A05639 Summary:

BILL NOA05639
 
SAME ASNo Same As
 
SPONSORKolb (MS)
 
COSPNSRHawley, Butler, Montesano, Raia, Blankenbush, Oaks, DiPietro
 
MLTSPNSRCrouch
 
Amd §3-c, rpld sub 2 ¶(d), Gen Muni L; amd §2023-a, rpld sub 2 ¶f, Ed L
 
Relates to the real property tax cap; removes the current required school district override super majority vote.
Go to top    

A05639 Actions:

BILL NOA05639
 
02/14/2017referred to ways and means
01/03/2018referred to ways and means
06/14/2018held for consideration in ways and means
Go to top

A05639 Committee Votes:

WAYS AND MEANS Chair:Weinstein DATE:06/14/2018AYE/NAY:23/10 Action: Held for Consideration
WeinsteinAyeOaksNay
LentolAyeCrouchNay
SchimmingerAyeBarclayNay
GanttExcusedFitzpatrickNay
GlickAyeHawleyNay
NolanAyeMalliotakisNay
PretlowAyeWalterNay
PerryAyeMontesanoNay
ColtonAyeCurranNay
CookAyeRaNay
CahillAye
AubryAye
HooperExcused
ThieleAye
CusickAye
OrtizAye
BenedettoAye
WeprinAye
RodriguezAye
RamosAye
BraunsteinAye
McDonaldAye
RozicAye
Peoples-StokesAye
SimotasAye

Go to top

A05639 Floor Votes:

There are no votes for this bill in this legislative session.
Go to top

A05639 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          5639
 
                               2017-2018 Regular Sessions
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                    February 14, 2017
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by  M.  of  A.  KOLB, HAWLEY, BUTLER, MONTESANO, RAIA, GRAF,
          BLANKENBUSH, OAKS, DiPIETRO -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A.  CROUCH,
          McLAUGHLIN  --  read  once  and  referred to the Committee on Ways and
          Means
 
        AN ACT to amend the general municipal law  and  the  education  law,  in
          relation  to  the  real  property  tax  cap;  and  to  repeal  certain
          provisions of such laws relating thereto
 
          The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and  Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section  1.    Legislative intent. The legislature finds that when the
     2  property tax cap was first enacted in 2011 that tangible mandate  relief
     3  is  needed  to  be coupled with the cap in order to significantly reduce
     4  property taxes.  Since enactment, no substantial mandate relief has been
     5  introduced and property taxes throughout the state continue to be  high.
     6  The  property tax cap has kept the growth in property taxes down but has
     7  done little in helping with providing the necessary relief  to  property
     8  owners. On the other hand, without mandate relief, local governments and
     9  school districts have been squeezed financially. They are now limited to
    10  a  tax  cap  that  is tied to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) that has in
    11  recent years been low. This has  forced  local  governments  and  school
    12  districts to struggle with budget concerns and a potential tax cap over-
    13  ride.    However,  the  current  lack of taxpayer appetite for a tax cap
    14  override at the school district level has  forced  school  districts  to
    15  potentially  cut  services  in  order  to  pay  for  under  and unfunded
    16  mandates. This bill would create a true two percent property tax cap  by
    17  removing  the  property  tax cap being tied to CPI and would allow for a
    18  simple majority vote to override the  cap.  The  legislature  recognizes
    19  that had real mandate relief been enacted when the cap was first enacted
    20  these  changes  would  not  have been needed. Further, these two changes
    21  would also make New York's property tax cap consistent with  neighboring
    22  state's  property tax caps. A true two percent cap would create predict-
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD03330-01-7

