A10534 Summary:

BILL NOA10534
 
SAME ASNo same as
 
SPONSORTedisco (MS)
 
COSPNSRAlfano, Amedore, Burling, Calhoun, Finch
 
MLTSPNSRBacalles, Barra, Butler, Conte, Crouch, Duprey, Giglio, Jordan, McDonough, McKevitt, Miller J, Molinaro, Oaks, Raia, Reilich, Saladino, Scozzafava, Thiele, Townsend
 
Amd SS10.06 & 10.07, Ment Hyg L
 
Allows the detention of a respondent of a "sex offender requiring civil management petition" pending trial; establishes the standard of proof at trial be "beyond a reasonable doubt" rather than "by clear and convincing evidence".
Go to top    

A10534 Actions:

BILL NOA10534
 
04/02/2010referred to mental health
Go to top

A10534 Floor Votes:

There are no votes for this bill in this legislative session.
Go to top

A10534 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                          10534
 
                   IN ASSEMBLY
 
                                      April 2, 2010
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced by M. of A. TEDISCO, ALFANO, AMEDORE, BURLING, CALHOUN, FINCH
          --  Multi-Sponsored  by  --  M.  of A. BACALLES, BARRA, BUTLER, CONTE,
          CROUCH, DUPREY, GIGLIO, JORDAN, McDONOUGH, McKEVITT, J. MILLER,  MOLI-
          NARO,  OAKS,  RAIA, REILICH, SALADINO, SCOZZAFAVA, THIELE, TOWNSEND --
          read once and referred to the Committee on Mental Health
 

        AN ACT to amend the mental hygiene law,  in  relation  to  allowing  the
          detention  of  a respondent of a "sex offender requiring civil manage-
          ment petition" pending trial, and to establish the standard  of  proof
          at  trial  be  "beyond  a  reasonable doubt" rather than "by clear and
          convincing evidence"
 
          The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and  Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section 1. Subdivision (k) of section 10.06 of the mental hygiene law,
     2  as  amended by section 1 of part H of chapter 58 of the laws of 2009, is
     3  amended to read as follows:
     4    (k) At the conclusion of the hearing, the court shall determine wheth-
     5  er there is probable cause to believe  that  the  respondent  is  a  sex
     6  offender requiring civil management. If the court determines that proba-

     7  ble  cause  has  not  been  established,  the court shall issue an order
     8  dismissing the petition,  and  the  respondent's  release  shall  be  in
     9  accordance  with other applicable provisions of law. If the court deter-
    10  mines that probable cause has been established[:  (i)  the  court  shall
    11  order  that  the  respondent be committed to a secure treatment facility
    12  designated by the commissioner for care, treatment and control upon  his
    13  or her release, provided, however, that a respondent who otherwise would
    14  be required to be transferred to a secure treatment facility may, upon a
    15  written consent signed by the respondent and his or her counsel, consent
    16  to  remain  in  the  custody  of the department of correctional services

    17  pending the outcome of the proceedings under this article, and that such
    18  consent may be revoked in writing at any time; (ii)] the court shall set
    19  a date for trial in accordance with subdivision (a) of section 10.07  of
    20  this  article.  If  respondent  is  either at liberty at the time of the
    21  hearing or eligible for release from imprisonment during the  period  of
    22  time  between  the  hearing  and the trial date, the court shall further
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD15964-01-0

        A. 10534                            2
 
     1  determine whether there is probable cause to believe that the respondent

     2  is a dangerous sex offender requiring confinement. If the  court  deter-
     3  mines  that  probable  cause  has  not been established, the court shall
     4  order  the  respondent's  release  and shall be in accordance with other
     5  applicable provisions of law, and the court shall order  the  respondent
     6  appear  for  trial. If the court determines that probable cause has been
     7  established the court shall order that the respondent be committed to  a
     8  secure  treatment  facility  designated  by  the  commissioner for care,
     9  treatment and control upon his or her release; and [(iii)] the  respond-
    10  ent shall not be released pending the completion of such trial.
    11    §  2.  Subdivision  (d) of section 10.07 of the mental hygiene law, as

    12  added by chapter 7 of the laws of 2007, is amended to read as follows:
    13    (d) The jury, or the court if a jury trial is waived, shall  determine
    14  [by clear and convincing evidence] beyond a reasonable doubt whether the
    15  respondent  is  a detained sex offender who suffers from a mental abnor-
    16  mality. The burden of proof shall be on the attorney general. A determi-
    17  nation, if made by the jury, must be by unanimous verdict.  In  charging
    18  the  jury,  the court's instructions shall include the admonishment that
    19  the jury may not find solely on the basis of the respondent's commission
    20  of a sex offense that the respondent is  a  detained  sex  offender  who
    21  suffers from a mental abnormality. In the case of a respondent committed
    22  pursuant  to  article seven hundred thirty of the criminal procedure law
    23  for a sex offense, the attorney general shall have the burden of proving

    24  [by clear and convincing evidence] beyond a reasonable  doubt  that  the
    25  respondent did engage in the conduct constituting such offense.
    26    § 3. This act shall take effect immediately.
Go to top