A06641 Summary:

BILL NOA06641
 
SAME ASNo same as
 
SPONSOROaks (MS)
 
COSPNSRCorwin, Hawley, Kolb, Walter
 
MLTSPNSRBarclay, Duprey, Finch, Lalor, Raia, Saladino, Tenney
 
 
Authorizes the commissioner of taxation and finance to study feasibility of reducing the number of assessing units and equalization rates; such study shall include, but not be limited to, a review and the impact of eliminating all villages as assessing units, realignment of school district boundaries, use of current assessment roll as the base year roll, and that periodic assessment updates be completed every six years.
Go to top    

A06641 Actions:

BILL NOA06641
 
04/12/2013referred to real property taxation
06/04/2013held for consideration in real property taxation
01/08/2014referred to real property taxation
Go to top

A06641 Floor Votes:

There are no votes for this bill in this legislative session.
Go to top

A06641 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          6641
 
                               2013-2014 Regular Sessions
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                     April 12, 2013
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by  M. of A. OAKS, CORWIN, HAWLEY, KOLB, MONTESANO -- Multi-
          Sponsored by -- M. of A.  BARCLAY,  DUPREY,  FINCH,  McDONOUGH,  RAIA,
          SALADINO  --  read once and referred to the Committee on Real Property
          Taxation
 
        AN ACT in relation to  authorizing  the  commissioner  of  taxation  and

          finance  to  study the feasibility of reducing the number of assessing
          units and equalization rates
 
          The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and  Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section  1.  The  commissioner of taxation and finance shall study the
     2  feasibility of reducing the number of assessing units  and  equalization
     3  rates. Such study shall include, but not be limited to, a review and the
     4  impact of the following steps:
     5    1.  The  elimination of all villages (except coterminous) as assessing
     6  units, which now requires approximately two hundred  seventy-five  addi-
     7  tional equalization rates from being calculated each year.
     8    2. The realignment of school district boundaries to more closely agree
     9  with  town,  city  and  county  boundaries;  however, taking appropriate

    10  geographical hindrances into consideration.   The study  shall  consider
    11  the  grandfathering  of  existing  primary and secondary school children
    12  living in one and two family residences until property  is  transferred.
    13  For the purposes of this study, taxes are paid to the new district, with
    14  "tuition  money"  (taxes  collected by grandfathered properties), trans-
    15  ferred from the new district to the old district in accordance with  the
    16  appropriate  change in the education law.  This would eliminate approxi-
    17  mately fifty special segment rates currently being  performed  if  fully
    18  implemented.
    19    3.  The requirement of the commissioner of taxation and finance to use
    20  the current assessment roll as the base year roll for  its  sampling  of
    21  appraisals to increase the accuracy of special equalization rates.
 

         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD04220-01-3

        A. 6641                             2
 
     1    4.  The  requirement that the school tax roll be based on the previous
     2  year's assessment roll instead of the current year.  This would give the
     3  state four months to complete all special rates instead of  four  weeks.
     4  This  would  allow  for  subdivision  three of this section to be accom-
     5  plished.
     6    5.  The  requirement that all towns not of first class size as defined
     7  by the most current federal census and article 2 of the town law consol-
     8  idate with one or more towns or cities within the same county to  be  of

     9  sufficient size (at least four thousand parcels combined).  Any town not
    10  of  first  class  size  as  defined by the federal census, but having at
    11  least four thousand parcels of properties as  indicated  by  the  latest
    12  final  assessment  roll  would  also  be  exempt  from being required to
    13  consolidate.  If a required town fails to consolidate  by  a  designated
    14  date  or  if  a town drops out of a consolidated assessing unit and does
    15  not rejoin another consolidation, the  following  year,  the  state  may
    16  withhold the appropriate state aid monies until such time as the munici-
    17  pality complies.  All cities would be exempt from this provision; howev-
    18  er,  other cities or towns could form a consolidated assessing unit with
    19  a city.  Counties which are authorized to assess properties within their
    20  boundaries (Nassau and Tompkins) would be exempt from the  consolidation
    21  requirement.

    22    6. The requirement that periodic assessment updates be completed every
    23  six years unless the coefficient of dispersion (a statistical measure of
    24  uniformity) based on a current year of sales, is within acceptable rang-
    25  es  as currently defined for maintenance aid.  (Less than twenty, seven-
    26  teen, or fifteen depending on population per square mile as  defined  by
    27  federal  census.)  If the coefficient of dispersion is within acceptable
    28  ranges the maximum allowed time could be extended to ten years.
    29    7. The review of current procedures in  use  by  the  commissioner  of
    30  taxation  and finance in regards to the valuation of utility properties.
    31  Evaluate the current split in responsibilities of special franchise  and
    32  private  property  valuations  and  recommend  a  determination of same.
    33  Conduct additional training if necessary to allow for competency at  the
    34  local level.

    35    8.  The requirement that assessor positions will be designated as sole
    36  assessor.  The assessing unit would retain the option to make this posi-
    37  tion elected or appointed.
    38    § 2. A report of the study, outlining the impact of each of the  above
    39  steps,  shall be filed with the governor, the temporary president of the
    40  senate, the minority leader of the senate, the speaker of  the  assembly
    41  and the minority leader of the assembly on or before December 31, 2014.
    42    § 3. This act shall take effect immediately.
Go to top