NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION submitted in accordance with Assembly Rule III, Sec 1(f)
 
BILL NUMBER: A1265
SPONSOR: Cahill (MS)
 
TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the agriculture and markets law, in
relation to companion animal hoarding  
 
PURPOSE: This bill would create a violation of companion animal hoard-
ing, which is defined as neglect in terms of their surrounding environ-
ment and a lack of care. The bill further allows a court to order mental
health examinations and prohibit possession of such animals as penal-
ties.
 
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Adds a new section 353-f to the agriculture and
markets law; amends paragraph (a) of subdivision 8 of section 374 of the
agriculture and markets law.
 
JUSTIFICATION: Across the country, there is an increasing cases where
large numbers of companion animals are seized from individuals who lack
the ability to provide them with the basics of life, clean place to
live, adequate food and water, and necessary veterinary care. The living
conditions in many of these cases are not just marginal-frequently they
fall well below accepted standards for either companion animals or human
beings. Severe overcrowding, excessive feces, dirt, garbage, dangerous
levels of ammonia from urine-saturated surfaces, animals that plainly
suffer from parasite infestation, upper respiratory infections, and
other ailments and owners or custodians that neither fully recognize nor
are capable of remedying the situation. Sadly, these companion animal
"hoarding" cases are also frequently accompanied by self neglect and
neglect of other people living in the household-particularly children
and the elderly. When authorities do intervene, the cost--in terms of
other animal suffering and government expenditure--is substantial.
Animals removed from hoarding situations are often too debilitated, sick
or injured to be helped, when they are able to be rehabilitated, the
cost of housing, food, and veterinary care can be extremely high. States
around the country are responding to companion animal hoarding with
legislation that gives law enforcement the tools it needs for early
intervention before the situation becomes a full-blown cruelty case.
This legislation defines companion animal hoarding, makes provision for
seizure of animals and requires that those deemed boarders are evaluated
to determine whether they can receive services to assist them with their
problem. Provision is made for covering the cost of caring for animals'
seized in hoarding cases and to ensure that those determined to be
hoarders do not have custody of companion animals for a period of time
that the sentencing court deems reasonable and appropriate.
 
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2013-2014: A.1466 - Referred to Agriculture
2011-2012: A.191 - Referred to Agriculture 2009-2010: A.592-A Referred
to Agriculture 2007-2008: A.9345 Referred to Agriculture 2005-2006:
A.7572 Referred to Agriculture
 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.
 
EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately.
STATE OF NEW YORK
________________________________________________________________________
1265
2015-2016 Regular Sessions
IN ASSEMBLY
January 8, 2015
___________
Introduced by M. of A. CAHILL -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. BUTLER,
CUSICK, ENGLEBRIGHT, KAVANAGH, LUPARDO, MARKEY -- read once and
referred to the Committee on Agriculture
AN ACT to amend the agriculture and markets law, in relation to compan-
ion animal hoarding
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assem-bly, do enact as follows:
1 Section 1. Legislative intent. Across the country, there is an
2 increasing incidence of cases where large numbers of companion animals
3 are seized from individuals who lack the ability to provide them with
4 the basics of life - clean place to live, adequate food and water and
5 necessary veterinary care. The living conditions in many of these cases
6 are not just marginal - frequently they fall well below accepted stand-
7 ards for either companion animals or human beings. Severe overcrowding,
8 excessive feces, dirt, garbage, dangerous levels of ammonia from urine-
9 saturated surfaces, animals that plainly suffer from parasite infesta-
10 tion, upper respiratory infections, and other ailments and owners or
11 custodians that neither fully recognize nor are capable of remedying the
12 situation.
13 Sadly, these companion animal "hoarding" cases are also frequently
14 accompanied by self neglect and neglect of other people living in the
15 household - particularly children and the elderly. When authorities do
16 intervene, the cost - in terms of both animal suffering and government
17 expenditure - is substantial. Animals removed from hoarding situations
18 are often too debilitated, sick or injured to be helped. When they are
19 able to be rehabilitated, the cost of housing, food and veterinary care
20 can be extremely high.
21 States around the country are responding to companion animal hoarding
22 with legislation that gives law enforcement the tools it needs for early
23 intervention - before the situation becomes a full-blown cruelty case.
24 This legislation defines companion animal hoarding, makes provision for
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[] is old law to be omitted.
LBD06238-01-5
A. 1265 2
1 seizure of animals and requires that those deemed hoarders are evaluated
2 to determine whether they can receive services to assist them with their
3 problem. Provision is made for covering the cost of caring for animals
4 seized in hoarding cases and to ensure that those determined to be
5 hoarders do not have custody of companion animals for a period of time
6 that the sentencing court deems reasonable and appropriate.
7 § 2. The agriculture and markets law is amended by adding a new
8 section 353-g to read as follows:
9 § 353-g. Companion animal hoarding. 1. A person is guilty of companion
10 animal hoarding when he or she owns, possesses, or has custody of more
11 companion animals than he or she can properly care for as evidenced by
12 ownership, possession or custody of more than twenty-five companion
13 animals living in conditions that are likely to jeopardize the health
14 and well being of the animals and/or human beings living in the house-
15 hold as evidenced by:
16 (a) Keeping the companion animals in a severely overcrowded living
17 environment likely to endanger their health or safety;
18 (b) Failure by the person who owns, possesses or has custody of the
19 companion animals to maintain his or her living environment in a sani-
20 tary condition such as to pose a serious risk to the health or safety of
21 the companion animals and/or people living in that environment. Failure
22 to provide a sufficiently sanitary living environment may be evidenced
23 by conditions such as excessive feces, urine, dirt, garbage or a lack of
24 basic services that make a home habitable such as heat, hot water,
25 ventilation or electricity; and
26 (c) The presence of companion animals that, without justification,
27 have not received necessary veterinary treatment within a reasonable
28 period of time.
29 2. In addition to any other penalty imposed for a violation of this
30 section, the court shall order the defendant to undergo a mental health
31 evaluation by a qualified professional selected by the court. With due
32 consideration to the findings of such mental health professional, the
33 court may order that the defendant undergo and complete a course of
34 treatment, therapy and/or counseling. Also with due consideration to the
35 findings of such mental health professional, the court may also order
36 that the defendant be prohibited from owning companion animals for a
37 period of time deemed reasonable by the court. The provisions of
38 sections three hundred seventy-one, three hundred seventy-two, three
39 hundred seventy-three and three hundred seventy-four of this article
40 shall apply to violations of this section.
41 3. Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect any
42 protections afforded to companion animals under any other provision of
43 this article.
44 § 3. Paragraph a of subdivision 8 of section 374 of the agriculture
45 and markets law, as amended by chapter 594 of the laws of 2003 and such
46 subdivision as renumbered by chapter 479 of the laws of 2009, is amended
47 to read as follows:
48 a. In addition to any other penalty provided by law, upon conviction
49 for any violation of section three hundred fifty-one, three hundred
50 fifty-three, three hundred fifty-three-a, three hundred fifty-three-b,
51 three hundred fifty-three-g, three hundred fifty-five, three hundred
52 fifty-six, three hundred fifty-nine, three hundred sixty, three hundred
53 sixty-one, three hundred sixty-five or three hundred sixty-eight of this
54 article, the convicted person may, after a duly held hearing pursuant to
55 paragraph f of this subdivision, be ordered by the court to forfeit, to
56 a duly incorporated society for the prevention of cruelty to animals or
A. 1265 3
1 a duly incorporated humane society or authorized agents thereof, the
2 animal or animals which are the basis of the conviction. Upon such an
3 order of forfeiture, the convicted person shall be deemed to have relin-
4 quished all rights to the animals which are the basis of the conviction,
5 except those granted in paragraph d of this subdivision.
6 § 4. This act shall take effect immediately.