•  Summary 
  •  
  •  Actions 
  •  
  •  Committee Votes 
  •  
  •  Floor Votes 
  •  
  •  Memo 
  •  
  •  Text 
  •  
  •  LFIN 
  •  
  •  Chamber Video/Transcript 

S08633 Summary:

BILL NOS08633
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORMAY
 
COSPNSR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §§812 & 154-c, add §819, Fam Ct Act; amd §§530.11 & 1.20 CP L; add §39-c, Judy L; add §256, amd §240, Dom Rel L; add Art 4 §§4-101 - 4-102, Gen Ob L
 
Relates to coercive control; provides that the family court and the criminal courts shall have concurrent jurisdiction over acts which constitute coercive control; provides that courts may issue orders of protection upon a finding of coercive control; directs the office of court administration, in consultation with the office for the prevention of domestic violence, to develop and administer training for judges and court clerks on coercive control; provides for a private cause of action for any person subject to coercive control.
Go to top

S08633 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          8633
 
                               2025-2026 Regular Sessions
 
                    IN SENATE
 
                                    December 29, 2025
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by  Sen.  MAY  --  read  twice and ordered printed, and when
          printed to be committed to the Committee on Rules
 
        AN ACT to amend the family court act, the criminal  procedure  law,  the
          judiciary  law, the general obligations law and the domestic relations
          law, in relation to coercive control

          The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and  Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section  1.  The  opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 812 of
     2  the family court act, as amended by chapter 541 of the laws of 2024,  is
     3  amended to read as follows:
     4    The  family court and the criminal courts shall have concurrent juris-
     5  diction over any proceeding concerning acts which would constitute coer-
     6  cive control as defined by section eight hundred nineteen of  this  act,
     7  disorderly conduct, unlawful dissemination or publication of an intimate
     8  image,  harassment in the first degree, harassment in the second degree,
     9  aggravated harassment in the second degree, sexual misconduct,  forcible
    10  touching,  sexual  abuse in the third degree, sexual abuse in the second
    11  degree as set forth in subdivision one of section 130.60  of  the  penal
    12  law, stalking in the first degree, stalking in the second degree, stalk-
    13  ing  in  the  third  degree,  stalking  in  the  fourth degree, criminal
    14  mischief, menacing in the second degree, menacing in the  third  degree,
    15  reckless endangerment, criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circu-
    16  lation,  strangulation  in the second degree, strangulation in the first
    17  degree, assault in the second degree, assault in the  third  degree,  an
    18  attempted assault, identity theft in the first degree, identity theft in
    19  the  second degree, identity theft in the third degree, grand larceny in
    20  the fourth degree, grand larceny in the third degree,  coercion  in  the
    21  second  degree  or coercion in the third degree as set forth in subdivi-
    22  sions one, two and three of section 135.60  of  the  penal  law  between
    23  spouses  or  former  spouses,  or  between  parent  and child or between
    24  members of the same family or household except that  if  the  respondent
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD13778-03-5

