- Summary
- Actions
- Committee Votes
- Floor Votes
- Memo
- Text
- LFIN
- Chamber Video/Transcript
AB430 Summary:
BILL NO | A00430 |
  | |
SAME AS | SAME AS S02628 |
  | |
SPONSOR | Rosenthal L |
  | |
COSPNSR | Zebrowski, Gottfried, Cahill, Perry, Weprin, De La Rosa, Cruz, Abinanti, Colton, Simon, Otis, Barron |
  | |
MLTSPNSR | Galef |
  | |
Add 52-c, Civ Rts L | |
  | |
Requires prior written notice upon hiring to all employees, informing them of the types of electronic monitoring which may occur; provides employers shall also post the notice of electronic monitoring. |
AB430 Actions:
BILL NO | A00430 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
01/06/2021 | referred to labor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/11/2021 | reported referred to codes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/19/2021 | reported referred to rules | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/24/2021 | reported | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/24/2021 | rules report cal.69 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/24/2021 | ordered to third reading rules cal.69 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/02/2021 | passed assembly | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/02/2021 | delivered to senate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/02/2021 | REFERRED TO RULES | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/09/2021 | SUBSTITUTED FOR S2628 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/09/2021 | 3RD READING CAL.965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/09/2021 | PASSED SENATE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/09/2021 | RETURNED TO ASSEMBLY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10/27/2021 | delivered to governor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11/08/2021 | signed chap.583 |
AB430 Committee Votes:
Joyner | Aye | Brabenec | Nay | ||||||
Abbate | Aye | DiPietro | Nay | ||||||
Perry | Aye | Byrne | Nay | ||||||
Colton | Aye | Morinello | Nay | ||||||
Benedetto | Aye | DeStefano | Nay | ||||||
Hevesi | Aye | Schmitt | Nay | ||||||
Bronson | Aye | Durso | Aye | ||||||
Rodriguez | Aye | Giglio | Nay | ||||||
Rozic | Aye | ||||||||
Simon | Aye | ||||||||
Steck | Aye | ||||||||
Barnwell | Aye | ||||||||
Richardson | Aye | ||||||||
Rosenthal | Absent | ||||||||
Cruz | Aye | ||||||||
Reyes | Aye | ||||||||
De La Rosa | Aye | ||||||||
Ramos | Aye | ||||||||
Jacobson | Aye | ||||||||
Burgos | Aye | ||||||||
Zinerman | Aye | ||||||||
Dinowitz | Aye | Morinello | Nay | ||||||
Pretlow | Aye | Giglio | Nay | ||||||
Cook | Aye | Montesano | Nay | ||||||
Cymbrowitz | Aye | Reilly | Nay | ||||||
O'Donnell | Excused | Mikulin | Nay | ||||||
Lavine | Aye | Tannousis | Nay | ||||||
Perry | Aye | ||||||||
Abinanti | Aye | ||||||||
Weprin | Aye | ||||||||
Hevesi | Aye | ||||||||
Fahy | Aye | ||||||||
Seawright | Aye | ||||||||
Rosenthal | Aye | ||||||||
Walker | Aye | ||||||||
Vanel | Aye | ||||||||
Cruz | Aye | ||||||||
Heastie | Excused | Barclay | Nay | ||||||
Gottfried | Aye | Hawley | Nay | ||||||
Nolan | Excused | Giglio | Nay | ||||||
Weinstein | Aye | Blankenbush | Nay | ||||||
Pretlow | Aye | Norris | Nay | ||||||
Cook | Aye | Montesano | Nay | ||||||
Glick | Aye | Ra | Nay | ||||||
Aubry | Aye | Brabenec | Nay | ||||||
Englebright | Aye | ||||||||
Dinowitz | Aye | ||||||||
Colton | Aye | ||||||||
Magnarelli | Aye | ||||||||
Perry | Aye | ||||||||
Paulin | Aye | ||||||||
Peoples-Stokes | Aye | ||||||||
Benedetto | Aye | ||||||||
Lavine | Aye | ||||||||
Lupardo | Aye | ||||||||
Zebrowski | Aye | ||||||||
Thiele | Aye | ||||||||
Braunstein | Aye | ||||||||
Dickens | Aye | ||||||||
Davila | Aye | ||||||||
Go to top
AB430 Floor Votes:
Yes
Abbate
Yes
Clark
Yes
Frontus
No
Lalor
Yes
Paulin
Yes
Sillitti
Yes
Abinanti
Yes
Colton
Yes
Galef
Yes
Lavine
Yes
Peoples-Stokes
Yes
Simon
Yes
Anderson
Yes
Conrad
Yes
Gallagher
No
Lawler
Yes
Perry
No
Simpson
No
Angelino
Yes
Cook
No
Gallahan
No
Lemondes
Yes
Pheffer Amato
No
Smith
No
Ashby
Yes
Cruz
No
Gandolfo
Yes
Lunsford
Yes
Pichardo
No
Smullen
Yes
Aubry
Yes
Cusick
No
Giglio JA
Yes
Lupardo
Yes
Pretlow
Yes
Solages
No
Barclay
Yes
Cymbrowitz
No
Giglio JM
Yes
Magnarelli
Yes
Quart
Yes
Steck
Yes
Barnwell
Yes
Darling
Yes
Glick
Yes
Mamdani
No
Ra
No
Stern
Yes
Barrett
Yes
Davila
Yes
Gonzalez-Rojas
No
Manktelow
Yes
Rajkumar
Yes
Stirpe
Yes
Barron
Yes
De La Rosa
No
