-  This bill is not active in this session.
 

S05248 Summary:

BILL NOS05248B
 
SAME ASSAME AS A08093-A
 
SPONSORBIAGGI
 
COSPNSRJACKSON, SALAZAR
 
MLTSPNSR
 
Amd §§194 & 197, Lab L
 
Prohibits wage differentials based on protected class status.
Go to top    

S05248 Actions:

BILL NOS05248B
 
04/18/2019REFERRED TO LABOR
05/07/20191ST REPORT CAL.641
05/08/20192ND REPORT CAL.
05/13/2019ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
06/04/2019AMENDED ON THIRD READING (T) 5248A
06/14/2019AMENDED ON THIRD READING 5248B
06/17/2019PASSED SENATE
06/17/2019DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
06/17/2019referred to ways and means
06/19/2019substituted for a8093a
06/19/2019ordered to third reading rules cal.470
06/20/2019passed assembly
06/20/2019returned to senate
07/09/2019DELIVERED TO GOVERNOR
07/10/2019SIGNED CHAP.93
Go to top

S05248 Committee Votes:

Go to top

S05248 Floor Votes:

DATE:06/20/2019Assembly Vote  YEA/NAY: 138/9
Yes
Abbate
Yes
Crespo
ER
Gantt
Yes
LiPetri
Yes
Perry
Yes
Simon
Yes
Abinanti
Yes
Crouch
Yes
Garbarino
Yes
Lupardo
Yes
Pheffer Amato
Yes
Simotas
Yes
Arroyo
Yes
Cruz
Yes
Giglio
Yes
Magnarelli
Yes
Pichardo
Yes
Smith
Yes
Ashby
Yes
Cusick
Yes
Glick
Yes
Malliotakis
Yes
Pretlow
Yes
Smullen
Yes
Aubry
Yes
Cymbrowitz
Yes
Goodell
Yes
Manktelow
Yes
Quart
Yes
Solages
No
Barclay
Yes
Davila
Yes
Gottfried
Yes
McDonald
Yes
Ra
Yes
Stec
Yes
Barnwell
Yes
De La Rosa
Yes
Griffin
ER
McDonough
Yes
Raia
Yes
Steck
Yes
Barrett
Yes
DenDekker
Yes
Gunther
Yes
McMahon
Yes
Ramos
Yes
Stern
Yes
Barron
Yes
DeStefano
Yes
Hawley
Yes
Mikulin
Yes
Raynor
Yes
Stirpe
Yes
Benedetto
Yes
Dickens
Yes
Hevesi
Yes
Miller B
Yes
Reilly
No
Tague
Yes
Bichotte
Yes
Dilan
Yes
Hunter
Yes
Miller MG
Yes
Reyes
Yes
Taylor
Yes
Blake
Yes
Dinowitz
Yes
Hyndman
Yes
Miller ML
Yes
Richardson
Yes
Thiele
Yes
Blankenbush
No
DiPietro
Yes
Jacobson
Yes
Montesano
Yes
Rivera
Yes
Titus
Yes
Brabenec
Yes
D'Urso
Yes
Jaffee
Yes
Morinello
Yes
Rodriguez
Yes
Vanel
Yes
Braunstein
Yes
Eichenstein
Yes
Jean-Pierre
Yes
Mosley
Yes
Romeo
Yes
Walczyk
Yes
Bronson
Yes
Englebright
Yes
Johns
Yes
Niou
Yes
Rosenthal D
Yes
Walker
Yes
Buchwald
Yes
Epstein
Yes
Jones
Yes
Nolan
Yes
Rosenthal L
Yes
Wallace
Yes
Burke
Yes
Fahy
Yes
Joyner
Yes
Norris
Yes
Rozic
Yes
Walsh
Yes
Buttenschon
Yes
Fall
Yes
Kim
Yes
O'Donnell
Yes
Ryan
Yes
Weinstein
Yes
Byrne
Yes
Fernandez
Yes
Kolb
Yes
Ortiz
Yes
Salka
Yes
Weprin
Yes
Byrnes
Yes
Finch
Yes
Lalor
Yes
Otis
Yes
Santabarbara
Yes
Williams
Yes
Cahill
No
Fitzpatrick
Yes
Lavine
No
Palmesano
Yes
Sayegh
No
Woerner
Yes
Carroll
No
Friend
No
Lawrence
Yes
Palumbo
No
Schimminger
Yes
Wright
Yes
Colton
Yes
Frontus
Yes
Lentol
Yes
Paulin
Yes
Schmitt
Yes
Zebrowski
Yes
Cook
Yes
Galef
Yes
Lifton
ER
Peoples-Stokes
Yes
Seawright
Yes
Mr. Speaker

