•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

S07776 Summary:

BILL NOS07776A
 
SAME ASSAME AS A08336-A
 
SPONSORRAMOS
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Add §§215-d & 198-f, Lab L; add §296-e, Exec L
 
Enacts the "faithless servant reform act", creating a rebuttable presumption of retaliation or discrimination for certain actions of an employer; provides that the employer maintains the burden of proof in certain actions against an employee; limits an employer's remedy of forfeiture against an employee's compensation.
Go to top

S07776 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                         7776--A
 
                               2025-2026 Regular Sessions
 
                    IN SENATE
 
                                       May 6, 2025
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by  Sen.  RAMOS  -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
          printed to be committed to the Committee on Labor -- reported  favora-
          bly  from  said committee and committed to the Committee on Finance --
          committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as  amended  and
          recommitted to said committee

        AN  ACT  to  amend  the  labor law and the executive law, in relation to
          enacting the "faithless servant reform act"
 
          The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and  Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section  1.  Short  title. This act shall be known and may be cited as
     2  the "faithless servant reform act".
     3    § 2. Legislative intent. The purpose of this act is to  safeguard  all
     4  employees  from retaliatory legal actions by employers in the context of
     5  employment disputes and to ensure that all claims of employee disloyalty
     6  are substantiated, narrowly limited, and consistently and  appropriately
     7  applied.  The  second  purpose of this act is to ensure that even in the
     8  very limited class of cases where some forfeiture  of  employee  compen-
     9  sation  may  otherwise  be  permissible  under this act, such forfeiture
    10  shall be limited to  compensation  for  pay  periods  during  which  the
    11  disloyal acts occurred and shall not encompass any part of an employee's
    12  minimum wage or overtime compensation.
    13    § 3. The labor law is amended by adding a new section 215-d to read as
    14  follows:
    15    § 215-d. Prohibited  retaliation;  additional  provisions.  Rebuttable
    16  presumption of retaliation. In any action where an  employee  asserts  a
    17  claim  under  this  chapter, for unpaid wages, benefits, or wage supple-
    18  ments, and the employer responds by filing  or  threatening  to  file  a
    19  claim,  counterclaim,  or  affirmative defense seeking the forfeiture of
    20  any employment compensation, there shall  be  a  rebuttable  presumption
    21  that  such  employer's  action  is retaliatory under section two hundred
    22  fifteen of this article.
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD05454-04-5

        S. 7776--A                          2
 
     1    § 4. The labor law is amended by adding a new section 198-f to read as
     2  follows:
     3    § 198-f. Limitations on forfeiture of wages, benefits, or wage supple-
     4  ments.    1.  Burden  of  proof for employers. (a) The forfeiture of any
     5  unpaid wages, benefits, or wage supplements shall not  be  an  available
     6  remedy  to an employer against an employee arising from within the scope
     7  of the employment relationship, unless such employer proves by clear and
     8  convincing evidence that:
     9    (i) such employee's conduct was  so  pervasive  and  egregious  as  to
    10  negate the central purpose of the employment relationship;
    11    (ii)  such  forfeiture  is  based  on  more  than a single act of such
    12  employee; and
    13    (iii) such employer did not  know  of  and  tolerate  such  employee's
    14  conduct.
    15    (b)  Forfeiture  of  unpaid wages, benefits, or wage supplements under
    16  paragraph (a) of this subdivision shall be limited  to  instances  where
    17  the  employee  unfairly  competes  with  the  employer, diverts business
    18  opportunities away from such employer to such employee to the  financial
    19  detriment of such employer, or accepts improper kickbacks.
    20    2.  Limitation  on  the remedy of forfeiture. In the limited instances
    21  where it may be available, an employer's remedy of forfeiture against an
    22  employee shall be strictly limited to compensation due for the pay peri-
    23  ods during which such employee's affirmative acts under subdivision  one
    24  of this section occurred. Notwithstanding such potential availability of
    25  a partial forfeiture of an employee's compensation, such partial forfei-
    26  ture shall not include minimum wage and overtime payments as required by
    27  article  nineteen  of this chapter or any wage orders promulgated there-
    28  under.
    29    3. Existing rights. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to  dimin-
    30  ish  the rights, privileges, or remedies of any employee under any other
    31  law, rule or regulation or under any collective bargaining agreement  or
    32  employment contract.
    33    §  5.  The  executive  law is amended by adding a new section 296-e to
    34  read as follows:
    35    § 296-e. Unlawful discriminatory practices; rebuttable presumption  of
    36  discrimination.    In any action where an employee asserts a claim under
    37  this article and the employer responds by filing or threatening to  file
    38  a  claim, counterclaim, or affirmative defense seeking the forfeiture of
    39  any employment compensation, there shall  be  a  rebuttable  presumption
    40  that  such employer's action is discriminatory under section two hundred
    41  ninety-six of this article.
    42    § 6. This act shall take effect immediately.
Go to top