•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A08245 Summary:

BILL NOA08245
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORLasher
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §227-f, RP L
 
Provides penalties when a landlord of a residential premises refuses to rent to a potential tenant on the basis that the potential tenant was involved in a past or pending landlord-tenant action or summary proceeding.
Go to top    

A08245 Actions:

BILL NOA08245
 
05/05/2025referred to housing
01/07/2026referred to housing
Go to top

A08245 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A8245
 
SPONSOR: Lasher
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the real property law, in relation to remedies for a violation of the prohibition on a landlord from refusing to rent due to a tenant's involvement in a prior dispute   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: Allows tenants to sue if they are denied a lease based on their involve- ment in a prior landlord-tenant action or eviction proceeding   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section 1 adds a new subdivision to section 227-f of the real property law to authorize tenants that are denied a lease on the basis of involvement in a prior landlord-tenant action or eviction proceeding to sue for damages and injunctive relief. Section 2 establishes the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: In 2019, the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act (HSTPA) made it illegal for a property owner or landlord in New York State to deny a rental application based on the applicant's past involvement in a Hous- ing Court case. The Attorney General was charged with enforcing the provision, and violators now face a penalty of up to $1000. While this marks a significant policy improvement, the law's low penalty and its reliance on the Attorney General fail to properly deter rulebreakers, while denying tenants efficient recourse. The so-called "tenant blacklist" is profoundly consequential for tenants all over the United States. Through tenant-screening bureaus, landlords can gain access to a tenant's Housing Court records. Usually, this is one of the most consequential factors for landlords when determining whether to rent to a prospective tenant (HousingLink, 2024). A past eviction case can be what some have called a "scarlet E" for tenants (The Urban institute, 2023), creating an insurmountable obstacle to stable shelter. While eviction records can significantly constrict a tenant's access to the housing market, they are frequently inaccurate or incomplete. One cross-jurisdictional study estimated that 22% of eviction records contain ambiguous or false information (Porton, Gromis, & Desmond, 2020). For instance, if a tenant receives a 90% rent abatement after withholding rent, their court record could reflect a money judgement to the landlord for the remaining 10%. Other research shows that the use of housing court records by tenant screening bureaus and consumer reporting agencies facilitates discrimination (Shriver Center on Poverty and Law, 2020) and hinders efforts to address poverty and homelessness (Center for American Progress, 2021). While New York has technically banned use of the tenant blacklist, tenants' can only seek recourse through a complaint to the New York Attorney General-they cannot bring their own suit, nor can they seek damages. If landlords break the law, they face a maximum penalty of $1000-less than one-fourth of the median monthly rent in Manhattan. By creating a cause of action for tenants who suffer housing discrimination as a result of their involvement in a prior landlord-tenant proceeding, New York can bolster its enforcement capacity, deter wrongdoers, and conserve public resources.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: N/A   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.   EFFECTIVE DATE:,: This act shall take effect immediately.
Go to top

A08245 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          8245
 
                               2025-2026 Regular Sessions
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                       May 5, 2025
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced by M. of A. LASHER -- read once and referred to the Committee
          on Housing
 
        AN  ACT  to  amend  the real property law, in relation to remedies for a
          violation of the prohibition on a landlord from refusing to  rent  due
          to a tenant's involvement in a prior dispute

          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section 1. Section 227-f of the real property law is amended by adding
     2  a new subdivision 3 to read as follows:
     3    3. (a) Any potential tenant injured by reason of a violation of subdi-
     4  vision one of this section may bring an action in the supreme court  for
     5  temporary  and permanent injunctive relief and for damages together with
     6  the costs of the action, including reasonable attorney's fees.
     7    (b) An action under this subdivision may be brought within  two  years
     8  of  when  a tenant should reasonably have discovered a violation and may
     9  be brought against the landlord or their agent or employee or any  other
    10  person charged or authorized to lease the relevant residential premise.
    11    (c)  A person may commence an action under this subdivision whether or
    12  not they have reported the violation to the attorney general.
    13    (d) The commencement of an action under  this  subdivision  shall  not
    14  preclude  the attorney general from bringing an action under subdivision
    15  two of this section for injunctive relief  and  the  recovery  of  civil
    16  penalties.
    17    § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
 
 
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD11871-01-5
Go to top