-  This bill is not active in this session.
 
     
  •  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 

A02177 Summary:

BILL NOA02177A
 
SAME ASSAME AS S00397-A
 
SPONSOREspinal
 
COSPNSRRoberts
 
MLTSPNSRRivera
 
Amd S1128, V & T L
 
Relates to the presence of official full or partial lane markings on roadways.
Go to top

A02177 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A2177A
 
SPONSOR: Espinal
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the vehicle and traffic law, in relation to roadway lane markings   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL:! To amend the vehicle and traffic law by clarifying which lane markings prohibit the changing of travel lanes in the same direction.   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section 1 of the bill amends subdivision d of section 1128 of chapter 206 of vehicle and traffic law by adding the language ."For purposes of this subdivision, "official markings" shall mean lane line markings consisting of a solid double white line used to indicate where specific lane changing is legally prohibited for a particular section of roadway by official order, ordinance, rule or regulation, in conformance with the New York State manual and specifications for a uniform system of traffic control devices adopted by the commissioner of transportation pursuant to section sixteen hundred eighty of this chapter." Section 2 provides that this act shall take effect immediately.   JUSTIFICATION: As the current vehicle and traffic law 1128 (d) is written, official highway markings are those that shall not at any time be crossed by a driver. The law's original intent was as a "no lane change" provision to the vehicle and traffic law. However, the current law is vague and allows police officers to issue a ticket in violation of section 1128 (d) to anyone whom the officer deems has, in a hazardous manner, crossed a marking such as the edge line, which could include your own driveway entrance. The Appellate Term, of the Second Department found in the People v Shulman that the white edgeline along the side of the road does not constitute an "official marking" under VAT 1128 (d). This court ruled in favor of Mr. Shulman, finding that the original intent of section 11 28 (d) was in specific reference to crossing barri- er markings. The white edge line along the road, for instance, does not represent a barrier marking and thus is not an official roadway marking under section 1128(d). The presence barrier markings already indicates those portions of the roadway where the NYDOT has determined that crossing such markings would be especially hazardous and thus that changing lanes is prohibited. In this bill, the use of the phrase "where specific lane changing is legally prohibited," brings NYS VAT1128 (d) closer to the corresponding terminology in the Uniform Vehicle Code and clarifies the law.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2009-10: Similar legislation S.5175E/A.9823 - Passed Senate   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately.
Go to top