S07801 Summary:
| BILL NO | S07801 |
|   | |
| SAME AS | SAME AS A09853 |
|   | |
| SPONSOR | GOLDEN |
|   | |
| COSPNSR | |
|   | |
| MLTSPNSR | |
|   | |
| Amd S76, Civ Serv L | |
|   | |
| Declares that all competitive class employees are entitled to collective bargaining with respect to matters pertaining to disciplinary procedures. | |
S07801 Actions:
| BILL NO | S07801 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|   | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06/10/2014 | REFERRED TO CIVIL SERVICE AND PENSIONS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06/18/2014 | COMMITTEE DISCHARGED AND COMMITTED TO RULES | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06/18/2014 | ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.1549 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06/18/2014 | PASSED SENATE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06/18/2014 | DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06/18/2014 | referred to codes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06/19/2014 | substituted for a9853 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06/19/2014 | ordered to third reading rules cal.497 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06/19/2014 | passed assembly | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 06/19/2014 | returned to senate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/30/2014 | DELIVERED TO GOVERNOR | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 02/02/2015 | POCKET VETO - VETO.589 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S07801 Floor Votes:
Yes
Abbate
Yes
Curran
Yes
Hawley
Yes
Markey
Yes
Quart
Yes
Steck
Yes
Abinanti
Yes
Cusick
ER
Heastie
Yes
Mayer
Yes
Ra
Yes
Stirpe
Yes
Arroyo
Yes
Cymbrowitz
Yes
Hennessey
Yes
McDonald
Yes
Raia
Yes
Sweeney
Yes
Aubry
Yes
Davila
Yes
Hevesi
Yes
McDonough
Yes
Ramos
Yes
Tedisco
Yes
Barclay
Yes
DenDekker
Yes
Hikind
Yes
McKevitt
Yes
Rivera
ER
Tenney
Yes
Barrett
Yes
Dinowitz
Yes
Hooper
Yes
McLaughlin
Yes
Roberts
Yes
Thiele
Yes
Benedetto
Yes
DiPietro
Yes
Jacobs
Yes
Miller
Yes
Robinson
Yes
Titone
Yes
Blankenbush
Yes
Duprey
Yes
Jaffee
Yes
Millman
Yes
Rodriguez
Yes
Titus
Yes
Borelli
Yes
Englebright
Yes
Johns
Yes
Montesano
Yes
Rosa
Yes
Walter
Yes
Braunstein
Yes
Fahy
Yes
Katz
Yes
Morelle
Yes
Rosenthal
Yes
Weinstein
Yes
Brennan
Yes
Farrell
Yes
Kavanagh
Yes
Mosley
Yes
Rozic
ER
Weisenberg
Yes
Brindisi
Yes
Finch
Yes
Kearns
Yes
Moya
Yes
Russell
Yes
Weprin
Yes
Bronson
No
Fitzpatrick
AB
Kellner
Yes
Nojay
Yes
Ryan
Yes
Wright
Yes
Brook-Krasny
Yes
Friend
Yes
Kim
Yes
Nolan
Yes
Saladino
Yes
Zebrowski
No
Buchwald
Yes
Galef
Yes
Kolb
Yes
Oaks
Yes
Santabarbara
Yes
Mr. Speaker
Yes
Butler
Yes
Gantt
Yes
Lalor
Yes
O'Donnell
Yes
Scarborough
Yes
Cahill
Yes
Garbarino
Yes
Lavine
Yes
Ortiz
Yes
Schimel
ER
Camara
Yes
Giglio
Yes
Lentol
Yes
Otis
Yes
Schimminger
Yes
Ceretto
Yes
Gjonaj
Yes
Lifton
Yes
Palmesano
Yes
Sepulveda
Yes
Clark
Yes
Glick
Yes
Lopez
Yes
Palumbo
Yes
Simanowitz
Yes
Colton
Yes
Goldfeder
Yes
Lupardo
Yes
Paulin
Yes
Simotas
Yes
Cook
Yes
Goodell
Yes
Lupinacci
Yes
Peoples-Stokes
Yes
Skartados
Yes
Corwin
AB
Gottfried
Yes
Magee
Yes
Perry
Yes
Skoufis
Yes
Crespo
Yes
Graf
Yes
Magnarelli
Yes
Pichardo
Yes
Solages
Yes
Crouch
Yes
Gunther
Yes
Malliotakis
Yes
Pretlow
Yes
Stec
‡ Indicates voting via videoconference
S07801 Text:
Go to topSTATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 7801 IN SENATE June 10, 2014 ___________ Introduced by Sen. GOLDEN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Civil Service and Pensions AN ACT to amend the civil service law, in relation to the negotiability of disciplinary procedures affecting employees in the competitive class of civil service of the state of New York or any civil division thereof The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. Legislative findings and declarations. The Taylor Law 2 requires collective bargaining over all "terms and conditions of employ- 3 ment." Our courts have often stressed the importance of this policy and 4 have made clear that "the presumption...that all terms and conditions of 5 employment are subject to mandatory bargaining" cannot easily be over- 6 come. In the Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of 7 New York, Inc. v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board, 6 8 N.Y. 3d 563 at 572 (2006) (Hereinafter NYC PBA case). However, while 9 paying homage to our state's strong and sweeping policy to support 10 collective bargaining of all terms and conditions of employment under 11 the Taylor Law, the Court of Appeals in the case cited above held that 12 that policy must yield to any other legislation which specifically 13 commits police discipline to the discretion of local officials, includ- 14 ing the New York City