S03869 Summary:

BILL NOS03869A
 
SAME ASSAME AS A07239
 
SPONSORCARLUCCI
 
COSPNSRHELMING, SKOUFIS
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §1046, Fam Ct Act
 
Factors domestic violence convictions into family court decisions regarding visitation, custody and parental rights; provides that any parent undergoing mandatory, batterer specific rehabilitation measures shall only be granted supervised visitation.
Go to top    

S03869 Actions:

BILL NOS03869A
 
02/20/2019REFERRED TO CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
03/07/2019AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
03/07/2019PRINT NUMBER 3869A
01/08/2020REFERRED TO CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
Go to top

S03869 Committee Votes:

Go to top

S03869 Floor Votes:

There are no votes for this bill in this legislative session.
Go to top

S03869 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                         3869--A
 
                               2019-2020 Regular Sessions
 
                    IN SENATE
 
                                    February 20, 2019
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by Sen. CARLUCCI -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
          printed to be committed to the Committee on Children and  Families  --
          committee  discharged,  bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and
          recommitted to said committee
 
        AN ACT to amend the family court act, in relation to factoring  domestic
          violence convictions into family court decisions regarding visitation,
          custody and parental rights
 
          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section 1. Paragraphs (vii) and (viii) of subdivision (a)  of  section
     2  1046  of the family court act, paragraph (vii) as amended by chapter 432
     3  of the laws of 1993, paragraph (viii) as added by chapter  1015  of  the
     4  laws  of  1972, are amended and a new paragraph (ix) is added to read as
     5  follows:
     6    (vii) neither the privilege attaching to  confidential  communications
     7  between husband and wife, as set forth in section forty-five hundred two
     8  of  the  civil  practice  law  and  rules, nor the physician-patient and
     9  related privileges, as set forth in section forty-five hundred  four  of
    10  the civil practice law and rules, nor the psychologist-client privilege,
    11  as  set  forth in section forty-five hundred seven of the civil practice
    12  law and rules, nor the social worker-client privilege, as set  forth  in
    13  section  forty-five  hundred  eight of the civil practice law and rules,
    14  nor the rape crisis counselor-client privilege, as set forth in  section
    15  forty-five  hundred  ten of the civil practice law and rules, shall be a
    16  ground for excluding evidence which otherwise  would  be  admissible[.];
    17  and
    18    (viii) proof of the "impairment of emotional health" or "impairment of
    19  mental  or  emotional  condition"  as  a  result of the unwillingness or
    20  inability of the respondent to exercise a minimum degree of care  toward
    21  a  child  may  include  competent  opinion  or  expert testimony and may
    22  include proof that such impairment lessened during  a  period  when  the
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD01936-02-9

        S. 3869--A                          2
 
     1  child  was  in  the  care,  custody or supervision of a person or agency
     2  other than the respondent[.]; and
     3    (ix)  previous  convictions  of  disorderly conduct, harassment in the
     4  first degree, harassment in the second degree, aggravated harassment  in
     5  the  second degree, sexual misconduct forcible touching, sexual abuse in
     6  the third degree, sexual abuse in the second  degree  as  set  forth  in
     7  subdivision  one  of  section  130.60  of the penal law, stalking in the
     8  first degree, stalking in the  second  degree,  stalking  in  the  third
     9  degree,  stalking  in  the fourth degree, criminal mischief, menacing in
    10  the second degree, menacing in the third degree, reckless  endangerment,
    11  strangulation  in  the first degree, strangulation in the second degree,
    12  criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circulation, assault  in  the
    13  second  degree, assault in the third degree, an attempted assault, coer-
    14  cion in the third degree as set forth in subdivisions one, two and three
    15  of section 135.60 of the penal law between spouses or former spouses, or
    16  between parent and child or between members of the same family or house-
    17  hold except that if the respondent would not be  criminally  responsible
    18  by  reason  of  age pursuant to section 30.00 of the penal law, shall be
    19  taken into consideration for any hearing  deciding  on  the  visitation,
    20  custody, or rights of a parent with mandatory, batterer specific rehabi-
    21  litative  measures of no less than twelve months, successfully completed
    22  by the respondent prior to a final judgment; provided, however, that any
    23  parent undergoing mandatory batterer  specific  rehabilitation  measures
    24  shall only be granted supervised visitation.
    25    §  2.  This  act  shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall
    26  have become a law.
Go to top