•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

S04067 Summary:

BILL NOS04067A
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORKAVANAGH
 
COSPNSRMYRIE, CLEARE, BAILEY, BASKIN, BRISPORT, BROUK, COMRIE, COONEY, FAHY, FERNANDEZ, GIANARIS, GONZALEZ, GOUNARDES, HARCKHAM, HINCHEY, HOYLMAN-SIGAL, KRUEGER, LIU, MAY, MAYER, RAMOS, RIVERA, SALAZAR, SANDERS, SEPULVEDA, WEBB
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §296, Exec L
 
Codifies the disparate impact standard in the human rights law; provides that in cases of alleged housing discrimination, an unlawful discriminatory practice may be established by a practice's discriminatory effect, even if such practice was not motivated by a discriminatory intent.
Go to top

S04067 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                         4067--A
 
                               2025-2026 Regular Sessions
 
                    IN SENATE
 
                                    January 31, 2025
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by  Sens. KAVANAGH, MYRIE, CLEARE, BAILEY, BASKIN, BRISPORT,
          BROUK, COMRIE, COONEY, FAHY, FERNANDEZ, GIANARIS, GONZALEZ, GOUNARDES,
          HARCKHAM, HINCHEY, HOYLMAN-SIGAL, KRUEGER,  LIU,  MAY,  MAYER,  RAMOS,
          RIVERA,  SALAZAR,  SANDERS,  SEPULVEDA, WEBB -- read twice and ordered
          printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Investi-
          gations  and  Government  Operations  --  committee  discharged,  bill
          amended,  ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said commit-
          tee
 
        AN ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to codifying  the  dispa-
          rate impact standard in the human rights law
 
          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section 1. Section 296 of the executive law is amended by adding a new
     2  subdivision 5-a to read as follows:
     3    5-a. (a) For any case alleging housing discrimination under this arti-
     4  cle, an unlawful discriminatory practice may be established by  a  prac-
     5  tice's discriminatory effect, even if such practice was not motivated by
     6  a  discriminatory  intent. The practice may still be lawful if supported
     7  by a legally sufficient justification, as defined in  paragraph  (c)  of
     8  this subdivision.
     9    (b) For the purposes of this subdivision, a practice has a discrimina-
    10  tory  effect  where  it  actually  or predictably results in a disparate
    11  impact on a group of  persons  or  creates,  increases,  reinforces,  or
    12  perpetuates  segregated  housing patterns because of race, creed, color,
    13  national origin, citizenship or immigration status, sexual  orientation,
    14  gender  identity  or  expression, military status, sex, age, disability,
    15  marital status, status as a victim of domestic violence,  lawful  source
    16  of income or familial.
    17    (c) (1) A legally sufficient justification exists where the challenged
    18  practice:

         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD05110-05-5

        S. 4067--A                          2
 
     1    (i)  is  necessary  to  achieve  one  or more substantial, legitimate,
     2  nondiscriminatory interests of the respondent; and
     3    (ii)  those interests could not be served by another practice that has
     4  a less discriminatory effect.
     5    (2) A legally sufficient justification shall be supported by  evidence
     6  and  may  not  be  hypothetical or speculative. The burdens of proof for
     7  establishing each of the two elements of a legally sufficient justifica-
     8  tion are set forth in paragraph (d) of this subdivision.
     9    (d) (1) The complainant shall have the burden of proving that a  chal-
    10  lenged  practice  caused  or  predictably  will  cause  a discriminatory
    11  effect.
    12    (2) Once the complainant satisfies the burden of proof  set  forth  in
    13  subparagraph one of this paragraph, the respondent shall have the burden
    14  of  proving  that the challenged practice is necessary to achieve one or
    15  more  substantial,  legitimate,  nondiscriminatory  interests   of   the
    16  respondent.
    17    (3)  If  the  respondent  satisfies  the  burden of proof set forth in
    18  subparagraph two of this paragraph, the complainant  may  still  prevail
    19  upon  proving that the substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory inter-
    20  ests supporting the challenged practice could be served by another prac-
    21  tice that has a less discriminatory effect.
    22    (e) A demonstration that a practice is supported by a  legally  suffi-
    23  cient  justification,  as  defined in paragraph (c) of this subdivision,
    24  may not be used as a defense against a claim  of  intentional  discrimi-
    25  nation.
    26    (f)  Nothing  in this subdivision shall be construed or interpreted as
    27  limiting, restricting, overriding, or supplanting any broader  interpre-
    28  tation  of the discriminatory practices described in this article or the
    29  availability of liability under this article.
    30    § 2. This act shall take effect immediately and  shall  apply  to  all
    31  cases  alleging  unlawful  discriminatory practices constituting housing
    32  discrimination occurring on and after  such  effective  date.  Effective
    33  immediately,  the addition, amendment and/or repeal of any rule or regu-
    34  lation necessary for the implementation of this  act  on  its  effective
    35  date are authorized to be made on or before such effective date.
Go to top