•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

S08114 Summary:

BILL NOS08114
 
SAME ASSAME AS A10830
 
SPONSORCOONEY
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §141, Pub Serv L; amd §40, Hway L
 
Provides that in the siting of new electric transmission facilities, including high-voltage transmission lines, the following corridors shall be utilized in the following order of priority in accordance with feasibility of economic and engineering considerations, reliability of the electric system and the protection of the environment: existing utility corridors; highway (interstate, freeway and state trunk) and railroad corridors; recreational trails, to the extent that the facilities may be constructed below ground and that the facilities do not significantly impact environmentally sensitive areas; and new corridors; provides that the commissioner of transportation shall engage in coordination activities with a utility or transmission line developer to review requested highway corridors for possible permitted locations of transmission lines.
Go to top

S08114 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          8114
 
                               2025-2026 Regular Sessions
 
                    IN SENATE
 
                                      May 15, 2025
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by  Sen.  COONEY -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
          printed to be committed to the Committee on  Energy  and  Telecommuni-
          cations
 
        AN  ACT to amend the public service law and the highway law, in relation
          to the siting of new electric transmission facilities

          The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and  Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section  1. Section 141 of the public service law is amended by adding
     2  a new subdivision 7 to read as follows:
     3    7. (a) In the siting of new electric transmission facilities,  includ-
     4  ing  high-voltage  transmission  lines, the following corridors shall be
     5  utilized in the following order of priority in accordance with feasibil-
     6  ity of economic and engineering considerations, reliability of the elec-
     7  tric system and the protection of the environment:
     8    (i) Existing utility corridors;
     9    (ii) Highway (interstate, freeway and state trunk) and railroad corri-
    10  dors;
    11    (iii) Recreational trails, to the extent that the  facilities  may  be
    12  constructed  below  ground  and that the facilities do not significantly
    13  impact environmentally sensitive areas; and
    14    (iv) New corridors.
    15    (b) (i) High-voltage transmission lines, pursuant to the laws of  this
    16  state  or  the  ordinance  of  any  city  or county, may be constructed,
    17  placed, or maintained across any public right of way or along any  trunk
    18  highway, federally-aided state trunk highway, controlled access highway,
    19  interstate  highway,  or  roadway,  except  as  deemed  necessary by the
    20  secretary/commissioner of transportation to  protect  public  safety  or
    21  ensure the proper function of such trunk highway.
    22    (ii)  If  the  secretary/commissioner of transportation denies a high-
    23  voltage electric line collocation request, the reasons  for  the  denial
    24  shall be submitted for review to the chairs and ranking minority members
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD13020-01-5

        S. 8114                             2
 
     1  of  the committees with jurisdiction over energy and transportation, the
     2  executive secretary of the public utilities commission, and the  commis-
     3  sioner of economic development within ninety days of such denial.
     4    §  2. Section 40 of the highway law, as amended by chapter 1110 of the
     5  laws of 1971, is amended to read as follows:
     6    § 40. Authority of commissioner of transportation with respect to  the
     7  performance of contracts for construction, reconstruction or improvement
     8  of state highways, highway projects under the supervision of the depart-
     9  ment  of transportation, bridges, grade crossing eliminations and stream
    10  channel improvements; completion of  work  by  surety;  cancellation  of
    11  contract by the commissioner [of transportation].  1. The performance of
    12  every  contract for the construction, reconstruction or improvement of a
    13  state highway, bridge, grade  crossing  elimination  or  stream  channel
    14  improvement  shall  be  under the supervision and control of the commis-
    15  sioner [of transportation], and it shall be  [his]  such  commissioner's
    16  duty to see that every such contract is performed in accordance with the
    17  provisions of the contract and with the plans and specifications forming
    18  a  part thereof. If the commissioner [of transportation] shall determine
    19  that the work upon any contract for the construction, improvement, main-
    20  tenance, repair or reconstruction, of a  state  highway,  other  highway
    21  under  the  supervision  of  the department [of transportation], bridge,
    22  grade crossing elimination or stream channel improvement, is  not  being
    23  performed  according  to  the  contract  or for the best interest of the
    24  state, the execution of the work by the contractor  may  be  temporarily
    25  suspended  by  [the] such commissioner [of transportation], who may then
    26  proceed with the work under [his] their own direction in such manner  as
    27  will  accord with the contract specifications and be for the best inter-
    28  ests of the state; or [he] such commissioner may terminate the  contrac-
    29  tor's  employment under the contract while it is in progress, and there-
    30  upon, proceed with the work, in affirmance of the contract, by  contract
    31  negotiated  or  publicly  let,  by the use of [his] their own forces, by
    32  calling upon the surety to complete the  work  in  accordance  with  the
    33  plans  and  specifications  or  by a combination of any such methods; or
    34  [he] their may cancel the contract and either readvertise and  relet  as
    35  provided  in section thirty-eight of this [chapter] article, or complete
    36  the work under [his] their own direction in such manner as  will  accord
    37  with  the  contract  specifications and be for the best interests of the
    38  state. Any excess in the cost of  completing  the  contract  beyond  the
    39  price  for  which it was originally awarded shall be charged to and paid
    40  by the contractor failing to perform the work or [his] such contractor's
    41  surety.  Where the estimate for the completion of a  cancelled  contract
    42  or  defaulted  contract,  or  a contract being completed pursuant to the
    43  provisions of this section, is in excess of the balance  of  the  amount
    44  originally  set  aside  by  the  state  to provide for the construction,
    45  reconstruction, improvement, maintenance or repair of such  highway,  or
    46  other construction project, together with any amount appropriated by the
    47  county,  town  or  village  for  such  improvement, the commissioner [of
    48  transportation] is authorized to set aside from any funds available  for
    49  the  construction  or reconstruction of state highways, highway projects
    50  under the supervision of the department  [of  transportation],  bridges,
    51  grade  crossing  eliminations  and stream channel improvements, an addi-
    52  tional sum equal to such excess including the proportionate share of the
    53  county, town or village; and to pay such excess in the  first  instance,
    54  including  the share of the county, town or village, pending recovery of
    55  excess cost from the defaulting contractor or  [his]  such  contractor's
    56  surety,  as  provided in this section. In the event that the state fails