        S. 8633                             2
 
     1  would not be criminally responsible by reason of age pursuant to section
     2  30.00  of  the  penal  law,  then  the family court shall have exclusive
     3  jurisdiction  over  such  proceeding.  Notwithstanding  a  complainant's
     4  election  to  proceed  in  family court, the criminal court shall not be
     5  divested of jurisdiction to hear a family offense proceeding pursuant to
     6  this section. In any proceeding pursuant to this article, a court  shall
     7  not  deny  an  order of protection, or dismiss a petition, solely on the
     8  basis that the acts or events alleged are not relatively contemporaneous
     9  with the date of the petition, the conclusion of the fact-finding or the
    10  conclusion of the dispositional hearing. For purposes of  this  article,
    11  "disorderly  conduct" includes disorderly conduct not in a public place.
    12  For purposes of this article, "members of the same family or  household"
    13  shall mean the following:
    14    §  2.  The opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 530.11 of the
    15  criminal procedure law, as amended by chapter 541 of the laws  of  2024,
    16  is amended to read as follows:
    17    The  family court and the criminal courts shall have concurrent juris-
    18  diction over any proceeding concerning acts which would constitute coer-
    19  cive control as defined by section eight hundred nineteen of the  family
    20  court  act, disorderly conduct, unlawful dissemination or publication of
    21  an intimate image, harassment in the first  degree,  harassment  in  the
    22  second  degree,  aggravated  harassment  in  the  second  degree, sexual
    23  misconduct, forcible touching, sexual abuse in the third degree,  sexual
    24  abuse  in  the  second degree as set forth in subdivision one of section
    25  130.60 of the penal law, stalking in the first degree, stalking  in  the
    26  second  degree,  stalking  in  the  third degree, stalking in the fourth
    27  degree, criminal mischief, menacing in the second  degree,  menacing  in
    28  the  third  degree,  reckless  endangerment,  strangulation in the first
    29  degree, strangulation in the  second  degree,  criminal  obstruction  of
    30  breathing or blood circulation, assault in the second degree, assault in
    31  the  third  degree,  an  attempted  assault, identity theft in the first
    32  degree, identity theft in the second degree, identity theft in the third
    33  degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, grand larceny in  the  third
    34  degree, coercion in the second degree or coercion in the third degree as
    35  set  forth  in  subdivisions one, two and three of section 135.60 of the
    36  penal law between spouses or former spouses, or between parent and child
    37  or between members of the same family or household except  that  if  the
    38  respondent would not be criminally responsible by reason of age pursuant
    39  to  section  30.00  of  the  penal law, then the family court shall have
    40  exclusive  jurisdiction  over   such   proceeding.   Notwithstanding   a
    41  complainant's  election  to  proceed in family court, the criminal court
    42  shall not be divested of jurisdiction to hear a family offense  proceed-
    43  ing  pursuant to this section. For purposes of this section, "disorderly
    44  conduct" includes disorderly  conduct  not  in  a  public  place.    For
    45  purposes of this section, "members of the same family or household" with
    46  respect to a proceeding in the criminal courts shall mean the following:
    47    §  3. Section 154-c of the family court act is amended by adding a new
    48  subdivision 4 to read as follows:
    49    4. Coercive control. The court may issue an order of protection upon a
    50  finding of coercive control, as defined by section eight  hundred  nine-
    51  teen  of  this  act, based on a preponderance of the evidence. The court
    52  shall update any forms used for the purpose of requesting  an  order  of
    53  protection  to  include  coercive  control  as  a  basis for an order of
    54  protection. Continued coercive control engaged in after the issuance  of
    55  an  order  of  protection  may serve as evidence supporting a finding of
    56  contempt in accordance with the penal law.

