•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

A09552 Summary:

BILL NOA09552
 
SAME ASSAME AS S08625
 
SPONSORSimon
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §5501, CPLR
 
Requires the appellate division gives the highest degree of deference to the jury's fact finding, including its assessment of damages.
Go to top

A09552 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          9552
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                    January 14, 2026
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by M. of A. SIMON -- read once and referred to the Committee
          on Judiciary
 
        AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to setting
          the level of deference given by the appellate division to  the  jury's
          fact finding
 
          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:

     1    Section 1. Subdivision (c) of section 5501 of the civil  practice  law
     2  and  rules, as amended by chapter 474 of the laws of 1997, is amended to
     3  read as follows:
     4    (c) Appellate division. The appellate division shall review  questions
     5  of  law and questions of fact on an appeal from a judgment or order of a
     6  court of original instance and on an appeal from an order of the supreme
     7  court, a county court or an appellate term determining an appeal.    The
     8  notice  of appeal from an order directing summary judgment, or directing
     9  judgment on a motion addressed to the  pleadings,  shall  be  deemed  to
    10  specify  a  judgment upon said order entered after service of the notice
    11  of appeal and before entry of the order of the appellate court upon such
    12  appeal, without however affecting the taxation of costs upon the appeal.
    13  In reviewing a money judgment in an action in which an itemized  verdict
    14  is  required  by rule forty-one hundred eleven of this chapter [in which
    15  it is contended that the award is excessive or inadequate and that a new
    16  trial should have been granted unless a  stipulation  is  entered  to  a
    17  different award, the appellate division shall determine that an award is
    18  excessive  or  inadequate  if  it deviates materially from what would be
    19  reasonable compensation], where it is contended that the award is exces-
    20  sive or inadequate and that a new trial should have been granted  unless
    21  a  stipulation  is  entered to a different award, the appellate division
    22  shall give the highest degree of deference to the jury's  factual  find-
    23  ings,  including its assessment of damages. An award shall not be deemed
    24  excessive or inadequate unless the moving party  establishes,  by  clear
    25  and  convincing  evidence,  that the verdict is so extraordinary that it
    26  shocks the conscience of the court and could not have  been  reached  by
    27  any  reasonable  jury. In making this determination, the appellate divi-
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD14193-02-5

        A. 9552                             2
 
     1  sion shall consider the evidence in the  light  most  favorable  to  the
     2  prevailing  party  and shall not substitute its judgment for that of the
     3  jury on questions of credibility, weight of the evidence, or the quanti-
     4  fication of damages.
     5    §  2.  This act shall take effect immediately and apply to all actions
     6  filed on or after such effective date.
Go to top