charter, the Rockland County Police Act, section 15 155 of the town law and section 8-804 of the village law, provided only 16 that those laws were passed prior to 1958 when Sections 75 and 76 of the 17 civil service law providing minimum or back-stop provisions for due 18 process disciplinary procedures for public employees were enacted. In 19 doing so, the court cited specifically to the first sentence of subdivi- 20 sion 4 of section 76 of the civil service law which says that sections 21 75 and 76 of the civil service law shall not be construed to repeal or 22 modify pre-existing laws relating to the removal or suspension of offi- 23 cers or employees in the competitive class of the civil service of the 24 state or any civil division. 25 Since the Taylor Law was enacted in 1967 making all terms and condi- 26 tions of employment subject to collective bargaining, matters pertaining EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [] is old law to be omitted. LBD15316-01-4S. 7801 2 1 to employee discipline, including disciplinary procedures, have been 2 negotiated into many collective bargaining agreements in municipalities 3 across the state covering all types of public employees, including 4 police officers. Those agreements were honored until 2006 when the NYC 5 PBA case was decided. The impact of the NYC PBA case has been to deprive 6 many, but not all, police officers of the right to enforce their negoti- 7 ated disciplinary procedures and of the right to collectively bargain 8 with regard to matters pertaining to discipline in the future that all 9 other public employees enjoy. The purpose of this act is to expressly 10 overrule this decision and those that have followed it and to replace 11 them with a legislative declaration that police officers and all other 12 competitive class public employees in the state of New York are entitled 13 to collectively bargain with respect to all matters pertaining to disci- 14 pline and, in the absence of a negotiated procedure, to at least the 15 minimum due process protections provided by sections 75 and 75 of the 16 civil service law. 17 § 2. Subdivision 4 of section 76 of the civil service law, as amended 18 by chapter 283 of the laws of 1972, is amended and a new subdivision 5 19 is added to read as follows: 20 4. [Nothing contained in section seventy-five or seventy-six of this21chapter shall be construed to repeal or modify any general, special or22local law or charter provision relating to the removal or suspension of23officers or employees in the competitive class of the civil service of24the state or any civil division. Such sections may be supplemented,25modified or replaced by agreements negotiated between the state and an26employee organization pursuant to article fourteen of this chapter.27Where such sections are so supplemented, modified or replaced, any28employee against whom charges have been preferred prior to the effective29date of such supplementation, modification or replacement shall continue30to be subject to the provisions of such sections as in effect on the31date such charges were preferred.] This section or section seventy-five 32 of this title shall be construed to repeal or modify any general, 33 special or local law or charter provision relating to the removal or 34 suspension of officers or employees in the competitive class of the 35 civil service of the state or any civil division. This section and 36 section seventy-five of this title may be supplemented, modified or 37 replaced by agreements negotiated between the state or any political 38 subdivision thereof and an employee organization pursuant to article 39 fourteen of this chapter. Where such sections are so supplemented, modi- 40 fied or replaced, any employee against whom charges have been preferred 41 prior to the effective date of such supplementation, modification or 42 replacement shall continue to be subject to the provisions of such 43 sections as in effect on the date such charges were preferred. 44 5. The terms of any current or expired collective bargaining agreement 45 or interest arbitration award between any public employer and any public 46 employee organization relating to any aspect of police officer disci- 47 pline which were invalidated or rendered unenforceable by any decision, 48 order or judgement of any court, administrative agency or other adjudi- 49 catory tribunal on grounds of public policy shall be deemed valid from 50 the date any such agreements or awards were first reached or issued, and 51 those agreements or awards shall be applied and enforced as to any 52 disciplinary charges pending on the effective date of this subdivision 53 and to any disciplinary charges filed thereafter. 54 § 3. This act shall take effect immediately.