        S. 8633                             3
 
     1    § 4. The judiciary law is amended by adding a new section 39-c to read
     2  as follows:
     3    §  39-c.  Coercive  control  training.  1.  For  the  purposes of this
     4  section, "coercive control" shall have the same meaning as such term  is
     5  defined by section eight hundred nineteen of the family court act.
     6    2.  (a)  The  office of court administration, in consultation with the
     7  office for the prevention of domestic violence, shall develop and admin-
     8  ister mandatory  training  for  judges  and  court  clerks  on  coercive
     9  control.
    10    (b) Such training shall cover:
    11    (i) the statutory definition of coercive control;
    12    (ii) patterns of conduct;
    13    (iii) evidentiary considerations;
    14    (iv) application in order of protection proceedings;
    15    (v) survivor safety; and
    16    (vi)  the  impact on children and implications for custody and visita-
    17  tion.
    18    (c) Judges and relevant court personnel shall be required  to  partic-
    19  ipate in refresher training at least once every five years.
    20    (d)  The office of court administration shall be authorized to prepare
    21  bench cards, guidance, and forms to support the implementation  of  such
    22  training.
    23    § 5. The domestic relations law is amended by adding a new section 256
    24  to read as follows:
    25    §  256.  Coercive control. 1. For the purposes of this section, "coer-
    26  cive control" shall have the same meaning as such  term  is  defined  by
    27  section eight hundred nineteen of the family court act.
    28    2.  The court may issue an order of protection upon a finding of coer-
    29  cive control, based on a preponderance of the evidence. The court  shall
    30  update  any  forms  used  for  the  purpose  of  requesting  an order of
    31  protection to include coercive control  as  a  basis  for  an  order  of
    32  protection.
    33    3.  The  order  of protection may protect the petitioner and any minor
    34  child of the marriage or a minor child  residing  in  such  petitioner's
    35  household.
    36    § 6. Section 1.20 of the criminal procedure law is amended by adding a
    37  new subdivision 46 to read as follows:
    38    46. "Coercive control" means coercive control defined by section eight
    39  hundred nineteen of the family court act.
    40    §  7.  The  family court act is amended by adding a new section 819 to
    41  read as follows:
    42    § 819. Coercive control. 1. As used in this chapter, the  term  "coer-
    43  cive  control" shall mean a pattern of behavior used to dominate, intim-
    44  idate, or subordinate another person that, in purpose or effect,  unrea-
    45  sonably  and  capriciously  interferes  with  that  person's  free will,
    46  personal liberty, or autonomy.   Coercive  control  shall  include,  but
    47  shall not be limited to:
    48    (a)  isolating the person from friends, relatives, or other sources of
    49  support;
    50    (b) controlling, monitoring, or restricting movements, communications,
    51  or access to services;
    52    (c) regulating or monitoring economic resources, controlling access to
    53  money, employment, or credit;
    54    (d) restricting or interfering with access to housing, transportation,
    55  health care, or employment;

        S. 8633                             4
 
     1    (e)  threatening,  intimidating,  or  harassing  conduct  designed  to
     2  instill fear or compliance;
     3    (f) monitoring, controlling, or misusing digital devices, accounts, or
     4  online activity;
     5    (g)  misusing  legal  or  administrative processes to harass or intim-
     6  idate; and
     7    (h) repeated verbal degradation, humiliation, or intimidation.
     8    2. Coercive control shall not  include  reasonable  actions  taken  to
     9  protect  a person's safety, welfare, or care, or the reasonable exercise
    10  of lawful authority.
    11    § 8. The opening paragraph  of  paragraph  (a)  of  subdivision  1  of
    12  section  240 of the domestic relations law, as amended by chapter 567 of
    13  the laws of 2015, is amended to read as follows:
    14    In any action or proceeding brought (1) to  annul  a  marriage  or  to
    15  declare  the nullity of a void marriage, or (2) for a separation, or (3)
    16  for a divorce, or (4) to obtain, by a writ of habeas corpus or by  peti-
    17  tion and order to show cause, the custody of or right to visitation with
    18  any  child  of  a  marriage, the court shall require verification of the
    19  status of any child of the marriage with respect to such child's custody
    20  and support, including any prior orders,  and  shall  enter  orders  for
    21  custody  and  support  as,  in the court's discretion, justice requires,
    22  having regard to the circumstances of the case  and  of  the  respective
    23  parties  and  to  the  best  interests  of  the child and subject to the
    24  provisions of subdivision one-c of this section. Where either  party  to
    25  an  action  concerning  custody of or a right to visitation with a child
    26  alleges in a sworn petition or complaint or  sworn  answer,  cross-peti-
    27  tion,  counterclaim  or  other  sworn responsive pleading that the other
    28  party has committed an act of domestic violence or coercive control,  as
    29  defined  by  section  eight  hundred  nineteen  of the family court act,
    30  against the party making the allegation or a family or household  member
    31  of  either party, as such family or household member is defined in arti-
    32  cle eight of the family court act, and such allegations are proven by  a
    33  preponderance  of  the  evidence,  the court must consider the effect of
    34  such domestic violence or coercive control upon the  best  interests  of
    35  the child, together with such other facts and circumstances as the court
    36  deems  relevant in making a direction pursuant to this section and state
    37  on the record how such findings, facts and circumstances  factored  into
    38  the  direction.  If  a  parent  makes a good faith allegation based on a
    39  reasonable belief supported by facts that the child  is  the  victim  of
    40  child  abuse, child neglect, or the effects of domestic violence, and if
    41  that parent acts lawfully and in good faith in response to that  reason-
    42  able  belief  to protect the child or seek treatment for the child, then
    43  that parent shall not be deprived of custody, visitation or contact with
    44  the child, or restricted in custody, visitation or contact, based solely
    45  on that belief or the reasonable actions taken based on that belief.  If
    46  an  allegation that a child is abused is supported by a preponderance of
    47  the evidence, then the court shall consider such evidence  of  abuse  in
    48  determining  the  visitation arrangement that is in the best interest of
    49  the child, and the court shall not place a child in  the  custody  of  a
    50  parent  who presents a substantial risk of harm to that child, and shall
    51  state on the record how such findings were factored  into  the  determi-
    52  nation. Where a proceeding filed pursuant to article ten or ten-A of the
    53  family  court act is pending at the same time as a proceeding brought in
    54  the supreme court involving the custody of, or right to visitation with,
    55  any child of a marriage, the court presiding over the  proceeding  under
    56  article ten or ten-A of the family court act may jointly hear the dispo-

