A02957 Summary:
BILL NO | A02957 |
  | |
SAME AS | SAME AS S01326 |
  | |
SPONSOR | Wright (MS) |
  | |
COSPNSR | Glick, Jaffee |
  | |
MLTSPNSR | Boyland, Cook, Lavine, McEneny, Robinson |
  | |
Amd S332-b, Soc Serv L | |
  | |
Provides factors to be considered when a health care practitioner's opinion differs from that of referral's treating health care practitioner as to a disability; requires such health care practitioner to provide an explicit written determination and to present evidence when such practitioner's diagnosis differs from that of the treating health care practitioner who referred the patient. |
A02957 Actions:
BILL NO | A02957 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
01/21/2011 | referred to social services | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/24/2011 | reported | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/26/2011 | advanced to third reading cal.452 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
01/04/2012 | referred to social services | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/12/2012 | reported referred to rules | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/14/2012 | reported | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/14/2012 | rules report cal.171 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/14/2012 | ordered to third reading rules cal.171 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/20/2012 | passed assembly | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/20/2012 | delivered to senate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/20/2012 | REFERRED TO RULES |
A02957 Floor Votes:
Yes
Abbate
Yes
Ceretto
Yes
Glick
Yes
Lentol
No
Murray
Yes
Ryan
Yes
Abinanti
Yes
Clark
Yes
Goldfeder
Yes
Lifton
Yes
Nolan
No
Saladino
No
Amedore
Yes
Colton
No
Goodell
Yes
Linares
No
Oaks
No
Sayward
Yes
Arroyo
ER
Conte
Yes
Gottfried
No
Lopez PD
Yes
O'Donnell
Yes
Scarborough
Yes
Aubry
Yes
Cook
No
Graf
Yes
Lopez VJ
Yes
Ortiz
Yes
Schimel
No
Barclay
No
Corwin
Yes
Gunther
No
Losquadro
No
Palmesano
Yes
Schimminger
Yes
Barrett
Yes
Crespo
No
Hanna
Yes
Lupardo
Yes
Paulin
Yes
Simanowitz
Yes
Barron
No
Crouch
No
Hawley
Yes
Magee
Yes
Peoples Stokes
Yes
Simotas
Yes
Benedetto
No
Curran
Yes
Heastie
Yes
Magnarelli
ER
Perry
Yes
Skartados
No
Blankenbush
Yes
Cusick
Yes
Hevesi
Yes
Maisel
Yes
Pretlow
Yes
Smardz
Yes
Boyland
Yes
Cymbrowitz
Yes
Hikind
Yes
Malliotakis
Yes
Quart
Yes
Stevenson
No
Boyle
Yes
DenDekker
Yes
Hooper
Yes
Markey
Yes
Ra
Yes
Sweeney
Yes
Braunstein
Yes
Dinowitz
Yes
Jacobs
Yes
Mayer
No
Rabbitt
Yes
Tedisco
Yes
Brennan
No
Duprey
Yes
Jaffee
No
McDonough
Yes
Raia
No
Tenney
Yes
Brindisi
Yes
Englebright
ER
Jeffries
Yes
McEneny
Yes
Ramos
Yes
Thiele
Yes
Bronson
Yes
Espinal
No
Johns
Yes
McKevitt
No
Reilich
Yes
Titone
Yes
Brook Krasny
Yes
Farrell
No
Jordan
No
McLaughlin
Yes
Reilly
Yes
Titus
No
Burling
No
Finch
No
Katz
ER
Meng
Yes
Rivera J
No
Tobacco
No
Butler
No
Fitzpatrick
Yes
Kavanagh
No
Miller D
Yes
Rivera N
No
Walter
Yes
Cahill
No
Friend
Yes
Kearns
No
Miller JM
Yes
Rivera PM
Yes
Weinstein
No
Calhoun
Yes
Gabryszak
ER
Kellner
Yes
Miller MG
Yes
Roberts
Yes
Weisenberg
Yes
Camara
Yes
Galef
No
Kolb
Yes
Millman
Yes
Robinson
Yes
Weprin
Yes
Canestrari
Yes
Gantt
ER
Lancman
No
Montesano
Yes
Rodriguez
Yes
Wright
Yes
Castelli
Yes
Gibson
Yes
Latimer
Yes
Morelle
Yes
Rosenthal
Yes
Zebrowski
Yes
Castro
No
Giglio
Yes
Lavine
Yes
Moya
Yes
Russell
Yes
Mr. Speaker
‡ Indicates voting via videoconference
A02957 Text:
Go to top STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 2957 2011-2012 Regular Sessions IN ASSEMBLY January 21, 2011 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. WRIGHT, GLICK, JAFFEE -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. COOK, LAVINE, McENENY, ROBINSON -- read once and referred to the Committee on Social Services AN ACT to amend the social services law, in relation to establishing factors to be considered when a health care practitioner upon exam- ination has a different opinion from an applicant's treating health care practitioner's opinion as to an applicant's disability; and requiring an explicit written determination by the health care practi- tioner when the diagnoses differ The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. Section 332-b of the social services law is amended by 2 adding two new subdivisions 4-a and 4-b to read as follows: 3 4-a. If the practitioner to whom the individual is referred pursuant 4 to subdivision four or paragraph (b) of subdivision two of this section 5 issues an opinion that differs from the applicant's treating health care 6 practitioner, the practitioner must provide an explicit written determi- 7 nation as to why the practitioner disagrees with the applicant's treat- 8 ing health care practitioner's disability determination and present 9 evidence that supports the opinion. 10 4-b. In the event the practitioner to whom the individual is referred 11 pursuant to subdivision four or paragraph (b) of subdivision two of this 12 section issues an opinion that differs from the applicant's treating 13 health care practitioner's opinion, the applicant's treating health care 14 practitioner's opinion is generally controlling, subject to, but not 15 limited to, the following factors: 16 (a) the length and frequency of the treatment provided, 17 (b) consistency of the opinion with the record as a whole, 18 (c) the degree to which the opinion is supported by concrete evidence, 19 and 20 (d) the practitioner's specialty. 21 § 2. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall 22 have become a law. EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [] is old law to be omitted. LBD04846-01-1