A05056 Summary:

BILL NOA05056
 
SAME ASSAME AS S03757
 
SPONSORHevesi
 
COSPNSRJaffee, McDonald, Titone, Otis, Gottfried, Ortiz, Montesano, Friend, Garbarino, Raia, Galef, Abinanti
 
MLTSPNSRBarclay, Braunstein, Brennan, Cook, Duprey, Englebright, Magee, Markey, McLaughlin, Mosley, Rivera, Simon, Walter
 
Add S8-c, St Fin L; amd S2803, Pub Auth L
 
Authorizes an enterprise approach to the detection and prevention of fraud, waste and abuse in state government and the detection and prevention of improper payments of public moneys.
Go to top    

A05056 Actions:

BILL NOA05056
 
02/10/2015referred to governmental operations
04/28/2015reported referred to codes
05/04/2015reported referred to ways and means
05/27/2015reported
05/29/2015advanced to third reading cal.487
06/01/2015passed assembly
06/01/2015delivered to senate
06/01/2015REFERRED TO FINANCE
06/18/2015SUBSTITUTED FOR S3757
06/18/2015PASSED SENATE
06/18/2015RETURNED TO ASSEMBLY
12/09/2015delivered to governor
12/21/2015signed chap.566
12/21/2015approval memo.23
Go to top

A05056 Committee Votes:

Go to top

A05056 Floor Votes:

DATE:06/01/2015Assembly Vote  YEA/NAY: 144/0
Yes
Abbate
Yes
Corwin
Yes
Goodell
Yes
Lupardo
Yes
Paulin
Yes
Silver
Yes
Abinanti
Yes
Crespo
ER
Gottfried
Yes
Lupinacci
Yes
Peoples-Stokes
Yes
Simanowitz
Yes
Arroyo
Yes
Crouch
Yes
Graf
Yes
Magee
Yes
Perry
Yes
Simon
Yes
Aubry
Yes
Curran
Yes
Gunther
Yes
Magnarelli
Yes
Persaud
Yes
Simotas
Yes
Barclay
Yes
Cusick
Yes
Hawley
Yes
Malliotakis
Yes
Pichardo
Yes
Skartados
Yes
Barrett
Yes
Cymbrowitz
Yes
Hevesi
ER
Markey
Yes
Pretlow
Yes
Skoufis
Yes
Barron
Yes
Davila
Yes
Hikind
Yes
Mayer
Yes
Quart
Yes
Solages
Yes
Benedetto
Yes
DenDekker
Yes
Hooper
Yes
McDonald
Yes
Ra
Yes
Stec
Yes
Bichotte
Yes
Dilan
Yes
Jaffee
Yes
McDonough
Yes
Raia
Yes
Steck
Yes
Blake
Yes
Dinowitz
Yes
Jean-Pierre
Yes
McKevitt
Yes
Ramos
Yes
Stirpe
Yes
Blankenbush
Yes
DiPietro
Yes
Johns
Yes
McLaughlin
Yes
Richardson
Yes
Tedisco
Yes
Borelli
Yes
Duprey
Yes
Joyner
Yes
Miller
Yes
Rivera
Yes
Tenney
Yes
Brabenec
Yes
Englebright
Yes
Kaminsky
Yes
Montesano
Yes
Roberts
Yes
Thiele
Yes
Braunstein
Yes
Fahy
Yes
Katz
Yes
Morelle
Yes
Robinson
ER
Titone
Yes
Brennan
Yes
Farrell
Yes
Kavanagh
Yes
Mosley
Yes
Rodriguez
Yes
Titus
Yes
Brindisi
Yes
Finch
Yes
Kearns
Yes
Moya
Yes
Rosenthal
Yes
Walker
Yes
Bronson
Yes
Fitzpatrick
Yes
Kim
Yes
Murray
Yes
Rozic
Yes
Walter
Yes
Brook-Krasny
Yes
Friend
Yes
Kolb
Yes
Nojay
Yes
Russell
Yes
Weinstein
Yes
Buchwald
Yes
Galef
Yes
Lalor
Yes
Nolan
Yes
Ryan
Yes
Weprin
Yes
Butler
Yes
Gantt
ER
Lavine
Yes
Oaks
Yes
Saladino
Yes
Woerner
Yes
Cahill
Yes
Garbarino
Yes
Lawrence
Yes
O'Donnell
Yes
Santabarbara
Yes
Wozniak
Yes
Ceretto
Yes
Giglio
Yes
Lentol
Yes
Ortiz
Yes
Schimel
Yes
Wright
ER
Clark
Yes
Gjonaj
Yes
Lifton
Yes
Otis
Yes
Schimminger
Yes
Zebrowski
Yes
Colton
Yes
Glick
Yes
Linares
Yes
Palmesano
Yes
Seawright
Yes
Mr. Speaker
Yes
Cook
Yes
Goldfeder
Yes
Lopez
Yes
Palumbo
Yes
Sepulveda

