•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A06514 Summary:

BILL NOA06514A
 
SAME ASSAME AS S05246-A
 
SPONSORNolan
 
COSPNSRBrindisi, Seawright, Thiele, Paulin, Abinanti, Mayer, Pellegrino, Lupardo, Buchwald, Colton, Sepulveda
 
MLTSPNSRGalef, Ra
 
Amd §§4004 & 4405, Ed L
 
Relates to establishing a fiscal stabilization reserve fund as part of the tuition reimbursement methodology for school age programs and to providing an annual growth amount for the tuition reimbursement for school age programs operated by in-state approved private schools for the education of students with disabilities and special act school districts.
Go to top

A06514 Memo:

NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A6514A
 
SPONSOR: Nolan
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the education law, in relation to establishing a fiscal stabilization reserve fund as part of the tuition reimbursement methodology for school age programs and providing an annu- al growth amount for the tuition reimbursement for school age programs operated by in-state approved private schools for the education of students with disabilities and special act school districts   PURPOSE OF THE BILL: To establish a fiscal stabilization reserve fund as part of the tuition reimbursement methodology for school age programs and to provide an annual growth amount, correlating with New York State personal income growth, in the tuition reimbursement rate for school age programs oper- ated by in-state approved private schools for the education of students with disabilities and special act school districts.   SUMMARY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE BILL: Section one amends paragraph c of subdivision 4 of section 4405 of the education law to provide that for the 2017-18 school year and thereaft- er, annual tuition rates for special act school districts and in-state approved private residential or non-residential schools educating students with disabilities that are located within the state shall increase by the greater of: (i) a three-year average of State-wide total personal income; (ii) a percentage recommended by the Commissioner and approved by the Director of Budget; (iii) or zero. Section two amends section 4004 of the education law by adding a new subdivision 5 to provide that special act school districts may establish a fiscal stabilization reserve fund. Section three amends subdivision 4 of section 4405 to provide that the approved tuition methodology for the 2017-18 school year and thereafter shall authorize school age programs operated by in-state approved private schools for the education of students with disabilities and special act school districts to retain funds up to one percent of their annual allowable and reimbursable costs not to exceed a total of four percent of such costs. Section four is the effective date.   STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE BILL: Tuition reimbursement for Special Act School Districts and Approved Private Schools Serving Students with Disabilities (853 Schools) is based on a rate methodology that is established by the Department and approved by the Division of Budget (DOB). Following four years of zero growth in tuition reimbursement, the 2013-14 rate methodology included a three percent trend factor for direct care costs of school age provid- ers. The 2014-15 rate methodology included a three and eight tenths percent trend factor, which equaled the three year average of state-wide total personal income growth, and the 2015-16 and 2016-17 rate methodol- ogy included a four percent trend factor. The increases of recent years have provided relief, but have not addressed many of the shortcomings of the current system. At the November 2012 meeting of the Board of Regents, the Board directed the Department to create a Special Education Financial Advisory Work- group to allow all interested stakeholders to provide input on the current tuition rate-setting structure for special education providers and discuss recommendations to maximize the efficient and effective use of state and local resources. This workgroup held two meetings in May of 2013. Based on provider testimony at the Special Education Financial Advisory Workgroup meetings, and SED analysis of submitted cost data, a lack of predictable growth to fund increasing costs and many technical aspects of the current rate setting methodology, have endangered the capacity of Special Act School Districts and 853 Schools to operate essential special education programs for some of the most severely disa- bled school age children. To assist in the financial recovery of Special Act School Districts and 853 Schools, the Work Group representatives strongly endorsed the need for statutory changes - with particular emphasis on the establishment of an annual tuition rate growth factor as well as the creation of a fiscal stabilization reserve fund. This legislation would create a statutory index for consideration in determining the growth in annual tuition rates with a protection that rate growth would be held harmless to zero. As the current growth in tuition rate is established administratively, and is not based on a predetermined index, there is potential for an administrative request to exceed a statutorily-based growth factor. Therefore, the legislation includes three options for establishing growth in tuition, of which the greater number would be utilized: a hold harmless, an amount equal to the three-year average of personal income growth of taxpayers in the state, or an amount recommended by the Commissioner and approved by the Division of the Budget. A statutory growth index based on an average of state personal income growth would set a benchmark for predictable and timely tuition increases and allow for improved budget planning. Special Act School Districts and 853 Schools have historically relied on lines of credit to pay for unplanned or emergency expenditures until tuition revenue is received. Authorizing these schools to accumulate a small percentage of tuition revenue in a general reserve fund would reduce the reliance on private borrowing and enable schools to better respond to unanticipated events. Administrative parameters would be developed by the Department to specify the amount that may be deposited and to identify the allowable uses for the funds in addition to corre- sponding reporting requirements to ensure appropriate oversight.   BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS OF THE BILL: There is no cost to the state during the 2017-18 school year. Using past data, it is projected that funding one percent of total annual allowable and reimbursable costs of the 853 Schools and Special Act School Districts would equal approximately $7.6 million in additional reimbursement to the schools. It is also projected that a trend increase for tuition based on a three-year average in total personal income growth (3.4%) would provide approximately an additional $26 million in billable tuition for these schools in the 2017-18 school year. For the 2017-18 school year, the Division of the Budget approved 4% in tuition growth, greater than the three-year average total personal income growth, which will provide approximately $31 million in additional fund- ing. This amount would be paid by the placing school district or social services district as part of the annual tuition amount and for the plac- ing school district and these costs would be eligible for private excess cost aid and July and August aid under Education Law § 4408.   PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: This is a new bill. However, bills containing similar provisions were previously introduced in 2014, 2015, and 2016. Specifically, in 2014, the similar bill was introduced by the Senate as S.7638, was referred to the Education Committee and no further action was taken. It was also introduced by the Assembly as A.9767 and was reported from the Education Committee and referred to the Ways and Means Committee and no further action was taken. In 2015 and 2016, the similar bill was introduced in the Senate and Assembly (S. 7916 Flanagan/A.5061-A Nolan) and remained in the Education Committees of both houses.   EFFECTIVE DATE: The bill would take effect immediately.
Go to top