        A. 5639                             2
 
     1  ability and fairness to local governments and school districts. Finally,
     2  this bill would provide  state  aid  to  local  governments  and  school
     3  districts  equal  to  the year-to-year increase in levy growth under the
     4  property  tax  cap; therefore keeping property taxes flat for homeowners
     5  and small businesses.
     6    § 2. Paragraph (a) of subdivision 2 of  section  3-c  of  the  general
     7  municipal law, as added by section 1 of part A of chapter 97 of the laws
     8  of 2011, is amended to read as follows:
     9    (a)  "Allowable  levy  growth  factor"  shall be [the lesser of:  (i)]
    10  equal to one and two one-hundredths[; or (ii) the sum of  one  plus  the
    11  inflation  factor;  provided,  however,  that  in no case shall the levy
    12  growth factor be less than one].
    13    § 3. Paragraph (d) of subdivision 2 of  section  3-c  of  the  general
    14  municipal law is REPEALED.
    15    §  4.  Paragraph a of subdivision 2 of section 2023-a of the education
    16  law, as added by section 2 of part A of chapter 97 of the laws of  2011,
    17  is amended to read as follows:
    18    a. "Allowable levy growth factor" shall be [the lesser of:  (i)] equal
    19  to  one  and  two  one-hundredths[;  or  (ii)  the  sum  of one plus the
    20  inflation factor; provided, however, that in  no  case  shall  the  levy
    21  growth factor be less than one].
    22    §  5.  Paragraph f of subdivision 2 of section 2023-a of the education
    23  law is REPEALED.
    24    § 6. Subdivision 5 of section 3-c of the  general  municipal  law,  as
    25  added  by  section  1  of  part  A of chapter 97 of the laws of 2011, is
    26  amended to read as follows:
    27    5. A local government may adopt a budget that requires a tax levy that
    28  is greater than the tax levy limit  for  the  coming  fiscal  year,  not
    29  including  any  levy  necessary  to support the expenditures pursuant to
    30  subparagraphs (i) through (iv) of paragraph [g] (g) of  subdivision  two
    31  of  this  section,  only  if the governing body of such local government
    32  first enacts, by a vote of [sixty] more than fifty percent of the  total
    33  voting  power  of such body, a local law to override such limit for such
    34  coming fiscal year only, or in the case of a district or fire  district,
    35  a  resolution,  approved  by a vote of sixty percent of the total voting
    36  power of such body, to override such limit for such coming  fiscal  year
    37  only.
    38    § 7. Subdivision 6 of section 2023-a of the education law, as added by
    39  section  2  of  part  A of chapter 97 of the laws of 2011, is amended to
    40  read as follows:
    41    6. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary,  in
    42  the  event  the  trustee,  trustees  or  board  of education of a school
    43  district that is subject to the provisions of this  section  proposes  a
    44  budget  that will require a tax levy that exceeds the tax levy limit for
    45  the corresponding school year,  not  including  any  levy  necessary  to
    46  support  the  expenditures pursuant to subparagraphs (i) through (iv) of
    47  paragraph i of subdivision two of this section, then such  budget  shall
    48  be approved if [sixty] more than fifty percent of the votes cast thereon
    49  are in the affirmative.
    50    (b) Where the trustee, trustees or board of education proposes a budg-
    51  et subject to the requirements of paragraph (a) of this subdivision, the
    52  ballot for such budget shall include the following statement in substan-
    53  tially  the  same  form:  "Adoption  of  this budget requires a tax levy
    54  increase of         which exceeds the statutory tax levy increase  limit
    55  of       for this school fiscal year and therefore exceeds the state tax

        A. 5639                             3
 
     1  cap and must be approved by [sixty] more than fifty percent of the qual-
     2  ified voters present and voting."
     3    § 8. Subdivision 9 of section 2023-a of the education law, as added by
     4  section  2  of  part  A of chapter 97 of the laws of 2011, is amended to
     5  read as follows:
     6    9. Nothing in this section shall preclude the  trustee,  trustees,  or
     7  board  of  education  of  a  school  district, in their discretion, from
     8  submitting additional items of expenditures to the voters  for  approval
     9  as  separate  propositions  or  the  voters from submitting propositions
    10  pursuant to sections two thousand eight and two thousand thirty-five  of
    11  this part; provided however, except in the case of a proposition submit-
    12  ted  for any expenditure contained within subparagraphs (i) through (iv)
    13  of paragraph i of subdivision two of this section, if  any  proposition,
    14  or  propositions  collectively  that  are  subject to a vote on the same
    15  date, would require an expenditure of money that  would  require  a  tax
    16  levy  and  would  result  in  the  tax levy limit being exceeded for the
    17  corresponding school year then such proposition  shall  be  approved  if
    18  [sixty]  more  than  fifty  percent of the votes cast thereon are in the
    19  affirmative.
    20    § 9. Section 3-c of the general municipal law is amended by  adding  a
    21  new subdivision 8 to read as follows:
    22    8. A local government shall receive state aid if such local government
    23  adopts  a budget that is equal to or lower than the tax levy limit. Such
    24  state aid would be equal to a local  government's  year-to-year  adopted
    25  levy increase within the tax levy limit. In no event shall the state aid
    26  for  a  local  government  exceed  the  allowable  levy growth factor as
    27  defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision two of this section.
    28    § 10. Section 2023-a of the education law is amended by adding  a  new
    29  subdivision 10 to read as follows:
    30    10.  A school district shall receive state aid if such school district
    31  adopts a budget that is equal to or lower than the tax levy limit.  Such
    32  state  aid  would  be  equal to a school district's year-to-year adopted
    33  levy increase within the tax levy limit. In no event shall the state aid
    34  for a school district exceed the allowable levy growth factor as defined
    35  in paragraph a of subdivision two of this section.
    36    § 11. This act shall take effect immediately; provided, however,  that
    37  the  amendments  to section 3-c of the general municipal law and section
    38  2023-a of the education law made by  sections  two,  four,  six,  seven,
    39  eight,  nine  and  ten  of  this act shall not affect the repeal of such
    40  sections and shall expire and be deemed repealed therewith.
Go to top