‡ Indicates voting via videoconference
Go to top

A05056 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          5056
 
                               2015-2016 Regular Sessions
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                    February 10, 2015
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced by M. of A. HEVESI -- read once and referred to the Committee
          on Governmental Operations
 
        AN ACT to amend the state finance law and the public authorities law, in
          relation  to  authorizing  an enterprise approach to the detection and
          prevention of fraud, waste and  abuse  in  state  government  and  the
          detection and prevention of improper payments of public moneys
 
          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section 1. Legislative findings. (a) Fraud, waste, abuse and  improper
     2  payments  are  pervasive,  and  often  on  the  rise, in many government
     3  programs.
     4    (1) According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS),
     5  the 2011 Medicaid improper payment rate was 8.1%;
     6    (2) According to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), over  $70
     7  billion  in  improper  payments are made each year in Medicaid and Medi-
     8  care;
     9    (3) According to the U.S. Department of Labor, the  2011  unemployment
    10  insurance  payment  error  rate  was 11.2%, resulting in $5.7 billion of
    11  improper payments;
    12    (4) According to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the tax  gap  for
    13  federal income tax is at least $270 billion per year;
    14    (5)  In  the  2012 filing season, IRS estimated losses due to identity
    15  theft alone at $5 billion, and detected an additional $12 billion.
    16    (b) Entities involved in perpetrating fraud and  abuse  of  government
    17  programs  are  becoming increasingly more sophisticated in their schemes
    18  and tactics, and often work in organized and collusive  fraud  rings  or
    19  networks  to  attack  any and all government programs. The fraud schemes
    20  can be massive, as illustrated in the following recent cases:
    21    (1)   October   2010:   73   defendants,   $163   million   in   false
    22  Medicare/Medicaid billings, Armenian-American fraud ring;
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD04637-02-5

        A. 5056                             2
 
     1    (2)   February   2011:   20   defendants,   $200   million   in  false
     2  Medicare/Medicaid billings, Florida;
     3    (3)   February   2011:   111   defendants,   $225   million  in  false
     4  Medicare/Medicaid billings, 7 cities;
     5    (4) April 2011: 3 defendants, $3.9 million in  food  stamp  47  fraud,
     6  Texas;
     7    (5)   September   2011:   91   defendants,   $295   million  in  false
     8  Medicare/Medicaid billings, 8 cities;
     9    (6)   October   2012:   91   defendants,   $430   million   in   false
    10  Medicare/Medicaid billings, 7 cities.
    11    (c) Fraud, waste, abuse and improper payments can adversely affect the
    12  state budget, impede economic development, and deplete benefits intended
    13  for citizens in need.
    14    (d)  The  state  constitution requires the state comptroller to, among
    15  other things,  audit  all  vouchers  before  payment  and  all  official
    16  accounts  and,  in such respect, the legislature shall define the powers
    17  and duties of the office and may assign to the state comptroller  admin-
    18  istrative  duties  incidental  to the performance of these functions and
    19  the state comptroller has the constitutional authority to supervise  the
    20  accounts  of public corporations commonly referred to as public authori-
    21  ties. Statutorily, the state comptroller has the duty to superintend the
    22  fiscal concerns of the state.
    23    (d-1) In the performance of the state comptroller's constitutional and
    24  statutory functions, duties and responsibilities, the  state's  citizens
    25  expect  state  agencies  to  utilize modern techniques and technology to
    26  prevent tax dollars from being spent on fraudulent or improper payments.
    27    (e) Identifying possible waste, fraud, abuse and the improper payments
    28  of public moneys at the earliest point possible will reduce  losses  and
    29  possibly  prevent  erroneous  payments  from  being made, thus providing
    30  potentially millions of dollars in cost-savings to the state.
    31    (f) State-supported citizen and employee benefits  programs,  workers'
    32  compensation,  Medicaid,  unemployment  insurance,  tax  compliance, and
    33  discretionary grants to community-based programs are areas where  it  is
    34  important  for the state to identify and prevent waste, fraud, abuse and
    35  improper payments.
    36    (g) Modern technologies  and  best  practices  exist,  and  have  been
    37  deployed  successfully in the commercial sector for many years, that can
    38  greatly reduce the  losses  associated  with  fraud,  waste,  abuse  and
    39  improper payments.
    40    (h)  An  enterprise  approach  to  reducing  waste,  fraud, abuse, and
    41  improper payments coordinates efforts with  more  than  one  agency  and
    42  incorporates  data  from  multiple  data  sources  within  an agency and
    43  between two or more agencies. This type of approach allows state govern-
    44  ment to utilize its rich data assets across  agencies  and  programs  to
    45  better  detect improper behaviors, and to leverage economies of scale to
    46  reduce overall costs for fraud detection and prevention across all state
    47  government programs and functions.
    48    § 2. The state finance law is amended by adding a new section  8-c  to
    49  read as follows:
    50    §  8-c. Enterprise fraud prevention and detection system. 1. In furth-
    51  erance of the  comptroller's  constitutional  and  statutory  functions,
    52  duties  and  responsibilities,  the  comptroller  may, within his or her
    53  discretion, establish, implement and update as necessary  an  electronic
    54  data analytical enterprise fraud prevention and detection system for the
    55  prevention  of  fraud,  waste  and  abuse  in  state  government and the
    56  detection and prevention of improper payments of public moneys.

