•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A02210 Summary:

BILL NOA02210
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORRosenthal
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §§705.10, 700.15 & 690.40, add §690.60, CP L
 
Prohibits issuance of certain search warrants relating to out-of-state investigations of abortion services provided in NYS; prohibits corporations domiciled in NYS from complying with certain out-of-state search warrants regarding abortion services provided in NYS.
Go to top    

A02210 Actions:

BILL NOA02210
 
01/15/2025referred to codes
01/07/2026referred to codes
Go to top

A02210 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          2210
 
                               2025-2026 Regular Sessions
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                    January 15, 2025
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by  M.  of  A.  ROSENTHAL  --  read once and referred to the
          Committee on Codes
 
        AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to  out-of-state
          investigations  and warrants regarding legally protected health activ-
          ity in New York state
 
          The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and  Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section  1.  Section 705.10 of the criminal procedure law, as added by
     2  chapter 744 of the laws of 1988, is amended to read as follows:
     3  § 705.10 Orders authorizing the use of a pen  register  or  a  trap  and
     4               trace device; when issuable.
     5    1.  An order authorizing the use of a pen register or a trap and trace
     6  device may issue only:
     7    [1.] (a) Upon an appropriate application made in conformity with  this
     8  article; and
     9    [2.] (b) Upon a determination that an application sets forth specific,
    10  articulable  facts, warranting the applicant's reasonable suspicion that
    11  a designated crime has been, is being, or is about to be  committed  and
    12  demonstrating that the information likely to be obtained by use of a pen
    13  register  or  trap and trace device is or will be relevant to an ongoing
    14  criminal investigation of such designated crime.
    15    2. Notwithstanding any other provision in this article, no court shall
    16  enter an ex parte order authorizing the installation and use  of  a  pen
    17  register  or a trap and trace device for the purpose of investigating or
    18  recovering evidence of a legally protected health activity,  as  defined
    19  in section 570.17 of this article.
    20    § 2. Section 700.15 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chap-
    21  ter 744 of the laws of 1988, is amended to read as follows:
    22  § 700.15  Eavesdropping and video surveillance warrants; when issuable.
    23    1. An eavesdropping or video surveillance warrant may issue only:
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD05519-01-5

        A. 2210                             2
 
     1    [1.]  (a) Upon an appropriate application made in conformity with this
     2  article; and
     3    [2.]  (b) Upon probable cause to believe that a particularly described
     4  person  is committing, has committed, or is about to commit a particular
     5  designated offense; and
     6    [3.] (c) Upon probable cause to believe that particular communications
     7  concerning such offense will be obtained through eavesdropping, or  upon
     8  probable  cause  to believe that particular observations concerning such
     9  offense will be obtained through video surveillance; and
    10    [4.] (d) Upon a showing that normal investigative procedures have been
    11  tried and have failed, or reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if
    12  tried, or to be too dangerous to employ; and
    13    [5.] (e) Upon probable cause  to  believe  that  the  facilities  from
    14  which,  or  the place where, the communications are to be intercepted or
    15  the video surveillance is to be conducted, are being used, or are  about
    16  to  be  used,  in connection with the commission of such offense, or are
    17  leased to, listed in the name of, or commonly used by such person.
    18    2. Notwithstanding any other provision in this article, no court shall
    19  enter an ex parte order authorizing interception of a telephonic  commu-
    20  nication  or  electronic communications for the purpose of investigating
    21  or recovering evidence  of  a  legally  protected  health  activity,  as
    22  defined in section 570.17 of this article.
    23    § 3. Section 690.40 of the criminal procedure law is amended by adding
    24  a new subdivision 4 to read as follows:
    25    4. No warrant shall be issued under this article for any item or items
    26  that  pertain to an investigation into a legally protected health activ-
    27  ity, as defined in section 570.17 of this article.
    28    § 4. The criminal procedure law is amended by  adding  a  new  section
    29  690.60 to read as follows:
    30  § 690.60 Search warrants; certain requirements for corporations.
    31    1.  A  corporation  domiciled  in  New  York state, when served with a
    32  warrant issued by another state to produce  records  shall  not  produce
    33  such  records  when  such  corporation  knows  or  should know that such
    34  warrant relates to an investigation into, or enforcement of,  a  legally
    35  protected health activity, as defined in section 570.17 of this article.
    36    2.  (a)  No  warrant  issued  upon a corporation domiciled in New York
    37  state shall be enforceable unless such warrant includes, or is  accompa-
    38  nied  by,  an  attestation that the evidence sought is not related to an
    39  investigation into, or enforcement of, a legally protected health activ-
    40  ity, as defined in section 570.17 of this article.
    41    (b) A corporation domiciled in New York state that is  served  with  a
    42  warrant  shall  be  entitled  to  rely on the representations made in an
    43  attestation described in paragraph (a) of this subdivision in  determin-
    44  ing  whether  such warrant relates to an investigation into, or enforce-
    45  ment of, a legally protected health  activity,  as  defined  in  section
    46  570.17 of this article.
    47    § 5. This act shall take effect immediately.
Go to top