•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A08699 Summary:

BILL NOA08699
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORBichotte Hermelyn
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §296, Exec L
 
Clarifies the standard for when a practice has a discriminatory effect; provides that an unlawful discriminatory practice may be established by such practice's discriminatory effect, even if such practice was not motivated by a discriminatory intent.
Go to top

A08699 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          8699
 
                               2025-2026 Regular Sessions
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                      May 30, 2025
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by  M.  of A. BICHOTTE HERMELYN -- read once and referred to
          the Committee on Governmental Operations
 
        AN ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to clarifying the  stand-
          ard for when a practice has a discriminatory effect
 
          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section 1. Section 296 of the executive law is amended by adding a new
     2  subdivision 5-a to read as follows:
     3    5-a. (a) For any case alleging employment  discrimination  under  this
     4  article,  an  unlawful  discriminatory  practice may be established by a
     5  practice's discriminatory effect, even if such practice  was  not  moti-
     6  vated  by  a  discriminatory intent. The practice may still be lawful if
     7  supported by a legally sufficient justification, as defined in paragraph
     8  (c) of this subdivision.
     9    (b) For the purposes of this subdivision, a practice has a discrimina-
    10  tory effect where it actually or  predictably  results  in  a  disparate
    11  impact  on  a  group of persons, because of race, creed, color, national
    12  origin, citizenship or immigration status,  sexual  orientation,  gender
    13  identity  or  expression, military status, sex, age, disability, marital
    14  status, status as a victim of domestic violence, lawful source of income
    15  or familial.
    16    (c) (i) A legally sufficient justification exists where the challenged
    17  practice:
    18    (A) is necessary to  achieve  one  or  more  substantial,  legitimate,
    19  nondiscriminatory interests of the respondent; and
    20    (B) those interests could not be served by another practice that has a
    21  less discriminatory effect.
    22    (ii) A legally sufficient justification shall be supported by evidence
    23  and  may  not  be  hypothetical or speculative. The burdens of proof for
    24  establishing each of the two elements of a legally sufficient justifica-
    25  tion are set forth in paragraph (d) of this subdivision.
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD13283-01-5

        A. 8699                             2
 
     1    (d) (i) The complainant shall have the burden of proving that a  chal-
     2  lenged  practice  caused  or  predictably  will  cause  a discriminatory
     3  effect.
     4    (ii)  Once  the complainant satisfies the burden of proof set forth in
     5  subparagraph one of this paragraph, the respondent shall have the burden
     6  of proving that the challenged practice is necessary to achieve  one  or
     7  more   substantial,   legitimate,  nondiscriminatory  interests  of  the
     8  respondent.
     9    (iii) If the respondent satisfies the burden of  proof  set  forth  in
    10  subparagraph  two  of  this paragraph, the complainant may still prevail
    11  upon proving that the substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory  inter-
    12  ests supporting the challenged practice could be served by another prac-
    13  tice that has a less discriminatory effect.
    14    (e)  A  demonstration that a practice is supported by a legally suffi-
    15  cient justification, as defined in paragraph (c)  of  this  subdivision,
    16  may  not  be  used as a defense against a claim of intentional discrimi-
    17  nation.
    18    (f) Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed or  interpreted  as
    19  limiting,  restricting, overriding, or supplanting any broader interpre-
    20  tation of the discriminatory practices described in this article or  the
    21  availability of liability under this article.
    22    §  2.  This  act  shall take effect immediately and shall apply to all
    23  cases alleging unlawful discriminatory practices constituting employment
    24  discrimination occurring on and after  such  effective  date.  Effective
    25  immediately,  the addition, amendment and/or repeal of any rule or regu-
    26  lation necessary for the implementation of this  act  on  its  effective
    27  date are authorized to be made and completed on or before such effective
    28  date.
Go to top