S04888 Summary:
BILL NO | S04888A |
  | |
SAME AS | SAME AS A07140-A |
  | |
SPONSOR | STEWART-COUSINS |
  | |
COSPNSR | |
  | |
MLTSPNSR | |
  | |
  | |
Authorizes the New York city employees' retirement system to consider the application for disability retirement benefits from Peter DiMario. |
S04888 Actions:
BILL NO | S04888A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
04/30/2013 | REFERRED TO CIVIL SERVICE AND PENSIONS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/12/2013 | COMMITTEE DISCHARGED AND COMMITTED TO RULES | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/12/2013 | ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.1352 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/13/2013 | PASSED SENATE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/13/2013 | DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/13/2013 | referred to governmental employees | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
01/08/2014 | died in assembly | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
01/08/2014 | returned to senate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
01/08/2014 | REFERRED TO CIVIL SERVICE AND PENSIONS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/21/2014 | AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO CIVIL SERVICE AND PENSIONS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/21/2014 | PRINT NUMBER 4888A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/28/2014 | 1ST REPORT CAL.987 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
05/29/2014 | 2ND REPORT CAL. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/02/2014 | ADVANCED TO THIRD READING | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/11/2014 | PASSED SENATE | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/11/2014 | DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/11/2014 | referred to governmental employees | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/19/2014 | substituted for a7140a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/19/2014 | ordered to third reading rules cal.542 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/19/2014 | passed assembly | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
06/19/2014 | returned to senate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/05/2014 | DELIVERED TO GOVERNOR | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/17/2014 | VETOED MEMO.558 |
S04888 Floor Votes:
Yes
Abbate
Yes
Curran
Yes
Hawley
ER
Markey
Yes
Quart
Yes
Steck
Yes
Abinanti
Yes
Cusick
ER
Heastie
Yes
Mayer
Yes
Ra
Yes
Stirpe
ER
Arroyo
Yes
Cymbrowitz
Yes
Hennessey
Yes
McDonald
Yes
Raia
Yes
Sweeney
Yes
Aubry
Yes
Davila
Yes
Hevesi
Yes
McDonough
Yes
Ramos
Yes
Tedisco
Yes
Barclay
Yes
DenDekker
ER
Hikind
Yes
McKevitt
Yes
Rivera
ER
Tenney
Yes
Barrett
Yes
Dinowitz
Yes
Hooper
Yes
McLaughlin
Yes
Roberts
Yes
Thiele
Yes
Benedetto
Yes
DiPietro
Yes
Jacobs
Yes
Miller
ER
Robinson
Yes
Titone
Yes
Blankenbush
Yes
Duprey
Yes
Jaffee
Yes
Millman
Yes
Rodriguez
Yes
Titus
Yes
Borelli
Yes
Englebright
Yes
Johns
Yes
Montesano
Yes
Rosa
Yes
Walter
Yes
Braunstein
Yes
Fahy
Yes
Katz
Yes
Morelle
Yes
Rosenthal
Yes
Weinstein
Yes
Brennan
Yes
Farrell
Yes
Kavanagh
Yes
Mosley
Yes
Rozic
ER
Weisenberg
Yes
Brindisi
Yes
Finch
Yes
Kearns
Yes
Moya
Yes
Russell
Yes
Weprin
Yes
Bronson
Yes
Fitzpatrick
AB
Kellner
Yes
Nojay
Yes
Ryan
Yes
Wright
Yes
Brook-Krasny
Yes
Friend
Yes
Kim
Yes
Nolan
Yes
Saladino
Yes
Zebrowski
Yes
Buchwald
Yes
Galef
Yes
Kolb
Yes
Oaks
Yes
Santabarbara
Yes
Mr. Speaker
Yes
Butler
ER
Gantt
Yes
Lalor
Yes
O'Donnell
ER
Scarborough
Yes
Cahill
Yes
Garbarino
Yes
Lavine
Yes
Ortiz
Yes
Schimel
ER
Camara
Yes
Giglio
Yes
Lentol
Yes
Otis
Yes
Schimminger
Yes
Ceretto
Yes
Gjonaj
Yes
Lifton
Yes
Palmesano
Yes
Sepulveda
Yes
Clark
Yes
Glick
Yes
Lopez
Yes
Palumbo
Yes
Simanowitz
Yes
Colton
Yes
Goldfeder
Yes
Lupardo
Yes
Paulin
Yes
Simotas
Yes
Cook
Yes
Goodell
Yes
Lupinacci
Yes
Peoples-Stokes
Yes
Skartados
Yes
Corwin
AB
Gottfried
Yes
Magee
Yes
Perry
Yes
Skoufis
Yes
Crespo
Yes
Graf
Yes
Magnarelli
Yes
Pichardo
Yes
Solages
Yes
Crouch
Yes
Gunther
Yes
Malliotakis
Yes
Pretlow
Yes
Stec
‡ Indicates voting via videoconference
S04888 Text:
