•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A00710 Summary:

BILL NOA00710A
 
SAME ASSAME AS S00182-A
 
SPONSORHunter (MS)
 
COSPNSRReyes, Simon, Epstein, Clark, Mitaynes, Gonzalez-Rojas, Zinerman, Mamdani, Burgos, Ramos, Forrest, Kelles, Seawright, Jackson, Bichotte Hermelyn, Jean-Pierre, Davila, Dinowitz, Anderson, Rosenthal L, Meeks, Gallagher, Kim, Walker, Cruz, Hevesi, Steck, Carroll, Glick, Gibbs, Taylor, Rivera, Tapia, Cunningham, Cook, Lucas, Shrestha, Hyndman, Ardila, Raga, Simone, De Los Santos, Aubry, Bores, Levenberg, Lee
 
MLTSPNSRPretlow
 
Add §79-r, Civ Rts L
 
Provides a civil action for deprivation of rights which is caused by any person or public entity.
Go to top    

A00710 Actions:

BILL NOA00710A
 
01/11/2023referred to judiciary
03/30/2023amend and recommit to judiciary
03/30/2023print number 710a
01/03/2024referred to judiciary
Go to top

A00710 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A710A
 
SPONSOR: Hunter (MS)
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the civil rights law, in relation to providing a civil action for deprivation of rights   PURPOSE: The purpose of this legislation is to end the defense of qualified immu- nity for public officials when they deprive the rights of New Yorkers as well as to provide a state cause of action that may be brought by an injured individual and/or the Attorney General.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 adds a new section 79-R of the Civil Rights Law to end the defense of qualified immunity for certain defendants acting under color of law. This section also provides a state cause of action for the deprivation of rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the federal or state Constitution or laws. The court shall award reasonable attorney fees and costs to the prevailing plaintiff, and may award reasonable costs and attorney fees for a prevailing defendant but only for defend- ing any claims the court finds frivolous. Additionally, the Attorney General may bring a civil action for relief on behalf of the state and the injured party but an action brought by the Attorney General does not foreclose an injured party from bringing an action. If the Attorney General prevails, the court shall order any award of damages to the injured party. Qualified immunity or a defendant's good faith but erro- neous belief in the lawfulness of their conduct shall not be a defense. A civil action under this section must commence within three years of the cause of action. Lastly, a public entity shall indemnify its public employees for any liability incurred by the employee and for any judg- ment entered against the employee for claims arising under this section. A "public entity" is the state, any county, city and county, Municipality, and every other political subdivision of the state; and any private entity that engages in state action Immunity for corrections officers under Subdivision 1 of Section 24 of the Correction Law shall not apply to actions brought pursuant to this section. Actions brought pursuant to this section may be brought in any court of compe- tent jurisdiction. Section 2 is the severability clause. Section 3 is the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: For more than five decades, public officials have had extraordinary leeway in how they performed their jobs. As we see across America today, qualified immunity has far too often given the public officials license to violate a person's civil rights without any form of accountability, even during the most routine encounters. Qualified immunity was granted to law enforcement by the U.S. Supreme Court and then further strengthened.(1) As New York State is a leader in legal reform, we must continue this progress as our streets have been filled with massive protests against unaccountable state power. It is time to untangle the web of misconduct that has been shielded by the extraordinary protection granted by qualified immunity. In a New York Times article, a report was cited by the Mapping Police Violence organization.(2) Based on their study of data, "of the 1,147 people killed by the police in 2017, officers were charged with a crime in 13 of those cases, or about one percent." This startling statistic, for example, points to the protection that qualified immunity has given law enforcement even in the most suspect of cases where officers have acted with impunity. We must be part of the national movement to stop unaccountable actions by public officials when they violate our constitutional rights. We have the opportunity to join other states that have passed laws to hold public officials accountable for when they violate a person's constitu- tional rights.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2019-2020: S.8668-B - Amend and recommit to Rules/A.10978 - Referred to Governmental Operations. 2021-2022: S.1991 - Referred to Investigations and Government Operations/A.4331 - Referred to Judiciary   STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: To be determined.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately. 1 Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. (1982); Malley v. Briggs, 457 U.S. 335 (1986); Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635 (1987); Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001); Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009); Safford v. Redding, 557 U.S. 364 (2009). 2 Hailey Fuchs, Qualified Immunity Protection for Police Emerges as Flash Point Amid Protests, N.Y. Times, July 20, 2020, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/23/us/politics/qualified-immunitv.html.
Go to top

A00710 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                         710--A
 
                               2023-2024 Regular Sessions
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                    January 11, 2023
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by  M. of A. HUNTER, REYES, SIMON, EPSTEIN, CLARK, MITAYNES,
          GONZALEZ-ROJAS, ZINERMAN, MAMDANI,  BURGOS,  RAMOS,  FORREST,  KELLES,
          SEAWRIGHT,  JACKSON, BICHOTTE HERMELYN, JEAN-PIERRE, DAVILA, DINOWITZ,
          ANDERSON, L. ROSENTHAL, MEEKS, GALLAGHER, KIM, WALKER,  CRUZ,  HEVESI,
          STECK, CARROLL, GLICK, GIBBS, TAYLOR, RIVERA, TAPIA, CUNNINGHAM, COOK,
          LUCAS,  SHRESTHA, HYNDMAN, ARDILA, RAGA, SIMONE, DE LOS SANTOS, AUBRY,
          BORES -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of  A.  PRETLOW  --  read  once  and
          referred  to  the Committee on Judiciary -- committee discharged, bill
          amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said  commit-
          tee
 
