•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

S07872 Summary:

BILL NOS07872
 
SAME ASSAME AS A04491
 
SPONSORFAHY
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §440.30, CP L
 
Authorizes a court to order the division of criminal justice services to compare fingerprints of the defendant against the statewide database.
Go to top

S07872 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          7872
 
                               2025-2026 Regular Sessions
 
                    IN SENATE
 
                                      May 12, 2025
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by  Sen.  FAHY  --  read twice and ordered printed, and when
          printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes
 
        AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to  the  compar-
          ison of fingerprints
 
          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:

     1    Section 1. Section 440.30 of the criminal procedure law is amended  by
     2  adding a new subdivision 1-b to read as follows:
     3    1-b.  In  response to a motion under this section, the court may order
     4  the division of criminal  justice  services  to  compare  a  fingerprint
     5  obtained  in  connection  with  the  investigation or prosecution of the
     6  defendant against the  statewide  automated  fingerprint  identification
     7  system,  or  its successor system, and the national integrated automated
     8  fingerprint identification system, or its  successor  system,  upon  the
     9  court's  determination  that  (1) such fingerprint complies with federal
    10  bureau of investigation or state requirements, whichever are  applicable
    11  and as such requirements are applied to law enforcement agencies seeking
    12  such  a comparison and (2) if such comparison had been conducted, and if
    13  the results had been admitted in the trial resulting in the judgment,  a
    14  reasonable  probability  exists  that  the  verdict would have been more
    15  favorable to the defendant, or in a case involving a plea of guilty,  if
    16  the  results  had  been  available to the defendant prior to the plea, a
    17  reasonable  probability  exists  that  the  conviction  would  not  have
    18  resulted.
    19    § 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
 
 
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD06030-01-5
Go to top