•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

S08625 Summary:

BILL NOS08625
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORMYRIE
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §5501, CPLR
 
Requires the appellate division gives the highest degree of deference to the jury's fact finding, including its assessment of damages.
Go to top

S08625 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          8625
 
                               2025-2026 Regular Sessions
 
                    IN SENATE
 
                                    December 19, 2025
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by  Sen.  MYRIE  -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
          printed to be committed to the Committee on Rules
 
        AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to setting
          the level of deference given by the appellate division to  the  jury's
          fact finding

          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section 1. Subdivision (c) of section 5501 of the civil  practice  law
     2  and  rules, as amended by chapter 474 of the laws of 1997, is amended to
     3  read as follows:
     4    (c) Appellate division. The appellate division shall review  questions
     5  of  law and questions of fact on an appeal from a judgment or order of a
     6  court of original instance and on an appeal from an order of the supreme
     7  court, a county court or an appellate term determining an appeal.    The
     8  notice  of appeal from an order directing summary judgment, or directing
     9  judgment on a motion addressed to the  pleadings,  shall  be  deemed  to
    10  specify  a  judgment upon said order entered after service of the notice
    11  of appeal and before entry of the order of the appellate court upon such
    12  appeal, without however affecting the taxation of costs upon the appeal.
    13  In reviewing a money judgment in an action in which an itemized  verdict
    14  is  required  by rule forty-one hundred eleven of this chapter [in which
    15  it is contended that the award is excessive or inadequate and that a new
    16  trial should have been granted unless a  stipulation  is  entered  to  a
    17  different award, the appellate division shall determine that an award is
    18  excessive  or  inadequate  if  it deviates materially from what would be
    19  reasonable compensation], where it is contended that the award is exces-
    20  sive or inadequate and that a new trial should have been granted  unless
    21  a  stipulation  is  entered to a different award, the appellate division
    22  shall give the highest degree of deference to the jury's  factual  find-
    23  ings,  including its assessment of damages. An award shall not be deemed
    24  excessive or inadequate unless the moving party  establishes,  by  clear
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD14193-02-5

        S. 8625                             2
 
     1  and  convincing  evidence,  that the verdict is so extraordinary that it
     2  shocks the conscience of the court and could not have  been  reached  by
     3  any  reasonable  jury. In making this determination, the appellate divi-
     4  sion  shall  consider  the  evidence  in the light most favorable to the
     5  prevailing party and shall not substitute its judgment for that  of  the
     6  jury on questions of credibility, weight of the evidence, or the quanti-
     7  fication of damages.
     8    §  2.  This act shall take effect immediately and apply to all actions
     9  filed on or after such effective date.
Go to top