Go to top STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 4888--A 2013-2014 Regular Sessions IN SENATE April 30, 2013 ___________ Introduced by Sen. STEWART-COUSINS -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Civil Service and Pensions -- recommitted to the Committee on Civil Service and Pensions in accordance with Senate Rule 6, sec. 8 -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said commit- tee AN ACT to authorize the New York city employees' retirement system to consider the application for disability retirement benefits from Peter DiMario The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem- bly, do enact as follows: 1 Section 1. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the application 2 for disability retirement benefits of Peter DiMario, who was employed by 3 the New York city off-track betting corporation from June 1984 until 4 December 2010 when such corporation closed, and is a member of the New 5 York city employees' retirement system, which for reasons not ascribable 6 to his own negligence has been denied a disability retirement from the 7 New York city employees' retirement system, shall be accepted for 8 consideration by the New York city employees' retirement system as if 9 such application had been filed in a timely manner on March 7, 2011. 10 § 2. All costs associated with the implementation of this act shall be 11 borne by the state. 12 § 3. This act shall take effect immediately. FISCAL NOTE.--PROVISIONS OF PROPOSED LEGISLATION: The proposed legis- lation would authorize the New York City Employees' Retirement System ("NYCERS") to accept for consideration an application for Disability Retirement benefits from Peter DiMario. BACKGROUND: Mr. DiMario became a Tier IV member of NYCERS on June 18, 1984 and is covered under the provisions of Retirement and Social Secu- rity Law ("RSSL") Article 15. EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [] is old law to be omitted. LBD01789-03-4S. 4888--A 2 RSSL Article 15, Section 605 provides that an application for Disabil- ity Retirement must be filed either: (a) By a vested member incapacitated as the result of a qualifying World Trade Center condition as defined in RSSL Section 2, at any time, or (b) Within three months from the last date the member was being paid on the payroll or, (c) In the case of a member who was placed on a leave of absence for medical reasons without pay, either voluntarily or involuntarily, at the time he/she ceased being paid, not later than twelve months after the date the employee receives notice that his/her employment status has been terminated. In the case of Mr. DiMario, under current law, he would have had to file pursuant to the preceding basis (b) (i.e., within three months of his last day of pay). His last day of pay was December 7, 2010. However, Mr. DiMario filed for Disability Retirement on October 25, 2011, more than three months after his last day of pay. Since his appli- cation was not timely filed, NYCERS informed Mr. DiMario that it could not be processed. The proposed legislation, if enacted, would authorize NYCERS to accept for consideration his application for Disability Retirement as if it had been filed in a timely manner on March 7, 2011. All costs associated with the implementation of this proposed legis- lation would be borne by New York State. The Effective Date of the proposed legislation would be the Date of Enactment. FINANCIAL IMPACT - ACTUARIAL PRESENT VALUES: The estimated financial impact has been calculated based on the difference between (1) the bene- fits Mr. DiMario would receive if this proposed legislation were enacted and his application for Disability Retirement were approved and (2) the benefits Mr. DiMario would otherwise be entitled to receive. The difference in estimated costs is intended to provide a sense of the ultimate financial impact. The difference in first year employer contributions reflects both the difference in costs and the impact of the actuarial valuation assump- tions initially in use. Based on the actuarial assumptions and methods described herein, on an estimated cost basis, the enactment of this proposed legislation would increase the Actuarial Present Value of Benefits ("APVB") and the Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability ("UAAL") of NYCERS by approximately $245,000 as of June 30, 2013. On an actuarial valuation basis Mr. DiMario is currently considered to be entitled to a Vested Benefit and assumed to have a