        AN  ACT  to amend the civil rights law, in relation to providing a civil
          action for deprivation of rights
 
          The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and  Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section  1.  The  civil  rights law is amended by adding a new section
     2  79-r to read as follows:
     3    § 79-r. Civil action for deprivation of rights.   1. (a) A  person  or
     4  public  entity  acting  under color of law that subjects or causes to be
     5  subjected any other person to the deprivation of any rights, privileges,
     6  or immunities secured by the federal or state Constitution or  laws,  is
     7  liable  to  the injured party for legal or equitable relief or any other
     8  appropriate relief.  For the purposes of this section, a  public  entity
     9  subjects,  or  causes  to be subjected, any person to the deprivation of
    10  any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the  federal  or  state
    11  Constitution or laws, by employing any person who violates this section.
    12    (b)  Notwithstanding  any  other  law  to  the contrary, in any action
    13  brought pursuant to this section or the New York  human  rights  law,  a
    14  court  shall  award  reasonable  attorney fees and costs to a prevailing
    15  plaintiff. For the purposes  of  this  section,  the  term  "prevailing"
    16  includes  a  plaintiff  whose  commencement of litigation has acted as a
    17  catalyst to effect change in  the  defendant's  conduct,  regardless  of
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD01354-03-3

        A. 710--A                           2
 
     1  whether  that  change  has been implemented as a result of a judgment in
     2  such plaintiff's favor. When a judgment is entered in favor of a defend-
     3  ant, the court may award reasonable  costs  and  attorney  fees  to  the
     4  defendant only for defending any claims the court finds frivolous.
     5    2.  (a)  If  a  person or public entity acting under color of law that
     6  subjects or causes to be subjected any other person to  the  deprivation
     7  of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the federal or state
     8  Constitution  or laws, the attorney general may bring a civil action for
     9  legal or equitable relief or other  proper  redress.  The  civil  action
    10  shall  be  brought in the name of the state and may be brought on behalf
    11  of the injured party. A civil action brought  by  the  attorney  general
    12  shall  not  foreclose  an  injured  party  from bringing their own civil
    13  action for legal or equitable relief or other proper  redress.  A  civil
    14  action  brought  by  an  injured  party shall not foreclose the attorney
    15  general from bringing a civil action for legal or  equitable  relief  or
    16  other proper redress.
    17    (b)  If the attorney general prevails in an action brought pursuant to
    18  this section, the court shall order the distribution  of  any  award  of
    19  damages to the injured party.
    20    3.  (a)  Statutory  immunities and statutory limitations on liability,
    21  damages or attorney fees do not apply to claims brought pursuant to this
    22  section.
    23    (b) It shall not be a defense or immunity to any  action  brought  for
    24  the  deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the
    25  federal or state Constitution and laws, that such defendant  was  acting
    26  in  good faith, or that the defendant believed, reasonably or otherwise,
    27  that their conduct was lawful at the time such  conduct  was  committed.
    28  Nor  shall  it  be a defense or immunity that the rights, privileges, or
    29  immunities secured by the federal or state Constitution or laws were not
    30  clearly established at the time of their deprivation by  the  defendant,
    31  or that the state of the law was otherwise such that the defendant could
    32  not  reasonably  have  been  expected  to know whether their conduct was
    33  lawful.
    34    4. A civil action pursuant to this section shall be  commenced  within
    35  three years after the cause of action accrues.
    36    5.  Notwithstanding  any other provision of law, a public entity shall
    37  indemnify its public employee for any liability incurred by the employee
    38  and for any judgment entered against the  employee  for  claims  arising
    39  under this section.
    40    6.  For  the  purpose  of this section, "public entity" shall mean the
    41  state, any county, city and county, municipality, and every other  poli-
    42  tical  subdivision  of the state; and any private entity that engages in
    43  state action.
    44    7. The immunity granted pursuant to subdivision one of  section  twen-
    45  ty-four of the correction law shall not extend to actions brought pursu-
    46  ant to this section.
    47    8.  Notwithstanding  any  other  provision  of  law, including but not
    48  limited to subdivision two of section twenty-four of the correction law,
    49  actions brought pursuant to this section may be commenced in  any  court
    50  of competent jurisdiction, including the supreme court.
    51    § 2. Severability clause. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivi-
    52  sion,  section  or  part  of  this act shall be adjudged by any court of
    53  competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment  shall  not  affect,
    54  impair,  or  invalidate  the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in
    55  its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph,  subdivision,  section
    56  or part thereof directly involved in the controversy in which such judg-

        A. 710--A                           3
 
     1  ment shall have been rendered. It is hereby declared to be the intent of
     2  the  legislature  that  this  act  would  have been enacted even if such
     3  invalid provisions had not been included herein.
     4    § 3. This act shall take effect immediately.
Go to top