        A. 5056                             3
 
     1    2. State agencies shall fully support and  cooperate  with  the  state
     2  comptroller  by  providing  the  state  comptroller  with access to data
     3  requested by the state comptroller, in accordance with applicable  state
     4  and  federal law, to allow such data to be integrated into such analytic
     5  efforts  as  the state comptroller may deem necessary. For this purpose,
     6  the term "state agency" shall mean any of  the  following  performing  a
     7  governmental or proprietary function for the executive department of the
     8  state:  a  state  department, the state university of New York, the city
     9  university of New York, and any  board,  bureau,  division,  commission,
    10  committee, council, office or similar governmental entity.
    11    3. In support of the enterprise fraud prevention and detection system,
    12  the state comptroller shall establish protocols:
    13    (a)  for  data  sharing, secure file transfers and/or other methods to
    14  obtain real-time, regular and/or  periodic  data  from  state  agencies,
    15  provided,  however,  that  access  to such data by the state comptroller
    16  shall not waive any privilege or right of confidentiality;
    17    (b) to ensure the safety, security, integrity and privacy of all  data
    18  shared with his or her office in accordance with the system; and
    19    (c)  for  the  authorized retention and deletion of data obtained from
    20  state agencies.
    21    4. In connection with such system, the state comptroller,  in  his  or
    22  her discretion, may:
    23    (a)  develop  a  long-range  plan for preventing or detecting improper
    24  payments of public moneys, and the prevention and  detection  of  waste,
    25  fraud and abuse in government operations;
    26    (b)  acquire  technology  including, but not limited to, software that
    27  enhances the following capabilities: (i) automated detection and  alert-
    28  ing; (ii) continuous monitoring of program transactions and activity, to
    29  detect  fraud  and  improper  payments  both  prospectively  (before the
    30  payment is made) and retrospectively (after payments  are  made);  (iii)
    31  detection  of non-transactional fraud such as program eligibility issues
    32  and identify theft; and
    33    (c) evaluate potential savings resulting from such efforts.
    34    5. The state comptroller shall report annually to the  legislature  no
    35  later than the first day of September, two thousand sixteen and annually
    36  thereafter  on  the  progress,  status and results of the system created
    37  pursuant to this section and subdivision  two  of  section  twenty-eight
    38  hundred three of the public authorities law.
    39    §  3.  Section 2803 of the public authorities law, as added by chapter
    40  327 of the laws of 1958 and as renumbered by chapter 838 of the laws  of
    41  1983, is amended to read as follows:
    42    § 2803. Examination of the books and accounts of public authorities by
    43  the  state  comptroller.  1. Notwithstanding any other provision of this
    44  chapter, the state comptroller shall, from time to  time  but  not  less
    45  than  once  in every five years, examine the books and accounts of every
    46  authority or commission heretofore or hereafter continued or created  by
    47  this  chapter, including its receipts, disbursements, contracts, leases,
    48  sinking funds, investments and any other matters relating to its  finan-
    49  cial  standing. In lieu of such an examination, the state comptroller is
    50  hereby authorized to accept from every such authority or  commission  an
    51  external  examination  of  its books and accounts made at the request of
    52  such authority or commission.
    53    2. (a) The state comptroller may, pursuant  to  subdivisions  two  and
    54  three  of  section  eight-c of the state finance law, in his or her sole
    55  discretion, apply to state authorities the  electronic  data  analytical
    56  enterprise fraud prevention and detection system as provided for in such

        A. 5056                             4
 
     1  section eight-c of the state finance law. Public authorities shall fully
     2  support  and cooperate with the state comptroller by providing the state
     3  comptroller with access to data of the authority requested by the  state
     4  comptroller,  in  accordance  with  state and federal law, to allow such
     5  data to be integrated into such analytic  efforts  as  the  state  comp-
     6  troller may deem necessary.
     7    (b) For purposes of this subdivision, the term "state authority" shall
     8  have the same meaning as in subdivision one of section two of this chap-
     9  ter,  provided  that  for purposes of this subdivision, the term "public
    10  benefit corporation" as used in such subdivision one of section  two  of
    11  this  chapter  shall  have  the  same  meaning as in subdivision four of
    12  section sixty-six of the general construction law.
    13    § 4. Nothing in this act shall be construed to in  any  way  alter  or
    14  diminish any statutory or constitutional power, duty or authority of the
    15  state comptroller.
    16    § 5. This act shall take effect on the one hundred twentieth day after
    17  it shall have become a law; provided, however, that effective immediate-
    18  ly,  the  addition,  amendment  and/or  repeal of any rule or regulation
    19  necessary for the implementation of this act on its effective  date  are
    20  authorized to be made and completed on or before such effective date.
Go to top