
    10  the Montaukett Indians were declared to be extinct. In 1994,  the  State
    11  Supreme  Court,  in the case of Breakers Motel, Inc. v. Sunbeach Montauk
    12  Two, Inc., subsequently described the Pharoah case as  being  of  "ques-
    13  tionable  propriety".  It is the purpose of this act to establish objec-
    14  tive criteria for consideration of acknowledgment or  recognition  which
    15  may be used by the legislature in evaluating such request.
    16    §  2.  The Indian law is amended by adding a new article 11 to read as
    17  follows:
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD10689-05-2

        S. 5894--B                          2
 
     1                                 ARTICLE 11
     2                       EVALUATION OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF
     3                             MONTAUKETT INDIANS
     4  Section 160. Acknowledgment procedures.
     5    §  160. Acknowledgment procedures. 1. Acknowledgment of the Montaukett
     6  Indians may only be granted by an act of the legislature  in  compliance
     7  with the provisions of this section.
     8    2.  A  request  for  acknowledgment shall be initiated by a documented
     9  petition to the secretary of state containing detailed specific evidence

    10  to support the request. Such documented  petition  shall  be  certified,
    11  signed,  and dated by the governing body, stating that it is the group's
    12  official documented petition.
    13    3. The secretary of state shall evaluate the documented  petition  and
    14  submit  a  recommendation  to  the legislature regarding the approval or
    15  denial of acknowledgment based upon the criteria provided in subdivision
    16  four of this section.
    17    4. The secretary of state shall utilize  the  mandatory  criteria  for
    18  federal  acknowledgment  provided for in 25 CFR section 83.7 to evaluate
    19  the documented petition.
    20    5. The secretary of state shall promulgate rules  and  regulations  to
    21  implement  this  section within one hundred eighty days of the effective

    22  date of this section.  Such rules and regulations  shall  establish  the
    23  level  of  proof  and  documentation that shall be necessary to meet the
    24  mandatory criteria.
    25    § 3. Severability.   If any clause, sentence,  paragraph,  section  or
    26  part  of  this act shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdic-
    27  tion to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate
    28  the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in  its  operation  to  the
    29  clause,  sentence,  paragraph, section or part thereof directly involved
    30  in the controversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered.
    31    § 4. This act shall take effect immediately.
Go to top