‡ Indicates voting via videoconference
Go to top

S05248 Text:



 
                STATE OF NEW YORK
        ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                         5248--B
            Cal. No. 641
 
                               2019-2020 Regular Sessions
 
                    IN SENATE
 
                                     April 18, 2019
                                       ___________
 
        Introduced  by  Sen.  BIAGGI -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
          printed to be committed to the Committee on Labor -- reported  favora-
          bly  from  said committee, ordered to first and second report, ordered
          to a third reading, amended and ordered reprinted, retaining its place
          in the order of third reading -- again amended and ordered  reprinted,
          retaining its place in the order of third reading
 
        AN ACT to amend the labor law, in relation to prohibiting wage differen-
          tials based on protected class status
 
          The  People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-
        bly, do enact as follows:
 
     1    Section 1. The section heading and subdivisions 1 and 2 of section 194
     2  of the labor law, the section heading as added by  chapter  548  of  the
     3  laws  of  1966,  subdivision  1 as amended and subdivision 2 as added by
     4  chapter 362 of the laws of 2015, are amended to read as follows:
     5    Differential in rate of pay because of [sex]  protected  class  status
     6  prohibited.    1.  No  employee with status within one or more protected
     7  class or classes shall be paid a wage at a rate less than  the  rate  at
     8  which  an  employee [of the opposite sex] without status within the same
     9  protected class or classes in the same establishment is  paid  for:  (a)
    10  equal  work  on  a  job  the  performance of which requires equal skill,
    11  effort and responsibility, and which is performed under similar  working
    12  conditions,  or (b) substantially similar work, when viewed as a compos-
    13  ite of skill, effort, and responsibility, and  performed  under  similar
    14  working conditions; except where payment is made pursuant to a differen-
    15  tial based on:
    16    [a.] (i) a seniority system;
    17    [b.] (ii) a merit system;
    18    [c.]  (iii) a system which measures earnings by quantity or quality of
    19  production; or
    20    [d.] (iv) a bona fide factor other than [sex]  status  within  one  or
    21  more protected class or classes, such as education, training, or experi-
 
         EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                              [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                                   LBD10298-06-9

        S. 5248--B                          2
 
     1  ence.  Such  factor: [(i)] (A) shall not be based upon or derived from a
     2  [sex-based] differential in compensation based on status within  one  or
     3  more protected class or classes and [(ii)] (B) shall be job-related with
     4  respect  to  the position in question and shall be consistent with busi-
     5  ness necessity. Such exception under this paragraph shall not apply when
     6  the employee demonstrates [(A)] (1) that an employer uses  a  particular
     7  employment practice that causes a disparate impact on the basis of [sex]
     8  status  within one or more protected class or classes, [(B)] (2) that an
     9  alternative employment practice exists that would serve the  same  busi-
    10  ness  purpose  and not produce such differential, and [(C)] (3) that the
    11  employer has refused to adopt such alternative practice.
    12    2. For the purpose of subdivision one of this section[,]:  (a)  "busi-
    13  ness  necessity"  shall  be  defined  as  a factor that bears a manifest
    14  relationship to the employment in question, and  (b)  "protected  class"
    15  shall  include  age,  race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orien-
    16  tation, gender identity or expression, military status, sex, disability,
    17  predisposing genetic characteristics, familial status,  marital  status,
    18  or  domestic  violence  victim  status,  and any employee protected from
    19  discrimination pursuant to paragraphs (a), (b), and (c)  of  subdivision
    20  one  of  section  two  hundred  ninety-six and any intern protected from
    21  discrimination pursuant to section two hundred ninety-six-c of the exec-
    22  utive law.
    23    § 2. Section 197 of the labor law, as amended by chapter  564  of  the
    24  laws of 2010, is amended to read as follows:
    25    §  197.  Civil penalty. Any employer who fails to pay the wages of his
    26  employees or shall  differentiate  in  rate  of  pay  because  of  [sex]
    27  protected  class  status,  as provided in this article, shall forfeit to
    28  the people of the state the sum of five hundred dollars  for  each  such
    29  failure,  to be recovered by the commissioner in any legal action neces-
    30  sary, including administrative action or a civil action.
    31    § 3. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day  after  it  shall
    32  have become a law.
Go to top