life expectancy similar to a Service (rather than Disability) retiree. If Mr. DiMario were treated as a Disability Retiree with life expectancy of a Disabili- ty Retiree (assuming he were approved), the APVB and UAAL of NYCERS would increase by approximately $215,000 as of June 30, 2013. FINANCIAL IMPACT - ANNUAL EMPLOYER COSTS AND ANNUAL EMPLOYER CONTRIB- UTIONS: In accordance with Section 13.638.2(k-2) of the Administrative Code of the City of New York ("ACNY"), new UAAL attributable to benefit changes are to be amortized as determined by the Actuary but generally over the remaining working lifetime of those impacted by the benefit changes. For this proposed legislation, Mr. DiMario is inactive and therefore the entire increase in UAAL based on the Actuary's actuarial assumptionsS. 4888--A 3 and methods in effect on June 30, 2013 of $245,000 (on an estimated cost basis) should be recognized in the first year. Similarly, as of June 30, 2013, based on the actuarial valuation assumptions and methods then in effect, the proposed legislation would increase the first year's employer contributions by approximately $215,000. CONTRIBUTION TIMING: If enacted during the 2014 Legislative Session and if his application for Disability Retirement were approved on or before June 30, 2014, his status as a Disability Retiree would likely first be reflected in the June 30, 2014 census data. In accordance with the One-Year Lag methodology used to determine employer contributions, increased employer contributions would be consistent with the increased employer costs and would be determined for Fiscal Year 2016. If enacted during the 2014 Legislative Session, and if his application for Disability Retirement were approved after June 30, 2014 but on or before June 30, 2015, his status as a Disability Retiree would likely first be reflected in the June 30, 2015 census data and increased employer contributions would be determined for Fiscal Year 2017. ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODS: The additional APVB and UAAL for employer contribution purposes presented herein have been calculated by comparing the APVB of a Vested Benefit as determined for actuarial valu- ation purposes (i.e., using a Service Retirement mortality table) with the APVB of a Disability Retirement benefit as determined for actuarial valuation purposes (i.e., using a Disability Retirement mortality table). The additional APVB for employer cost purposes (i.e., additional APV of future employer costs and additional annual employer costs) reflect an assumption that Mr. DiMario's life expectancy is more consistent with a Disability Retirement mortality table. For purposes of determining the APVB of a Disability Retirement bene- fit, we have assumed that Mr. DiMario would elect to have his benefit paid in the form of a 100% joint & survivor benefit which is the option he elected on his Disability Retirement application. In addition to the actuarial assumptions described above, all results presented herein have been calculated based on the actuarial assumptions and methods in effect for the June 30, 2013 (Lag) actuarial valuations used to determine Fiscal Year 2015 employer contributions of NYCERS. ECONOMIC VALUES OF BENEFITS: The actuarial assumptions used to deter- mine the financial impact of the proposed legislation discussed in this Fiscal Note are those appropriate for budgetary models and determining annual employer contributions to NYCERS. However, the economic assumptions (current and proposed) that are used for determining employer contributions do not develop risk-adjusted, economic values of benefits. Such risk-adjusted, economic values of benefits would likely differ significantly from those developed by the budgetary models. STATEMENT OF ACTUARIAL OPINION: I, Robert C. North, Jr., am the Chief Actuary for the New York City Retirement Systems. I am a Fellow of the Society of Actuaries and a Member of the American Academy of Actuaries. I meet the Qualification Standards of the American Academy of Actuaries to render the actuarial opinion contained herein. FISCAL NOTE IDENTIFICATION: This estimate is intended for use only during the 2014 Legislative Session. It is Fiscal Note 2014-05, dated February 4, 2014 prepared by the Chief Actuary for the New York City Employees' Retirement System.