A06265 Summary:
BILL NO | A06265 |
  | |
SAME AS | SAME AS S05188 |
  | |
SPONSOR | Kaminsky |
  | |
COSPNSR | Weinstein |
  | |
MLTSPNSR | |
  | |
Amd R3212, CPLR | |
  | |
Relates to the use of expert affidavits in summary judgment motions. |
A06265 Actions:
BILL NO | A06265 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
03/19/2015 | referred to judiciary | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
03/24/2015 | reported | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
03/27/2015 | advanced to third reading cal.163 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
04/22/2015 | passed assembly | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
04/22/2015 | delivered to senate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
04/22/2015 | REFERRED TO JUDICIARY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/15/2015 | SUBSTITUTED FOR S5188 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/15/2015 | PASSED SENATE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/15/2015 | RETURNED TO ASSEMBLY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11/30/2015 | delivered to governor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/11/2015 | signed chap.529 |
A06265 Committee Votes:
Go to topA06265 Floor Votes:
Yes
Abbate
ER
Corwin
Yes
Goodell
Yes
Lupardo
Yes
Paulin
No
Silver
Yes
Abinanti
Yes
Crespo
Yes
Gottfried
Yes
Lupinacci
Yes
Peoples-Stokes
No
Simanowitz
Yes
Arroyo
Yes
Crouch
Yes
Graf
Yes
Magee
Yes
Perry
Yes
Simon
Yes
Aubry
Yes
Curran
Yes
Gunther
Yes
Magnarelli
Yes
Persaud
Yes
Simotas
Yes
Barclay
ER
Cusick
Yes
Hawley
Yes
Malliotakis
Yes
Pichardo
Yes
Skartados
Yes
Barrett
Yes
Cymbrowitz
Yes
Hevesi
Yes
Markey
Yes
Pretlow
Yes
Skoufis
Yes
Barron
Yes
Davila
Yes
Hikind
Yes
Mayer
Yes
Quart
Yes
Solages
Yes
Benedetto
Yes
DenDekker
Yes
Hooper
Yes
McDonald
Yes
Ra
Yes
Stec
Yes
Bichotte
Yes
Dilan
Yes
Jaffee
Yes
McDonough
Yes
Raia
Yes
Steck
Yes
Blake
Yes
Dinowitz
ER
Jean-Pierre
Yes
McKevitt
Yes
Ramos
Yes
Stirpe
Yes
Blankenbush
Yes
DiPietro
Yes
Johns
Yes
McLaughlin
Yes
Rivera
Yes
Tedisco
Yes
Borelli
Yes
Duprey
Yes
Joyner
Yes
Miller
ER
Roberts
Yes
Tenney
Yes
Brabenec
Yes
Englebright
Yes
Kaminsky
Yes
Montesano
Yes
Robinson
Yes
Thiele
Yes
Braunstein
Yes
Fahy
ER
Katz
Yes
Morelle
Yes
Rodriguez
Yes
Titone
ER
Brennan
Yes
Farrell
Yes
Kavanagh
Yes
Mosley
Yes
Rosenthal
Yes
Titus
Yes
Brindisi
Yes
Finch
Yes
Kearns
Yes
Moya
Yes
Rozic
Yes
Walker
Yes
Bronson
Yes
Fitzpatrick
Yes
Kim
Yes
Murray
Yes
Russell
Yes
Walter
Yes
Brook-Krasny
Yes
Friend
Yes
Kolb
Yes
Nojay
Yes
Ryan
Yes
Weinstein
Yes
Buchwald
Yes
Galef
Yes
Lalor
Yes
Nolan
Yes
Saladino
Yes
Weprin
Yes
Butler
Yes
Gantt
Yes
Lavine
Yes
Oaks
Yes
Santabarbara
Yes
Woerner
Yes
Cahill
Yes
Garbarino
Yes
Lawrence
Yes
O'Donnell
Yes
Scarborough
Yes
Wozniak
Yes
Ceretto
Yes
Giglio
Yes
Lentol
Yes
Ortiz
Yes
Schimel
ER
Wright
Yes
Clark
Yes
Gjonaj
Yes
Lifton
Yes
Otis
Yes
Schimminger
No
Zebrowski
Yes
Colton
Yes
Glick
Yes
Linares
Yes
Palmesano
Yes
Seawright
Yes
Mr. Speaker
Yes
Cook
Yes
Goldfeder
ER
Lopez
Yes
Palumbo
Yes
Sepulveda
‡ Indicates voting via videoconference
A06265 Text:
Go to top STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 6265 2015-2016 Regular Sessions IN ASSEMBLY March 19, 2015 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. KAMINSKY, WEINSTEIN -- (at request of the Office of Court Administration) -- read once and referred to the Committee on Judiciary AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to the use of expert affidavits in summary judgment motions The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. Subdivision (b) of rule 3212 of the civil practice law and 2 rules, as amended by charter 651 of the laws of 1973, is amended to read 3 as follows: 4 (b) Supporting proof; grounds; relief to either party. A motion for 5 summary judgment shall be supported by affidavit, by a copy of the 6 pleadings and by other available proof, such as depositions and written 7 admissions. The affidavit shall be by a person having knowledge of the 8 facts; it shall recite all the material facts; and it shall show that 9 there is no defense to the cause of action or that the cause of action 10 or defense has no merit. Where an expert affidavit is submitted in 11 support of, or opposition to, a motion for summary judgment, the court 12 shall not decline to consider the affidavit because an expert exchange 13 pursuant to subparagraph (i) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of 14 section 3101 was not furnished prior to the submission of the affidavit. 15 The motion shall be granted if, upon all the papers and proof submitted, 16 the cause of action or defense shall be established sufficiently to 17 warrant the court as a matter of law in directing judgment in favor of 18 any party. Except as provided in subdivision (c) of this rule the motion 19 shall be denied if any party shall show facts sufficient to require a 20 trial of any issue of fact. If it shall appear that any party other than 21 the moving party is entitled to a summary judgment, the court may grant 22 such judgment without the necessity of a cross-motion. 23 § 2. This act shall take effect immediately and shall apply to all 24 pending cases for which a summary judgment motion is made on or after 25 the date on which it shall have become law and all cases filed on or 26 after such effective date. EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [] is old law to be omitted. LBD09373-01-5