•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A04965 Summary:

BILL NOA04965
 
SAME ASSAME AS S00226
 
SPONSORRosenthal L
 
COSPNSRMamdani, Epstein, Cruz, Raga, Forrest
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Add 838-c, Exec L
 
Prohibits the use of DNA phenotyping in criminal prosecutions and proceedings.
Go to top    

A04965 Actions:

BILL NOA04965
 
02/27/2023referred to governmental operations
01/03/2024referred to governmental operations
Go to top

A04965 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A4965
 
SPONSOR: Rosenthal L
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the executive law, in relation to prohibiting the use of DNA phenotyping in criminal prosecutions and proceedings   PURPOSE: This bill prohibits contracting for and use of DNA phenotyping products by law enforcement.   SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section one amends the executive law by adding section 838-c by first establishing definitions of the terms "DNA phenotyping" and "physical biometric information." This section also prohibits law enforcement agencies and members from contracting for DNA phenotyping services and does not allow product or evidence resulting from DNA phenotyping as reasonable cause for arrests, for use in an investigation, and for admitting to the record in court. This section then provides an avenue for relief for those who have been convicted as a result of DNA pheno- typing. Section two sets the effective date, and orders law enforcement and peace officers to destroy any physical biometric information they possess as a result of DNA phenotyping.   JUSTIFICATION: DNA phenotyping is the process by which someone's DNA is analyzed to predict their physical characteristics, including, their eye color, hair color, skin color, freckling, face shape, and ancestry. Recently, police agencies across the country have contracted with laboratories which conduct DNA phenotyping to develop "virtual mugshots" based on DNA obtained by law enforcement to search for potential criminal suspects. The use of this technology is problematic for many reasons. First, phenotyping cannot accurately predict physical appearance. Aside from scientific uncertainty, the technology is unable to take into account environmental factors that determine how someone looks; for example, disease, physical activity, injury, sun exposure, body modification, and other factors can alter someone's appearance in ways that cannot be predicted from a person's genetic code. Because of this, virtual mugshots risk being used to establish probable cause to arrest a person for a crime they did not commit. Additionally, mistaken identifications tend to disproportionately impact BIPOC and marginalized communities due to the effect of social preju- dices in the identification process. Throughout scholarship on cross- race racial identifications, it is well known that cross-race identifi- cations are notoriously inaccurate and have led to numerous wrongful convictions. Ultithately, this technology undermines fairness and public confidence in our criminal justice system. Detractors may argue that although the full picture produced with pheno- typing technology may not be wholly accurate, certain highly heritable traits, like eye color, can serve as a reliable basis to construct a mugshot. However, this is misleading because witness identification scholarship suggests that people process faces holistically as opposed to on a trait by trait basis. However, even in the context of a full facial image, the risk for misidentification is still very high. Accord- ing to the Innocence Project, "  mistaken eyewitness identifications contributed to approximately 69% of the more than 375 wrongful convictions in the United States overturned by post-conviction DNA evidence." Overall, DNA phenotyping is part of a broader movement to harness technology to curtail our civil liberties in the name of public safety and security. New Yorkers deserve a criminal justice system that respects civil liberties in the pursuit of public safety and security.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: New bill.   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None to the state.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall have become a law and any physical biometric information obtained as a result of DNA phenotyping already in possession of law enforcement and peace officers shall be immediately destroyed.
Go to top

A04965 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          4965
 
                               2023-2024 Regular Sessions
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                    February 27, 2023
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by  M.  of  A. L. ROSENTHAL -- read once and referred to the
          Committee on Governmental Operations
 
        AN ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to prohibiting the use of
          DNA phenotyping in criminal prosecutions and proceedings
 
          The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and  Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section  1. The executive law is amended by adding a new section 838-c
     2  to read as follows:
     3    § 838-c. DNA phenotyping. 1. As used in this  section,  the  following
     4  terms shall have the following meanings:
     5    (a)  "DNA phenotyping" shall mean the process of predicting a person's
     6  physical biometric information and other observable physical or biochem-
     7  ical characteristics, ancestry or familial connections based on an anal-
     8  ysis of such person's DNA; and
     9    (b) "physical biometric information" shall mean an individual's  phys-
    10  ical  characteristics,  including,  but  not limited to, eye color, hair
    11  color, skin color, freckling and face shape.
    12    2. No law enforcement  agency  or  member  of  law  enforcement  shall
    13  contract for DNA phenotyping services with any public or private entity.
    14    3.  No  product  or evidence that results or flows from the use of DNA
    15  phenotyping may be used as part of reasonable cause for arrest, and  any
    16  product  or evidence that results or flows from the use of DNA phenotyp-
    17  ing is prohibited from use in  an  investigation.  For  criminal  prose-
    18  cutions  and  proceedings, any evidence or product that results or flows
    19  from the use of DNA phenotyping is inadmissible.
    20    4. Any conviction obtained, either directly or indirectly, through the
    21  use of DNA phenotyping, shall be eligible for relief in accordance  with
    22  section 440.10 of the criminal procedure law.
    23    5.  In  any  action brought by any person to enforce this section, the
    24  court may issue an injunction  to  restrain,  prevent,  or  enforce  any
    25  violation of this section, including but not limited to, the destruction
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD01859-01-3

        A. 4965                             2
 
     1  of  any product of DNA phenotyping. The court may mandate changes in the
     2  policies and procedures of police department rules and  guidelines  when
     3  such measures are required to remedy a violation under this section.
     4    §  2.  This  act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall
     5  have become a law and any physical biometric information obtained  as  a
     6  result  of  DNA phenotyping already in possession of law enforcement and
     7  peace officers shall be immediately destroyed.
Go to top