Goodell
Yes
McDonald
Yes
Ramos
No
Tague
Yes
Benedetto
No
DeStefano
Yes
Gottfried
No
McDonough
No
Reilly
No
Tannousis
Yes
Bichotte Hermel
Yes
Dickens
Yes
Griffin
Yes
McMahon
Yes
Reyes
Yes
Taylor
No
Blankenbush
Yes
Dilan
No
Gunther
Yes
Meeks
Yes
Richardson
Yes
Thiele
No
Brabenec
Yes
Dinowitz
No
Hawley
No
Mikulin
Yes
Rivera J
Yes
Vanel
Yes
Braunstein
No
DiPietro
Yes
Hevesi
No
Miller B
Yes
Rivera JD
No
Walczyk
Yes
Bronson
No
Durso
Yes
Hunter
No
Miller M
Yes
Rodriguez
Yes
Walker
No
Brown
Yes
Eichenstein
Yes
Hyndman
Yes
Mitaynes
Yes
Rosenthal D
Yes
Wallace
Yes
Burdick
Yes
Englebright
Yes
Jackson
No
Montesano
Yes
Rosenthal L
No
Walsh
Yes
Burgos
Yes
Epstein
Yes
Jacobson
No
Morinello
Yes
Rozic
Yes
Weinstein
Yes
Burke
Yes
Fahy
Yes
Jean-Pierre
Yes
Niou
No
Salka
Yes
Weprin
No
Buttenschon
Yes
Fall
No
Jensen
ER
Nolan
No
Santabarbara
Yes
Williams
No
Byrne
Yes
Fernandez
No
Jones
No
Norris
Yes
Sayegh
No
Woerner
No
Byrnes
No
Fitzpatrick
Yes
Joyner
No
O'Donnell
No
Schmitt
Yes
Zebrowski
Yes
Cahill
ER
Forrest
Yes
Kelles
Yes
Otis
Yes
Seawright
Yes
Zinerman
Yes
Carroll
No
Friend
Yes
Kim
No
Palmesano
Yes
Septimo
Yes
Mr. Speaker
‡ Indicates voting via videoconference
AB430 Memo:
Go to topNEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION
submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)   BILL NUMBER: A430 SPONSOR: Rosenthal L
  TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the civil rights law, in relation to electronic monitor- ing   PURPOSE: This bill requires private employers who engage in monitoring or inter- cepting electronic communications of any employee by any electronic device or system to provide notice of such monitoring.   SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section one amends the civil rights law by adding a new section 52-c. Subdivision 1 defines for the purposes of the section the term employer, which shall not include the state or any political subdivision of the state. Subdivision 2 requires private employers engaging in electronic monitor- ing, which includes monitoring or otherwise intercepting telephone conversations or transmissions, electronic mail or transmission, or internet usage of or by the employee, by any electronic device or system, to give prior notice to employees in writing, in an electronic record, or in another electronic form. The notice must be acknowledged by the employee either in writing or electronically. Employers are also required to post the notice in a conspicuous place which is readily accessible to employees. The notice shall contain the form of communi- cation and/or computer usage that will be monitored, means by which monitoring will be accomplished, frequency of monitoring, and manner in which the information will be collected, stored, and used. Subdivision 3 allows courts to award damages and reasonable attorneys, fees to a prevailing plaintiff as well as afford injunctive relief against any employer that commits or proposes to commit a violation of this section. Subdivision 4 authorizes the attorney general to enforce the provisions of the section. Any employer in violation of this section shall be subject to a maximum civil penalty of five hundred dollars for the first offense, one thousand dollars for the second offense and three thousand dollars for the third and each subsequent offense. Subdivision 5: This section does not apply to processes undertaken by employers to manage the type or volume of incoming or outgoing electronic mail or telephone voice mail or Internet usage for the purpose of computer system mainte- nance and/or protection. Section two sets forth the effective date.   JUSTIFICATION: Notifying employees of computer monitoring protects employee privacy by making sure that they understand the consequences of inappropriate internet activity. According to the American Management Agency's 2007 Electronic Monitoring and Surveillance Survey, bosses who fired employ- ees for Internet misuse cited the two main reasons as violation of company policy and excessive personal use. By making guidelines of appropriate and inappropriate Internet use public, employees will be less likely to undermine company standards. Companies will retain the right to monitor computer usage, simply with the stipulation that employees are informed of surveillance practices. This knowledge will increase transparency within the organization and help to avoid lawsuits and litigation regarding invasion of privacy. Notification of computer surveillance will permit employees to make informed decisions about their internet use with full knowledge of the ramifications of their actions, while supporting companies' ability to monitor internet activ- ity within their organization.   LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2019-20: A.1920-A -Advanced to Third Reading Calendar; S.4586-A -Referred to Codes 2017-18: A.5112-A - Advanced to Third Reading Calendar 2015-16: A.995 - Advanced to Third Reading Calendar; S.7875 - Referred to Investigations and Government Operations 2013-14: A.1180-A -Advanced to Third Reading Calendar; S.4676 - Referred to Codes 2011-12: A.1485-A - Ordered to Third Reading Calendar; S.5364 - Referred to Codes 2009-10: A3871-B - Passed Assembly; S.4755-A - Ordered to Third Reading Calendar 2007-08: A.11105 - Reported to Rules; S.8178 - Referred to Labor   FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None to the State.   EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect on the one hundred eightieth day after it shall have become law.
AB430 Text:
Go to top STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 430 2021-2022 Regular Sessions IN ASSEMBLY (Prefiled) January 6, 2021 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. L. ROSENTHAL, ZEBROWSKI, GOTTFRIED, CAHILL, PERRY, WEPRIN, DE LA ROSA, CRUZ, ABINANTI, COLTON -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. GALEF -- read once and referred to the Committee on Labor AN ACT to amend the civil rights law, in relation to electronic monitor- ing The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. The civil rights law is amended by adding a new section 2 52-c to read as follows: 3 § 52-c. Employers engaged in electronic monitoring; prior notice 4 required. 1. For purposes of this section, employer means any individ- 5 ual, corporation, partnership, firm, or association with a place of 6 business in the state. It shall not include the state or any political 7 subdivision of the state. 8 2. (a) Any employer who monitors or otherwise intercepts telephone 9 conversations or transmissions, electronic mail or transmissions, or 10 internet access or usage of or by an employee by any electronic device 11 or system, including but not limited to the use of a computer, tele- 12 phone, wire, radio, or electromagnetic, photoelectronic or photo-optical 13 systems, shall give prior written notice upon hiring to all employees 14 who are subject to electronic monitoring. The notice required by this 15 subdivision shall be in writing, in an electronic record, or in another 16 electronic form and acknowledged by the employee either in writing or 17 electronically. Each employer shall also post the notice of electronic 18 monitoring in a conspicuous place which is readily available for viewing 19 by its employees who are subject to electronic monitoring. 20 (b) For purposes of written notice required by paragraph (a) of this 21 subdivision, an employee shall be advised that any and all telephone 22 conversations or transmissions, electronic mail or transmissions, or EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [] is old law to be omitted. LBD00537-01-1A. 430 2 1 internet access or usage by an employee by any electronic device or 2 system, including but not limited to the use of a computer, telephone, 3 wire, radio or electromagnetic, photoelectronic or photo-optical systems 4 may be subject to monitoring at any and all times and by any lawful 5 means. 6 3. The attorney general may enforce the provisions of this section. 7 Any employer found to be in violation of this section shall be subject 8 to a maximum civil penalty of five hundred dollars for the first 9 offense, one thousand dollars for the second offense and three thousand 10 dollars for the third and each subsequent offense. 11 4. The provisions of this section shall not apply to processes that 12 are designed to manage the type or volume of incoming or outgoing elec- 13 tronic mail or telephone voice mail or internet usage, that are not 14 targeted to monitor or intercept the electronic mail or telephone voice 15 mail or internet usage of a particular individual, and that are 16 performed solely for the purpose of computer system maintenance and/or 17 protection. 18 § 2. This act shall take effect on the one hundred eightieth day after 19 it shall have become a law.