        S. 8114                             3
 
     1  to recover from the defaulting contractor or surety the excess  cost  in
     2  completing  the  contract  over  the  amount for which it was originally
     3  awarded, the county, town, or village shall pay to the  state  upon  the
     4  demand  of  the  commissioner [of transportation] the same proportion of
     5  such excess cost as was originally appropriated by the county,  town  or
     6  village,  for  the improvement, and the board of supervisors, town board
     7  or village trustees shall be subject  to  mandamus  proceedings  by  the
     8  attorney general to enforce the payment of the share of the county, town
     9  or  village  of  such  excess cost. Every contract for the construction,
    10  improvement, maintenance, repair or reconstruction of a  state  highway,
    11  highway  project under the supervision of the department [of transporta-
    12  tion], bridge, grade crossing elimination or stream channel improvement,
    13  shall reserve to the  commissioner  [of  transportation]  the  right  to
    14  suspend  or  cancel  the contract as above provided, and to complete the
    15  work thereunder by contract negotiated or publicly let or by the use  of
    16  [his] their own forces, or affirm the contract and thereupon to complete
    17  the  work  thereunder  according to any of the methods above provided as
    18  the commissioner [of transportation] may determine.
    19    2. Upon written request, the commissioner shall engage in coordination
    20  activities with a utility  or  transmission  line  developer  to  review
    21  requested  highway  corridors for possible permitted locations of trans-
    22  mission lines. A project coordinator shall  be  assigned  within  thirty
    23  days  of the written request. The department shall share all known plans
    24  with utilities on potential future projects that could impact the place-
    25  ment of a high-voltage transmission line.
    26    3. (a) When a permittable route along  a  highway  corridor  has  been
    27  identified  by  the department and the utility or developer, the depart-
    28  ment shall engage in consultation  with  the  utility  or  developer  to
    29  develop  a "constructability report" to be utilized by both parties when
    30  co-location projects are being planned and approved. The report shall be
    31  approved by both parties prior to the department issuing  a  permit  for
    32  use of the highway right-of-way.
    33    (b)  A  constructability  report  shall  be prepared by the utility in
    34  consultation with the department and shall include the terms and  condi-
    35  tions  for building the co-location project. Included within such report
    36  shall be an agreed upon timeframe  for  which  there  will  not  be  any
    37  request  by  the  department for relocation of the transmission line. If
    38  the department needs a transmission line in its right-of-way  relocated,
    39  it  shall give the utility a ten-year advance notice. Should the depart-
    40  ment require the relocation of a transmission line sooner than  what  is
    41  agreed  upon,  and/or  gives  less than a ten-year notice of relocation,
    42  then the department shall be responsible for seventy-five percent of the
    43  re-location costs.
    44    § 3. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day  after  it  shall
    45  have become a law; provided, however, that the amendments to section 141
    46  of  the  public  service  law  made by section one of this act shall not
    47  affect the repeal of such section and shall be  deemed  repealed  there-
    48  with.
Go to top