•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 

A04028 Summary:

BILL NOA04028
 
SAME ASNo same as
 
SPONSORLentol (MS)
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSRBenedetto, Clark, Cook, Dinowitz, Englebright, Galef, Lavine, Lifton, Magnarelli, Pretlow, Ramos, Scarborough, Sweeney, Titus, Zebrowski
 
Amd SS995-b, 995-a, 995-c, 995-d & 995-f, Exec L; amd SS1.20, 190.65, 340.20 & 440.30, CP L; add S97-llll, St Fin L
 
Provides for DNA testing, collection and record keeping; indictments by fictitious name in DNA cases; and creating the innocence research project program.
Go to top

A04028 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A4028
 
SPONSOR: Lentol (MS)
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the executive law, the criminal proce- dure law and the state finance law, in relation to DNA testing, data collection and record keeping, and to special indictments by fictitious name in DNA cases; and in relation to creating the innocence research project program   PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: The bill requires the state to submit a plan to the legislature to include all penal law misdemeanors on the state DNA database, prohibits DNA identification databases not authorized by statute, and enacts a number of critical DNA-related reforms.   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section 1 of the bill amends Executive Law section 995-b to require the State Commission on Forensic Science to submit a plan to the Governor and the legislature to include all persons convicted of a penal law misdemeanor in the state DNA identification index of convicted persons. The plan is to be submitted to the governor and legislature by December 1, 2011. The plan would have to specify how the state would deal with the backlog of DNA samples which would be created by adding approximately 100,000 new DNA samples to the database (the estimated number of new samples which would be required to be processed in an "all crimes" database), how the state would process such samples and what safeguards would be put in place to ensure that such samples would be processed accurately. Section 2 of the bill amends section 995-a of the executive law by increasing the membership of the commission on forensic science from 14 to 16 members. Section 3 of the bill requires that two members appointed to the commis- sion be appointed jointly by the temporary president of the senate and the speaker of the assembly, one of whom shall have experience as a crime victim advocate and the other shall be an expert in biomedical ethics. Section 4 of the bill amends section 995-b of the executive law to require the commission on forensic science to develop a policy to deter- mine the appropriate period of time that a DNA sample collected from a crime scene should be retained by investigating authorities. Section 5 of the bill amends section 995-b of the executive law to require the commission on forensic science to review the confidentiality safeguards with respect to DNA samples and to issue a report to the legislature in this regard. Section 6 of the bill amends section 995-c of the executive law to prohibit DNA identification indexes other than the state DNA identifica- tion index authorized by law and maintained by the division of criminal justice services. Section 7 of the bill amends section 995-c of the executive law to require that upon the destruction of a DNA sample, the person who submitted the sample, or such person's attorney, shall receive a copy of the record of destruction. Further, the bill provides that DNA samples provided voluntarily to law enforcement shall be destroyed, sealed or returned to the person who provided the sample either at the conclusion of the investigation or five years after such sample was obtained, whichever occurs earlier. Law enforcement agencies in possession of such samples would make the determination as to whether such samples would be returned, destroyed or sealed. Section 8 of the bill amends section 995-c of the executive law to require the court to make information regarding the comparison of data- banked DNA samples and crime scene samples available to a defendant on motion if such information may be material to such defendant's defense. Section 9 of the bill amends section 995-d of the executive law allows a DNA sample collected by law enforcement as part of an investigation to compare such sample against DNA profiles collected from one or more crime scenes under investigation. If such sample does not match any DNA crime scene profiles, such sample shall be dealt with in accordance with section 995-c of this article. This section also requires that law enforcement officials obtain written consent from a person before collecting a voluntary sample from the person for investigative purposes. Section 10 of the bill amends section 995-f of the executive law to increase the penalty for tampering or misusing a DNA sample from a class E felony to a class D felony. Section 11 of the bill amends section 1.20 of the criminal procedure law to allow for special fictitious name indictments. Section 12 of the bill makes a conforming amendment to section 190.65 of the criminal procedure law. Section 13 of the bill amends section 340.20 of the criminal procedure law to require the court to notify a person pleading guilty to a penal law misdemeanor that such person will be required to submit a DNA sample for inclusion in the state DNA identification index if such misdemeanor is included in the definition of designated offender pursuant to section 995 of the executive law. Section 14 of the bill amends section 440.30 of the criminal procedure law to require the court to provide a person seeking to vacate a judg- ment of conviction with access to evidence that may yield relevant DNA information. Section 15 of the bill amends the state finance law to add a new section that establishes the DNA evidence fund to assist police and crime labo- ratories in collecting, testing and analyzing DNA crime scene evidence. Section 16 of the bill establishes the innocence research project program.   JUSTIFICATION: Expansion of the DNA databank must take place in an effective way which ensures accuracy. Other related reforms in the DNA system must also take place to ensure that we make the most effective use of DNA and provide for appropriate privacy safeguards for persons who have never been convicted of a crime. A related bill proposes to immediately add all felonies and a number of specified misdemeanors to the DNA databank. Currently, New York State does not have the capacity to process all of the DNA samples required to be immediately added to the database if all penal law felonies and misdemeanors were included. Including all penal law felonies and misde- meanors in the database at this time would cause approximately 100,000 new DNA samples to flood the database immediately, with an additional 80,000 samples added to the database in the first year. The state is currently processing 15,000 to 18,000 samples per year and has the capacity to process approximately 30,000 samples per year. The addition of all felonies alone would likely result in approximately 25,000 new samples being entered into the database immediately, leading to an additional 20,000 samples needing to be included in the database annually. Adding in samples from certain misdemeanor crimes would increase that number still further. Therefore, the bill which adds all felonies and specified misdemeanors would push the current system to its limits. At the same time, this bill provides for the state to submit a plan to the legislature designed to facilitate the inclusion of all penal law misdemeanors into the DNA database. Specifically, this bill requires that a plan be submitted to the legis- lature by December 1st to include all penal misdemeanors to the comput- erized state DNA identification index. The bill requires that a plan be provided to the legislature which will outline in detail how those samples of persons convicted of any penal law misdemeanor would be added to the database in a way which would not compromise the processing of samples from crime scenes and from convicted violent felons. The bill would also enact a number of important related reforms. It would prohibit DNA samples from persons who had never been convicted of any crime from being kept in ad-hoc, databases which operate in some jurisdictions without statutory authorization. It would direct the Commission on Forensic Science to promulgate best practices guidelines for the preservation and use of forensic evidence. It would establish funding programs for crime labs and "Innocence Research projects" to enhance the use of DNA. When fully implemented, this bill along with the bill that would add all felonies and a number of specified misdemeanors to the database, would give New York not only the most extensive database in the nation, but would enact the nation's most effective system for using forensic DNA evidence, as well as provide the privacy safeguards that are necessary to encourage volunteer samples and prevent misuse of this powerful tool.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: A.11952 of 2006 A3687 of 2007-2008 A.5179 of 2009-2010 A.1315 of 2011-12   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Not yet determined.   EFFECTIVE DATE: The bill takes effect immediately provided however that (a) the amendments made to paragraph (a) of Subdivision 2 of section 995-c of the executive law shall take effect on the one hundred twentieth day after it shall become law; and (b) the amendments to section 340.20 of the criminal procedure law made by section thirteen of this act shall apply to pleas of guilty to a count or counts of an information entered 60 days or more after the effective date of this act.
Go to top