        S. 8633                             5
 
     1  sitional  hearing  on  the  petition under article ten or the permanency
     2  hearing under article ten-A of the family court act and,  upon  referral
     3  from  the supreme court, the hearing to resolve the matter of custody or
     4  visitation  in  the  proceeding  pending  in the supreme court; provided
     5  however, the court must determine custody or  visitation  in  accordance
     6  with the terms of this section.
     7    §  9. The general obligations law is amended by adding a new article 4
     8  to read as follows:
     9                                  ARTICLE 4
    10                    RIGHT OF ACTION FOR COERCIVE CONTROL
    11  Section 4-101. Definitions.
    12          4-102. Right of action for coercive control.
    13    §  4-101.  Definitions. As used in this article,  the  term  "coercive
    14  control"  shall have the same meaning as such term is defined by section
    15  eight hundred nineteen of the family court act.
    16    §  4-102. Right of action for coercive control. 1. In addition to  any
    17  other  remedy  provided by law, any person subjected to coercive control
    18  shall have a cause of action against the  person  who  engaged  in  such
    19  conduct.  An  action or proceeding under this article shall be commenced
    20  in the supreme court of the county in which the act  or  acts  allegedly
    21  occurred or in which any party resides.
    22    2. A plaintiff may recover damages, including but not limited to:
    23    (a) compensatory damages for economic loss and out-of-pocket costs;
    24    (b) damages for emotional distress;
    25    (c) punitive damages where appropriate; and
    26    (d) reasonable attorney's fees and costs.
    27    3.    No  action  shall lie under this section based solely on conduct
    28  that constitutes the reasonable exercise of parental authority or super-
    29  vision.
    30    4.  The remedies provided by this section  are  in  addition  to,  and
    31  shall  not  preclude,  any  other remedies or causes of action available
    32  under law, including orders of protection.
    33    5. An action under this section shall be commenced  within  six  years
    34  from the last act of coercive control forming the basis of the action.
    35    6. In any action brought pursuant to this section, the court may order
    36  such  equitable  relief  as  it deems just and proper, including but not
    37  limited to injunctions, declaratory relief, and orders  restraining  the
    38  defendant from continuing coercive control.
    39    7.  The  protections of this section shall not be waived by any agree-
    40  ment, contract, or other private arrangement, and any  purported  waiver
    41  shall be void as against public policy.
    42    §  10.  This  act  shall  take effect on the one hundred eightieth day
    43  after it shall have become a law. Effective  immediately  the  addition,
    44  amendment  and/or  repeal  of  any  rule or regulation necessary for the
    45  implementation of this act on its effective date are  authorized  to  be
    46  made and completed on or before such date.
Go to top